On Server Disk Storage VS SAN Storage

Posted by Justin on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by Justin
Published on 2011-01-05T22:56:38Z Indexed on 2011/01/05 23:55 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 525

Filed under:

san

Hello, I am looking at buying three servers, and trying to figure out which storage solution makes the most sense in terms of performance and cost.

Total budget is around: $10,000.

OPTION 1: Dell servers with RAID 10 (4 Drives) each 7200RPM SAS 500GB, for a total capacity of 1TB. Each server is approx: $3000. Total storage then across all three servers is 3TB.

OPTION 2: Same Dell servers with a cheap single drive no RAID for $2000 and go with a centralized SAN solution.

The biggest problem is that I haven't been able to even find a SAN solution that is a reasonable price. Dell entry level storage servers are like $15,000. I am thinking just iSCSI, not fiber (too expensive).

What do you guys recommend?

Related posts about san

Connection lost to iscsi san after problem with san

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hi there, We have a cluster running with 3 VSpere ESX4 server that all are connected to a lefthand san through iSCSI. This all worked well but a week ago there was a problem with the san. After fixing that problem the VMWARE server continued working but this weekend I saw that 1 server didn't have… >>> More
SAN performance issues storing SQL Server tempdb on a SAN that's being backed up

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I'm afraid I don't know much about SAN's so please forgive my lack of detail or technical terms. As a developer I've just completed and put on an existing production system a new application but it would appear to have tipped the scales regarding the performance of the backups being taken from the… >>> More
cPanel web servers mounting home partition to a NAS or SAN

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hello, I currently have 2 cPanel web servers that are little 1RU dual cpu quad core xeons. They have a lot of resources for processing and handling web requests, and never exceed more than 10% cpu usage. They also have plenty of RAM. The problem is though that they both have RAID 1 160Gb SAS hard… >>> More
SAN with iSCSI-Target Performance Horrendous

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
We have a poor man's SAN setup in a 1U Ubuntu server running iSCSI-Target with two 300GB drives in RAID-0. We then are using it for block level storage for virtual machines. The hypervisor is connected to the SAN via gigabit on a dedicated VLAN and interfaces. We only have a single virtual machine… >>> More
2 Server FC SAN Configuration

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I have 2 identical servers: -48GB Ram -8GigE NIC's -2FC NIC's -2x72GB RAID1 Hard Drives -Server 2008R2 Host I also Have a Fibre Channel SAN: -16x146GB RAID10 Hard Drives -2xDual-port FC Controllers (Controller A and B both have ports 1 and 2) -Server 1 has Fiber to Ports A1 and B1 -Server 2 has Fiber… >>> More

Developer IT

On Server Disk Storage VS SAN Storage - Developer IT

On Server Disk Storage VS SAN Storage

san

Related posts about san

Connection lost to iscsi san after problem with san

SAN performance issues storing SQL Server tempdb on a SAN that's being backed up

cPanel web servers mounting home partition to a NAS or SAN

SAN with iSCSI-Target Performance Horrendous

2 Server FC SAN Configuration

Categories cloud