Does anyone else think instance variables are problematic in database-backed applications?

Posted by Ben Aston on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Ben Aston
Published on 2010-05-31T13:00:18Z Indexed on 2010/05/31 13:03 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 177

It occurs to me that state control in languages like C# is not well supported.

By this, I mean, it is left upto the programmer to manage the state of in-memory objects. A common use-case is that instance variables in the domain-model are copies of information residing in persistent storage (i.e. the database). Clearly this violates the single point of authority principle, and "synchronisation" has to be managed by the developer.

I envisage a system where instead of instance variables, we have simple public access/mutator methods marked with attributes that link them to the database, and where reads and writes are mediated by a framework that decides whether to hit the database. Does such a system exist?

Am I completely missing the point, or is there some truth to this idea?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about imperative-programming

Related posts about state-management