Does it exist: smart pointer, owned by one object allowing access.

Posted by Noah Roberts on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Noah Roberts
Published on 2011-01-15T03:28:37Z Indexed on 2011/01/15 3:53 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 198

Filed under:
|

I'm wondering if anyone's run across anything that exists which would fill this need.

Object A contains an object B. It wants to provide access to that B to clients through a pointer (maybe there's the option it could be 0, or maybe the clients need to be copiable and yet hold references...whatever). Clients, lets call them object C, would normally, if we're perfect developers, be written carefully so as to not violate the lifetime semantics of any pointer to B they might have...but we're not perfect, in fact we're pretty dumb half the time.

So what we want is for object C to have a pointer to object B that is not "shared" ownership but that is smart enough to recognize a situation in which the pointer is no longer valid, such as when object A is destroyed or it destroys object B. Accessing this pointer when it's no longer valid would cause an assertion/exception/whatever.

In other words, I wish to share access to data in a safe, clear way but retain the original ownership semantics. Currently, because I've not been able to find any shared pointer in which one of the objects owns it, I've been using shared_ptr in place of having such a thing. But I want clear owneship and shared/weak pointer doesn't really provide that.

Would be nice further if this smart pointer could be attached to member variables and not just hold pointers to dynamically allocated memory regions.

If it doesn't exist I'm going to make it, so I first want to know if someone's already released something out there that does it.

And, BTW, I do realize that things like references and pointers do provide this sort of thing...I'm looking for something smarter.

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++

Related posts about smart-pointers