What is the purpose of the "non-endorsement clause" in the New BSD license?

Posted by Joey Adams on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Joey Adams
Published on 2011-01-29T06:21:46Z Indexed on 2011/01/29 7:33 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 452

Filed under:

license

|

mit-license

|

bsd-license

Note: This question is not about the "obnoxious BSD advertising clause". The New BSD license does not contain that clause, and is compatible with the GPL.

I'm trying to pick between the New BSD license and the MIT license for my own projects. They are essentially identical, except the BSD license contains the following clause:

Neither the name of the <organization> nor the names of its contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without specific prior written permission.

Why would anyone want to use this clause? What's wrong with gaining some notoriety if someone makes a well-known piece of software using your code? Also, wouldn't dictating what users can and cannot do with your given name fall outside the domain of intellectual property?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about license

The Apache License, v2.0: Copyright License vs Patent License

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
The Apache License, v2.0 [..] 2. Grant of Copyright License Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, each Contributor hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable copyright license to reproduce, prepare Derivative… >>> More
Cryptographic Validation Explained

as seen on Geeks with Blogs - Search for 'Geeks with Blogs'
We have been using LogicNP’s CryptoLicensing for some of our software and I was battling to understand how exactly the whole process worked. I was sent the following document which really helped explain it – so if you ever use the same tool it is well worth a read. Licensing Basics LogicNP CryptoLicensing… >>> More
individual license to volume license

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hello, my company has about 100 computer each using individual licenses for MS Office and Windows. We are looking to upgrade about 50 computers. We, in the past, have used Dell as our main supplier of PCs and would like to continue with them. What would be the best route for us in upgrading these… >>> More
Is there an alternative to Google Code Search?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Per the Official Google Blog: Code Search, which was designed to help people search for open source code all over the web, will be shut down along with the Code Search API on January 15, 2012. Google Code Search is now gone, and since that makes it much harder to understand the features… >>> More
InstallShield 2010 with license - no license for automatic build system (CI) as Windows service

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I really need help here. We are using CI build-process (Hudson) as an automated build system using Msbuild. The CI run in Apache Tomcat 6 that run under the credentials of a domain user (not a local Windows user ). Every time the CI try to build an InstallShield project (using isproj files) we get… >>> More

Related posts about mit-license

how to properly credit authors of MIT license program

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Although I have found similar questions on this site they were not what I was looking for. I have modified the source code of an MIT licensed project, and I have added new classes to it as well. Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think that it is legal to add my copyright notice above the license… >>> More
Question about the MIT License and open/closed source

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hallo, I have a small useful application (Websites managment tool developed in Java) which I want to publish online for free (every one can use it for free). But I do not want to make it opne source yet. It is additional affort to clean up the code, documantation and so on... And this is just a… >>> More
Question about the MIT License and open/clsoed source

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hallo, I have a small useful application (Websites managment tool developed in Java) which I want to publish online for free (every one can use it for free). But I do not want to make it opne source yet. It is additional affort to clean up the code, documantation and so on... And this is just a… >>> More
LGPL to MIT License

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to release code I am working on which uses third party code licensed under the LGPL, under for instance the MIT License? Basically I dont want to change the license of the LGPL part, I am just wondering what happens with it if I chose a different license for… >>> More
Proprietary software based on MIT license.

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
As far as I understand. I can use a project licensed under MIT license into a proprietary software. Am I right? It dosen't force any copyleft and I don't have to say that my project is based on something else. That means I can fork the hell out of it, right? Can someone shed some light over this? >>> More