For single-producer, single-consumer should I use a BlockingCollection or a ConcurrentQueue?
Posted
by Jonathan Allen
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Jonathan Allen
Published on 2010-05-26T20:38:02Z
Indexed on
2010/05/26
20:41 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 264
For single-producer, single-consumer should I use a BlockingCollection or a ConcurrentQueue?
Concerns: * My goal is to pull up to 100 items at a time and send them as a batch to the next step. * If I use a ConcurrentQueue, I have to manually cause it to go asleep when there is no work to be done. Otherwise I waste CPU cycles on spinning. * If I use a BlockingQueue and I only have 99 work items, it could indefinitely block until there the 100th item arrives.
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.collections.concurrent.aspx
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
