How do I handle a Controller that's not controlling a specific Model?

Posted by Ben Brocka on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Ben Brocka
Published on 2012-04-12T19:29:52Z Indexed on 2012/04/12 23:43 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 283

Filed under:

I've got a nice MVC set up going but my website requires some views that don't map directly to a model. Specifically I've got some generic Reports users need to run, and now I'm creating a utility for comparing some system configurations.

Right now the logic is crammed into a Reports Controller and I'm starting a Comparison Controller but this feels like a big abuse of the system. Both controllers use an assortment of different Models to pull data from, and they're only related based on what the user is doing. Reports are run from the Reports Controller and their views are all grouped together in the file system/URL structure.

Is this an acceptable use of the Controller paradigm? I can't think of a better way to structure my Controllers, and making a Controller for each model I'm using to make reports/ect doesn't seem like a good idea; I'd end up with one Controller/Model/View per report or comparison, vastly complicating the apparent structure of my site.

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about mvc