Stubbing out methods that explicitly implement an interface using Rhino Mocks

Posted by Ben Aston on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Ben Aston
Published on 2010-05-05T09:07:13Z Indexed on 2010/05/05 9:08 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 288

Filed under:

rhino-mocks

|

explicit-interface

|

c#

How can I stub out methods that explicitly implement an interface using Rhino Mocks?

As I understand it, Rhino Mocks requires stubbed out methods to be virtual, and explicitly implemented interface members are not virtual.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about rhino-mocks

Using Lambdas for return values in Rhino.Mocks

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In a recent StackOverflow question, someone showed some sample code they’d like to be able to use. The particular syntax they used isn’t supported by Rhino.Mocks, but it was an interesting idea that I thought could be easily implemented with an extension method. Background When stubbing a… >>> More
Unit Test For NpgsqlCommand With Rhino Mocks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
My unit test keeps getting the following error: "System.InvalidOperationException: The Connection is not open." The Test [TestFixture] public class Test { [Test] public void Test1() { NpgsqlConnection connection = MockRepository.GenerateStub<NpgsqlConnection>(); … >>> More
Rhino Mocks, Dependency Injection, and Separation of Concerns

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am new to mocking and dependency injection and need some guidance. My application is using a typical N-Tier architecture where the BLL references the DAL, and the UI references the BLL but not the DAL. Pretty straight forward. Lets say, for example, I have the following classes: class MyDataAccess… >>> More
RhinoMocks AAA Syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I've spent a good part of the day trying to figure out why a simple RhinoMocks test doesn't return the value I'm setting in the return. I'm sure that I'm just missing something really simple but I can't figure it out. Here's my test: [TestMethod] public void CopyvRAFiles_ShouldCallCopyvRAFiles_ShouldReturnTrue2() … >>> More
TDD a controller with ASP.NET MVC 2, NUnit and Rhino Mocks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
What would a simple unit test look like to confirm that a certain controller exists if I am using Rhino Mocks, NUnit and ASP.NET MVC 2? I'm trying to wrap my head around the concept of TDD, but I can't see to figure out how a simple test like "Controller XYZ Exists" would look. In addition, what… >>> More

Related posts about explicit-interface

Object initializer with explicit interface in C#

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
How can I use an object initializer with an explicit interface implementation in C#? public interface IType { string Property1 { get; set; } } public class Type1 : IType { string IType.Property1() { get; set; } } ... //doesn't work var v = new Type1 { IType.Property1 = "myString" }; >>> More
C# Language Design: explicit interface implementation of an event

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Small question about C# language design :)) If I had an interface like this: interface IFoo { int Value { get; set; } } It's possible to explicitly implement such interface using C# 3.0 auto-implemented properties: sealed class Foo : IFoo { int IFoo.Value { get; set; } } But if I had an… >>> More
What are good reasons to use explicit interface implementation for the sole purpose of hiding members?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
During one of my studies into the intricacies of C#, I came across an interesting passage concerning explicit interface implementation. While this syntax is quite helpful when you need to resolve name clashes, you can use explicit interface implementation simply to hide more "advanced" … >>> More
Interface member name conflicts in ActionScript 3

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am trying to create an ActionScript 3 class that implements two interfaces. The interfaces contain member functions with different signatures but the same name: public interface IFoo { function doStuff(input:int):void; } public interface IBar { function doStuff(input1:String, input2:Number):void; } public… >>> More
Stubbing out methods that explicitly implement an interface using Rhino Mocks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
How can I stub out methods that explicitly implement an interface using Rhino Mocks? As I understand it, Rhino Mocks requires stubbed out methods to be virtual, and explicitly implemented interface members are not virtual. >>> More