What's your convention for typedef'ing shared_ptr?

Posted by Emile Cormier on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Emile Cormier
Published on 2010-04-26T22:40:50Z Indexed on 2010/04/26 22:43 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 315

I'm flip-flopping between naming conventions for typedef'ing the boost::shared_ptr template. For example:

typedef boost::shared_ptr<Foo> FooPtr;

Before settling on a convention, I'd like to see what others use. What is your convention?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about boost