null values vs "empty" singleton for optional fields

Posted by Uko on Programmers See other posts from Programmers or by Uko
Published on 2012-11-23T09:16:10Z Indexed on 2012/11/23 11:15 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 287

Filed under:
|
|
|

First of all I'm developing a parser for an XML-based format for 3D graphics called XGL. But this question can be applied to any situation when you have fields in your class that are optional i.e. the value of this field can be missing.

As I was taking a Scala course on coursera there was an interesting pattern when you create an abstract class with all the methods you need and then create a normal fully functional subclass and an "empty" singleton subclass that always returns false for isEmpty method and throws exceptions for the other ones.

So my question is: is it better to just assign null if the optional field's value is missing or make a hierarchy described above and assign it an empty singleton implementation?

© Programmers or respective owner

Related posts about scala

Related posts about singleton