fire and forget compared to http request

Posted by cometta on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by cometta
Published on 2010-03-28T05:20:53Z Indexed on 2010/03/28 5:23 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 516

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

Hi, i looking for opinion from you all. I have a web application that need to records data into another web application database. I not prefer to use http request GET on 2nd application because of latency issue. I looking for fast way to save records on 2nd application quickly, i came across the idea of "fire and forget" , will JMX suit for this scenario? from my understanding jmx will gurantee message delivery. Let say i need to call at least 1000 random requests per seconds to 2nd application should i use jmx? http request? or xmpp instead?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about jmx