Using SQL Server for WSS 3.0 instead of Windows Internal database

Posted by val on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by val
Published on 2010-03-16T14:30:36Z Indexed on 2010/03/16 14:36 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 274

Filed under:
|
|
|

Hi Folks,

There are actually two related questions:

  1. is it possible or advisable to use a full blown stand-alone SQL server for SharePoint Services WSS3.0 instead of the supplied windows internal database it comes with? The client I am working for is asking to utilize their existent SQL server for all WSS content databases to possibly minimize admin effort and improve performance.

  2. As well, would you advise to install WSS on one physical server and the content database on another server? Any gain in performace? Practicality? ect. The default is WSS and all of its databases are installed on the same single server. We don't really need a farm setup of MOSS, because the WSS capabilities are enough for our needs.

Thanks, Val

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sharepoint

Related posts about wss