Posted
by Manjot
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Manjot
Published on 2009-08-10T22:33:55Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
13:31 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 288
Hi,
Is Cumulative update package 3 for SQL Server 2008 SP1 available for 64 bit SQL server?
I couldnt find the link. Please advice.
Thanks- Manjot
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
as seen on SQL Blogcasts
- Search for 'SQL Blogcasts'
Here is the news on Cumulative Update release news on SQL Server 2008 R2 RTM & SQL Server 2008 Service Pack 1. First let us go through SQL Server 2008 R2 RTM cumulative update, release consist the only hotfixes that were released in Cumulative Update 5, 6, & 7 for SQL Server 2008 SP1. Cumulative…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
This will give many opportunities in Web-development transition from Sql Server 2008 to Sql Server 2008 R2:
1.If database in one instance of SQL Server.
2.a) if in the server PC have 1 processor
b) if in the server PC have 4 processors
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have an MDF and LDF file of SQL Server 2005. i attached it with SQL Server 2008 and did some change in data. now when i attached it back to sql server 2005 Express Edition it gives version error.
The database 'E:\DB\JOBPERS.MDF' cannot be opened because it is version 655. This server supports version…
>>> More
as seen on ASP.net Weblogs
- Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
I am trying to perform a database attach upgrade to SharePoint Foundation 2010. At this point I am trying to attach the content database to a Web application by using Windows Powershell: Mount-SPContentDatabase -Name <DatabaseName> -DatabaseServer <ServerName> -WebApplication <URL>…
>>> More
as seen on SQL Blog
- Search for 'SQL Blog'
Ha. I had quite disputable pleasure of installing and reinstalling and reinstalling and reinstalling – I think about 5 times before it worked – Reporting Server 2008 on Windows Server with the same year number in name. During my struggle I came across an error which seems to be not quite unfamiliar…
>>> More
