Error handling in C++, constructors vs. regular methods

Posted by Dennis Ritchie on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Dennis Ritchie
Published on 2012-12-02T09:43:37Z Indexed on 2012/12/02 11:04 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 217

Filed under:

I have a cheesesales.txt CSV file with all of my recent cheese sales. I want to create a class CheeseSales that can do things like these:

CheeseSales sales("cheesesales.txt"); //has no default constructor
cout << sales.totalSales() << endl;
sales.outputPieChart("piechart.pdf");

The above code assumes that no failures will happen. In reality, failures will take place. In this case, two kinds of failures could occur:

  • Failure in the constructor: The file may not exist, may not have read-permissions, contain invalid/unparsable data, etc.
  • Failure in the regular method: The file may already exist, there may not be write access, too little sales data available to create a pie chart, etc.

My question is simply: How would you design this code to handle failures?

One idea: Return a bool from the regular method indicating failure. Not sure how to deal with the constructor.

How would seasoned C++ coders do these kinds of things?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about c++