How to avoid empty implementation in abstract class while implementing an interface?
Posted
by kannan-engr09
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by kannan-engr09
Published on 2010-05-28T11:11:42Z
Indexed on
2010/05/28
11:22 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 460
Filed under:
c#2.0
public interface IMyInterface
{
int A
{get; set; }
string S
{get; set; }
}
public abstract class MyAbs : IMyInterface
{ }
public class ConcreteClass : MyAbs
{
/* Implementation of IMyInterface*/
}
Is it possible to omit the empty implementation in an abstract class as above? If so, how? why?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
