Is a VCS appropriate for usage by a designer?

Posted by iconiK on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by iconiK
Published on 2010-03-22T16:46:57Z Indexed on 2010/03/22 17:01 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 449

Filed under:
|
|

I know that a VCS is absolutely critical for a developer to increase productivity and protect the code, no doubts about it. But what about a designer, using say, Photoshop (though it's not specific to any tools, just to make my point clearer).

VCSs uses delta compression to store different versions of files. This works very well for code, but for images, that's a problem. Raster image files are binary formats, though vector image files are text (SVG comes to my mind) and pose to problem. The problem comes with .psd files (and any other image "source" file) - those can get pretty big and since I'm not familiar with the format, I'll consider them as binary files. How would a VCS work in this condition?

The repository could be pretty darned big if the VCS server isn't able to diff the files efficiently (or worse, not at all) and over time this can become a really big pain when someone needs to check out the repository (or clone it if using a DVCS).

Have any of you used a VCS for this purpose? How well does it work? I'm mostly interested in Mercurial, though this is a general situation that applies to any VCS.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about vcs

Related posts about image