Is there a way to undo Mocha stubbing of any_instance in Test::Unit

Posted by Craig Walker on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Craig Walker
Published on 2010-05-24T01:37:57Z Indexed on 2010/05/24 1:40 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 375

Filed under:

ruby

|

mocking

|

test

|

stub

|

mocha

Much like this question, I too am using Ryan Bates's nifty_scaffold. It has the desirable aspect of using Mocha's any_instance method to force an "invalid" state in model objects buried behind the controller.

Unlike the question I linked to, I'm not using RSpec, but Test::Unit. That means that the two RSpec-centric solutions there won't work for me.

Is there a general (ie: works with Test::Unit) way to remove the any_instance stubbing? I believe that it's causing a bug in my tests, and I'd like to verify that.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about ruby

Setting up Rails to work with sqlserver

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Ok I followed the steps for setting up ruby and rails on my Vista machine and I am having a problem connecting to the database. Contents of database.yml development: adapter: sqlserver database: APPS_SETUP Host: WindowsVT06\SQLEXPRESS Username: se Password: paswd Run rake db:migrate… >>> More
marshal data too short!!!

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
My application requires to keep large data objects in session. There are like 3-4 data objects each created by parsing a csv containing 150 X 20 cells having strings of 3-4 characters. My application shows this error- "marshal data too short". I tried this- Deleting the old session table. Deleting… >>> More
Sinatra and XML POST request

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I don't know is it my mistake or no. So i have that code: <code> post '/singin/get_token' do content_type :xml puts request.body.read puts xmlRequest xmlRequest = REXML::Document.new(request.body.read) ... </code> And when i post something like that: <code> <?xml… >>> More
how to change ruby path from /usr/bin/ruby to /usr/local/bin/ruby

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
reading around the various ruby install tutorials it's required to change path from /usr/bin/ruby to /usr/local/bin/ruby but i cant seem to be able to do it. Ultimately i want to install Ruby 1.9.2, should i uninstall 1.8.7 or what? i tried to install Ruby 1.9.2 with macports, the installation seemed… >>> More
strange bundler error: tar_input.rb:49:in `initialize': not in gzip format (Zlib::GzipFile::Error) o

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i am getting a strange bundler error when running bundle pack with bundler 0.9.12 any ideas? (see pastie for a better formatted code: http://pastie.org/881328 ) /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7-2010.01/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/rubygems/package/tar_input.rb:49:in `initialize': not in gzip format (Zlib::GzipFile::Error) … >>> More

Related posts about mocking

Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start let’s first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name… >>> More
Mocking successive calls of similar type via sequential mocking

as seen on Dot net Slackers - Search for 'Dot net Slackers'
In this post , i show how you can benefit from sequential mocking feature[In JustMock] for setting up expectations with successive calls of same type. To start lets first consider the following dummy database and entity class. public class Person { public virtual string Name { get;… >>> More
Auto Mocking using JustMock

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Auto mocking containers are designed to reduce the friction of keeping unit test beds in sync with the code being tested as systems are updated and evolve over time. This is one sentence how you define auto mocking. Of course this is a more or less formal. In a more informal way auto mocking containers… >>> More
not using partial mocking? do they also mean in web-app?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Im learning Mockito and in chapter 16 they say you should not use partial mocking in new system. I disagree, for example in one of my actions i use partial mocking for static framework methods, sql calls, etc. I extracted the stuff into methods and then mock it in tests. Most of those methods are… >>> More
Talks Submitted for Ann Arbor Day of .NET 2010

as seen on ASP.net Weblogs - Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
Just submitted my session abstracts for Ann Arbor's Day of .NET 2010. Getting up to speed with .NET 3.5 -- Just in time for 4.0! Yes, C# 4.0 is just around the corner. But if you haven't had the chance to use C# 3.5 extensively, this session will start from the ground up with the new… >>> More