Posted
by JtR
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by JtR
Published on 2009-06-22T16:41:19Z
Indexed on
2010/05/28
8:21 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 252
What does it mean in practice? What is non-reactive programming? Wikipedia has quite abstract description of it.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users
of this site have thought about it as well.
In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming…
>>> More
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
This question has been going through my mind quite a lot lately and since I haven't found a convincing answer to it I would like to know if other users
of this site have thought about it as well.
In the recent years, even though OOP is still the most popular programming paradigm, functional programming…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I recently started studying functional programming using Haskell and came upon this article on the official Haskell wiki: How to read Haskell.
The article claims that short variable names such as x, xs, and f are fitting for Haskell code, because of conciseness and abstraction. In essence, it claims…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When would you NOT want to use functional programming? What is it not so good at?
I am more looking for disadvantages of the paradigm as a whole, not things like "not widely used", or "no good debugger available". Those answers may be correct as of now, but they deal with FP being a new concept (an…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
It seems to me that functional programming is a great thing. It eliminates state and makes it much easier to automatically make code run in parallel.
Many programmers who were first taught imperative programming styles find it very difficult to learn functional programming, because it is so different…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
What does it mean in practice? What is non-reactive programming? Wikipedia has quite abstract description of it.
>>> More
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
jQuery is a Javascript library and framework, but when we are programming
with jQuery into DOM problems/solutions,
we can practice a style quite different of programming... We can read about jQuery at Wikipedia,
The set of jQuery core features — DOM element selections, traversal and manipulation…
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is it possible to apply reactive frame work to MVC application? or is it applicable for WPF?
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
What is LINQ to events a.k.a RX Framework aka the Reactive Extensions in .NET 4.0 (but also available as backported versions)?
In other words, what is all the stuff in System.Reactive.dll for?
>>> More
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
A reactive task is sometimes seen in the IOI programming competition. Unlike batch tasks, reactive solutions take input from another program as well as outputting it. The program typically 'query' the judge program a certain number of times, then output a final answer.
An example
The client program…
>>> More
