Physical Cores vs Virtual Cores in Parallelism
        Posted  
        
            by Code Curiosity
        on Stack Overflow
        
        See other posts from Stack Overflow
        
            or by Code Curiosity
        
        
        
        Published on 2010-06-11T17:19:14Z
        Indexed on 
            2010/06/11
            17:22 UTC
        
        
        Read the original article
        Hit count: 269
        
When it comes to virtualization, I have been deliberating on the relationship between the physical cores and the virtual cores, especially in how it effects applications employing parallelism. For example, in a VM scenario, if there are less physical cores than there are virtual cores, if that's possible, what's the effect or limits placed on the application's parallel processing? I'm asking, because in my environment, it's not disclosed as to what the physical architecture is. Is there still much advantage to parallelizing if the application lives on a dual core VM hosted on a single core physical machine?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner