Help on choosing which SQL Server 2008 scale-out solution to pick (replication, ...)

Posted by usr on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by usr
Published on 2010-06-03T10:46:41Z Indexed on 2010/06/03 15:44 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 125

I am currently crossing the jungle of SQL Server scale-out technologies like replication, log-shipping, mirroring... I have the following constraints on my choice:

  • I want the read-only load to be spread accross the primary and the secondary (mirror, subscriber) server
    • Write load can be sent directly to the primary server
    • The solution should be nearly maintainance free. Schema changes should just replicate to the secondary server (attention: replication has some serious constraints here as it seems)
    • Written data should be accessible very quickly (in under 1s, but better would be instantaneously) on the secondary server
    • On server failure I can tollerate up to one hour of data loss easily. I am more concerned with easy scalability

Here are some options for what I could pick: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb510414.aspx. Any experience you could share?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server

Related posts about sql-server-2008