Mercurial to Mercurial to Subversion Workflow Problem

Posted by Dalroth on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Dalroth
Published on 2010-03-23T19:57:37Z Indexed on 2010/03/23 20:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 887

Filed under:
|

We're migrating from Subversion to Mercurial. To facilitate the migration, we're creating an intermediate Mercurial repository that is a clone of our Subversion repository. All developers will be begin switching over to the Mercurial repository, and we'll periodically push changes from the intermediate Mercurial repository to the existing Subversion repository. After a period of time, we'll simply obsolete the Subversion repository and the intermediate Mercurial repository will become the new system of record.

Dev 1 Local --+--> Mercurial --+--> Subversion
Dev 2 Local --+                +
Dev 3 Local --+                +
Dev 4 -------------------------+

I've been testing this out, but I keep running into a problem when I push changes from my local repository, to the intermediate Mercurial repository, and then up into our Subversion repository.

alt text

On my local machine, I have a changeset that is committed and ready to be pushed to our intermediate Mercurial repository. Here you can see it is revision #2263 with hash 625...

alt text

I push only this changeset to the remote repository.

alt text

So far, everything looks good. The changeset has been pushed.

hg update
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

I now switch over to the remote repository, and update the working directory.

hg push
pushing to svn://...
searching for changes
[r3834] bmurphy: database namespace
pulled 1 revisions
saving bundle to /srv/hg/repository/.hg/strip-backup/62539f8df3b2-temp
adding branch
adding changesets
adding manifests
adding file changes
added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
rebase completed

Next, I push the change up to Subversion, works great. At this point, the change is in the Subversion repository and I return attention back to my local client.

alt text

I pull changes to my local machine. Huh? I've now got two changesets. My original changeset appears as a local branch now.

alt text

The other changeset has a new revision number 2264, and a new hash 10c1...

alt text

Anyway, I update my local repo to the new revision.

alt text

I'm now switched over.

alt text

So, I finally click the "determine and mark outgoing changesets" and as you can see Mercurial still wants to push out my previous changesets even though they've already been pushed.

Clearly, I'm doing something wrong.

I also can't merge the two revisions. If I merge the two revisions on my local machine, I end up with a "merge" commit. When I push that merge commit out to the intermediate Mercurial repository, I can no longer push changes out to our Subversion repository. I end up with the following problem:

hg update
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

hg push
pushing to svn://...
searching for changes
abort: Sorry, can't find svn parent of a merge revision.

and I have to rollback the merge to get back to a working state.

What am I missing?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about mercurial

Related posts about svn