What's the big deal with brute force on hashes like MD5

Posted by Jan Kuboschek on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Jan Kuboschek
Published on 2010-06-09T21:13:45Z Indexed on 2010/06/09 21:22 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 160

Filed under:
|
|
|

I just spent some time reading http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2768248/is-md5-really-that-bad (I highly recommend!).

In it, it talks about hash collisions. Maybe I'm missing something here, but can't you just encrypt your password using, say, MD5 and then, say, SHA-1 (or any other, doesn't matter.) Wouldn't this increase the processing power required to brute-force the hash and reduce the possibility of collision?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about security

Related posts about hash