Union struct produces garbage and general question about struct nomenclature

Posted by SoulBeaver on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by SoulBeaver
Published on 2010-05-16T21:25:09Z Indexed on 2010/05/16 21:30 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 506

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

I read about unions the other day( today ) and tried the sample functions that came with them. Easy enough, but the result was clear and utter garbage.

The first example is:

union Test
{ 
    int Int;

    struct
    {
        char byte1;
        char byte2;
        char byte3;
        char byte4;
    } Bytes;
};

where an int is assumed to have 32 bits. After I set a value Test t; t.Int = 7; and then cout

cout << t.Bytes.byte1 << etc...

the individual bytes, there is nothing displayed, but my computer beeps. Which is fairly odd I guess.

The second example gave me even worse results.

union SwitchEndian
{
    unsigned short word;

    struct
    {
        unsigned char hi;
        unsigned char lo;
    } data;
} Switcher; 

Looks a little wonky in my opinion. Anyway, from the description it says, this should automatically store the result in a high/little endian format when I set the value like

Switcher.word = 7656; and calling with cout << Switcher.data.hi << endl

The result of this were symbols not even defined in the ASCII chart. Not sure why those are showing up.

Finally, I had an error when I tried correcting the example by, instead of placing Bytes at the end of the struct, positioning it right next to it. So instead of

struct {} Bytes;

I wanted to write

struct Bytes {};

This tossed me a big ol' error. What's the difference between these? Since C++ cannot have unnamed structs it seemed, at the time, pretty obvious that the Bytes positioned at the beginning and at the end are the things that name it. Except no, that's not the entire answer I guess. What is it then?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about struct

Related posts about union