Java Concurrency in practice sample question

Posted by andy boot on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by andy boot
Published on 2010-04-10T16:26:42Z Indexed on 2010/04/10 16:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 234

Filed under:
|

I am reading "Java Concurrency in practice" and looking at the example code on page 51.

This states that if a thread has references to a shared object then other threads may be able to access that object before the constructor has finished executing.

I have tried to put this into practice and so I wrote this code thinking that if I ran it enough times a RuntimeException("World is f*cked") would occur. But it isn't doing.

Is this a case of the Java spec not guaranting something but my particular implementation of java guaranteeing it for me? (java version: 1.5.0 on Ubuntu) Or have I misread something in the book?

Code: (I expect an exception but it is never thrown)

public class Threads {
 private Widgit w;

 public static void main(String[] s) throws Exception {
  while(true){
   Threads t = new Threads();
   t.runThreads();
  }
 }

 private void runThreads() throws Exception{
  new Checker().start();
  w = new Widgit((int)(Math.random() * 100)  + 1);
 }

 private class Checker extends Thread{
  private static final int LOOP_TIMES = 1000;

  public void run() {
   int count = 0;
   for(int i = 0; i < LOOP_TIMES; i++){
    try {
     w.checkMe();
     count++;
    } catch(NullPointerException npe){
     //ignore
    }
   }
   System.out.println("checked: "+count+" times out of "+LOOP_TIMES);
  }
 }

 private static class Widgit{
  private int n;
  private int n2;

  Widgit(int n) throws InterruptedException{
   this.n = n;
   Thread.sleep(2);
   this.n2 = n;
  }

  void checkMe(){
   if (n != n2) {
    throw new RuntimeException("World is f*cked");
   }
  }
 }

}

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about concurrency