-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to use F# for an ASP.NET MVC application. One my controller actions sends an F# list to the view, so I write:
<%@ Page Language="C#" Inherits="ViewPage<FSharpList<int>>" %>
Of course, for this to work, I have to add Microsoft.FSharp.Collections to the namespaces element…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Here's my test code to isolate the problem:
open Microsoft.FSharp.Metadata
[<EntryPoint>]
let main args =
let core = FSharpAssembly.FromFile @"C:\Program Files\FSharp-2.0.0.0\\bin\FSharp.Core.dll"
let core2 = FSharpAssembly.FSharpLibrary
let core3 = System.AppDomain.CurrentDomain.GetAssemblies()…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I have this monstrous f# 2.0 program
My mono version is
Mono JIT compiler version 2.9 (master/f593354 Sun Dec 26 03:15:55 EET 2010)
Copyright (C) 2002-2010 Novell, Inc and Contributors. www.mono-project.com
TLS: __thread
SIGSEGV: altstack
Notifications: epoll
Architecture:…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm trying to deploy a web application which uses F# 4.0 on Windows Server 2008.
It works on my computer where VS2010 is installed but it doesn't work on the server. Everytime you open the page you'll get this error message:
Could not load file or assembly 'FSharp.Core, Version=4.0.0.0, Culture=neutral…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm using FSharp.Compiler.CodeDom to dynamically create F# classes. The problem is, that I have both VS2008 and VS2010 on my computer side-by-side (they works fine), and using F# in this configuration is buggy at best:
If I don't install InstallFSharp.msi, then under VS2008 the built classes complain…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users
of this site have thought about it as well.
In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users
of this site have thought about it as well.
In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I recently started studying functional programming using Haskell and came upon this article on the official Haskell wiki: How to read Haskell.
The article claims that short variable names such as x, xs, and f are fitting for Haskell code, because of conciseness and abstraction. In essence, it claims…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When would you NOT want to use functional programming? What is it not so good at?
I am more looking for disadvantages of the paradigm as a whole, not things like "not widely used", or "no good debugger available". Those answers may be correct as of now, but they deal with FP being a new concept (an…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
It seems to me that functional programming is a great thing. It eliminates state and makes it much easier to automatically make code run in parallel.
Many programmers who were first taught imperative programming styles find it very difficult to learn functional programming, because it is so different…
>>> More
