Is Using Tuples in my .NET 4.0 Code a Poor Design Decision?
        Posted  
        
            by Jason Webb
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by Jason Webb
        
        
        
        Published on 2010-06-10T18:33:11Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/06/11
            14:52 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 215
        
With the addition of the Tuple class in .net 4, I have been trying to decide if using them in my design is a bad choice or not. The way I see it, a Tuple can be a shortcut to writing a result class (I am sure there are other uses too).
So this:
public class ResultType
{
    public string StringValue { get; set; }
    public int IntValue { get; set; }
}
public ResultType GetAClassedValue()
{
    //..Do Some Stuff
    ResultType result = new ResultType { StringValue = "A String", IntValue = 2 };
    return result;
}
Is equivalent to this:
public Tuple<string, int> GetATupledValue()
{
    //...Do Some stuff
    Tuple<string, int> result = new Tuple<string, int>("A String", 2);
    return result;
}
So setting aside the possibility that I am missing the point of Tuples, is the example with a Tuple a bad design choice?  To me it seems like less clutter, but not as self documenting and clean.  Meaning that with the type ResultType, it is very clear later on what each part of the class means but you have extra code to maintain.  With the Tuple<string, int> you will need to look up and figure out what each Item represents, but you write and maintain less code.
Any experience you have had with this choice would be greatly appreciated.
© Stack Overflow or respective owner