Use Cherokee Instead of nginx in Front of Varnish to Get HTTP 1.1 Optimizations?

Posted by espeed on Server Fault See other posts from Server Fault or by espeed
Published on 2011-04-18T07:56:03Z Indexed on 2012/09/26 21:40 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 240

Filed under:
|
|
|
|

We have been running nginx -> uWSGI, and now we are evaluating putting Varnish as a caching layer between nginx and uWSGI (similar to http://www.heroku.com/how/architecture).

But, nginx only supports HTTP 1.0 on the back so it will have to create new connections with Varnish for each request.

Many recommend running nginx in front of Varnish, but wouldn't it make much more sense to use something like Cherokee so that you eliminate the HTTP connection overhead since it supports HTTP 1.1 on the back?

© Server Fault or respective owner

Related posts about nginx

Related posts about http