IgnoreArguments including an Action<T>

Posted by James L on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by James L
Published on 2010-03-23T10:23:15Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 10:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 288

Filed under:

rhino-mocks

|

mocking

I'm probably missing something obvious here, so apologies in advance!

Using Rhino Mocks, how do I set an expectation that a method taking an Action will be called, but I want to use IgnoreArguments. Obviously I can't specify null as that isn't an Action, and I dont want any meaningless code in the test.

As I said, it's probably obvious by the syntax is eluding me at the moment!

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about rhino-mocks

Using Lambdas for return values in Rhino.Mocks

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In a recent StackOverflow question, someone showed some sample code they’d like to be able to use. The particular syntax they used isn’t supported by Rhino.Mocks, but it was an interesting idea that I thought could be easily implemented with an extension method. Background When stubbing a… >>> More
Unit Test For NpgsqlCommand With Rhino Mocks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
My unit test keeps getting the following error: "System.InvalidOperationException: The Connection is not open." The Test [TestFixture] public class Test { [Test] public void Test1() { NpgsqlConnection connection = MockRepository.GenerateStub<NpgsqlConnection>(); … >>> More
Rhino Mocks, Dependency Injection, and Separation of Concerns

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am new to mocking and dependency injection and need some guidance. My application is using a typical N-Tier architecture where the BLL references the DAL, and the UI references the BLL but not the DAL. Pretty straight forward. Lets say, for example, I have the following classes: class MyDataAccess… >>> More
RhinoMocks AAA Syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I've spent a good part of the day trying to figure out why a simple RhinoMocks test doesn't return the value I'm setting in the return. I'm sure that I'm just missing something really simple but I can't figure it out. Here's my test: [TestMethod] public void CopyvRAFiles_ShouldCallCopyvRAFiles_ShouldReturnTrue2() … >>> More
TDD a controller with ASP.NET MVC 2, NUnit and Rhino Mocks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
What would a simple unit test look like to confirm that a certain controller exists if I am using Rhino Mocks, NUnit and ASP.NET MVC 2? I'm trying to wrap my head around the concept of TDD, but I can't see to figure out how a simple test like "Controller XYZ Exists" would look. In addition, what… >>> More

Related posts about mocking

Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start let’s first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name… >>> More
Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start lets first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name { get;… >>> More
Auto Mocking using JustMock

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Auto mocking containers are designed to reduce the friction of keeping unit test beds in sync with the code being tested as systems are updated and evolve over time. This is one sentence how you define auto mocking. Of course this is a more or less formal. In a more informal way auto mocking containers… >>> More
not using partial mocking? do they also mean in web-app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Im learning Mockito and in chapter 16 they say you should not use partial mocking in new system. I disagree, for example in one of my actions i use partial mocking for static framework methods, sql calls, etc. I extracted the stuff into methods and then mock it in tests. Most of those methods are… >>> More
Talks Submitted for Ann Arbor Day of .NET 2010

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Just submitted my session abstracts for Ann Arbor's Day of .NET 2010. Getting up to speed with .NET 3.5 -- Just in time for 4.0! Yes, C# 4.0 is just around the corner. But if you haven't had the chance to use C# 3.5 extensively, this session will start from the ground up with the new… >>> More