Why isn't the Type class in the System.Reflection namespace?
Posted
by Arc
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Arc
Published on 2010-03-19T14:36:12Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
15:01 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 245
Everything about Type is reflective in nature. Is it because Type is used more often than the rest of the classes in System.Reflection? Or because it functions more like a system class than a reflection class?
In short, I've always wondered what the motivation behind the location of System.Type was.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner