Am I correct in my assumption about synchronized block?

Posted by kunjaan on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by kunjaan
Published on 2010-05-03T03:27:29Z Indexed on 2010/05/03 3:38 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 305

I have a method shout() with a synchronized block.

  private void shout(){
    System.out.println("SHOUT " + Thread.currentThread().getName());
    synchronized(this){
      System.out.println("Synchronized Shout"  + Thread.currentThread().getName());
      try {
        Thread.sleep(50);
      }
      catch (InterruptedException e) {
        e.printStackTrace();
      }
      System.out.println("Synchronized Shout"  + Thread.currentThread().getName());
     }
  }

If I have two Threads that run this method, am I correct in assuming that the two "Synchronized Shout" will always appear one after the other? There can be no other statements in between the "Synchronized Shout"?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about thread

Related posts about java