Posted
by Herman
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Herman
Published on 2010-03-19T13:52:27Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
20:01 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 186
Just wanted to know if there is any difference between the two, in the context of a fully trust asp.net mvc 2 application.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
as seen on ASP.net Weblogs
- Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Note: ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM isn’t yet released! But this tool will help you get your ASP.NET MVC 1.0 applications ready for when it is! I have updated the MVC App Converter to convert projects from ASP.NET MVC 1.0 to ASP.NET MVC 2 RTM. This should be last the last major change to the MVC App Converter…
>>> More
as seen on Geeks with Blogs
- Search for 'Geeks with Blogs'
Razor View Engine
The Razor view engine is a new view engine option for ASP.NET MVC that supports the Razor templating syntax. The Razor syntax is a streamlined approach to HTML templating designed with the goal of being a code driven minimalist templating approach that builds on existing C#, VB…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I had updated my app from MVC 1 to MVC 2. After that some pages throws PathTooLongException:
[PathTooLongException: The specified path, file name, or both are too long. The fully qualified file name must be less than 260 characters, and the directory name must be less than 248 characters.]
…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
what is differece between Asp.net MVC 1 and Asp.net MVC 2?
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've been using ASP.NET MVC 1 for a while now, and am keen to take advantage of the improvements in MVC 2. Things like validation seem greatly improved, and strongly-typed HTML helper methods look great.
So, for those of you who have real-world practical experience of using ASP.NET MVC 1 and are…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I removed all the 'add' elements in the compilation/assemblies element.
So initially in my application's root web.config file:
<compilation debug="true" targetFramework="4.0">
<assemblies>
<add assembly="System.Web.Abstractions, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=31BF3856AD364E35"/>
…
>>> More
as seen on ASP.net Weblogs
- Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Something we've been doing in moq since the very beginning is to have a single assembly as output: Moq.dll. This reduces the clutter for users and lets them focus on what they need from our library, rather than getting the noise of whatever third-party (or internal) libraries we use to implement it…
>>> More
as seen on West-Wind
- Search for 'West-Wind'
When we work on typical day to day applications, it's easy to forget some of the core features of the .NET framework. For me personally it's been a long time since I've learned about some of the underlying CLR system level services even though I rely on them on a daily basis. I often think only about…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have build 64-bit (x64) versions of some assemblies and am trying to obfuscate them with .NET Reactor, which claims to have 64-bit support. However, even if I disable all protection and locking options .NET Reactor is always producing 32-bit assemblies!
Does anyone know how to get .NET Reactor…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Quite a few apps support plugins
Are there any downsides to having a large # of plugins ?
Is there a sweet spot beyond which there's a performance degradation perhaps ?
What's the largest # of assemblies you've seen loaded in an app ?
>>> More
