Git and Mercurial - Compare and Contrast

Posted by TM on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by TM
Published on 2009-10-21T04:46:35Z Indexed on 2010/03/29 5:13 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 372

Filed under:
|
|
|

For a while now I've been using subversion for my personal projects.

More and more I keep hearing great things about Git and Mercurial, and DVCS in general.

I'd like to give the whole DVCS thing a whirl, but I'm not too familiar with either option.

What are some of the differences between Mercurial and Git?

Note that I'm not trying to find out which one is "best" or even which one I should start with. I'm mainly looking for key areas where they are similar and where they are different, because I am interested to know how they differ in terms of implementation and philosophy.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about version-control

Related posts about dvcs