Do you use i-->0 for backward loops?

Posted by maaartinus on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by maaartinus
Published on 2011-04-25T20:07:58Z Indexed on 2012/11/14 11:18 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 176

Filed under:

syntax

Some people write

for (int i=N; i-->0; ) doSomething(i);

instead of

for (int i=N-1; i>=0; --i) doSomething(i);

for backward loops. The --> "operator"¹ looks very confusing at the first glance, but it's trivial:
i-->0 simply parses as (i--)>0, and once you get it, you see it immediately.

The main disadvantage is the strange look. The advantage is that you'll get it always right (unlike the more verbose version offering the possibility to forget something, which really happened to me a couple of times).

What do you think about using the --> "operator"?

¹First time I saw the funny term in a comment to this question today.

Related posts about syntax

learning to make sense of the syntax of syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i want to use alter table but the syntax posted here: http://dev.mysql.com/doc/refman/5.1/en/alter-table.html is very confusing i do not understand what the [ ] mean or the { } mean or the pipes is there some kind of tutorial that can help me understand this? >>> More
C syntax or binary optimized syntax?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Let's take an simple example of two lines supposedly doing the same thing: if (value = 96 || value < 0) ... or if (value & ~ 95) ... Say 'If's are costly in a loop of thousands of iterations, is it better to keep with the traditional C syntax or better to find a binary optimized one if… >>> More
If you had to reinvent a new syntax for regular expressions, what would it look like?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
Regular expressions as they are today are pretty much as concise and compact as they can be. Consequently, they are often criticised for being unreadable and hard to debug. If you had to reinvent a new syntax for regular expressions, what would it look like? Do you prefer the concise syntax they… >>> More
online utility to convert jquery syntax to mootools syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there any online utility to convert jquery syntax to mootools syntax? Is there any guideline to convert jquery to mootools? >>> More
Transform XAML syntax from Shorthand to full syntax

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Is there a tool or a simple way to transform XAML code from the shorthand syntax to the full syntax? For example: moving from something like: <_TextBox Text="{Binding Path=Formula.Production, Mode=TwoWay, UpdateSourceTrigger=PropertyChanged}" to <_TextBox <_TextBox.Text <Binding… >>> More

Developer IT