Introducing Oracle Multitenant

Posted by OracleMultitenant on Oracle Blogs See other posts from Oracle Blogs or by OracleMultitenant
Published on Tue, 25 Jun 2013 19:06:30 +0000 Indexed on 2013/06/25 22:25 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 270

Filed under:

The First Database Designed for the Cloud

Today Oracle announced the general availability (GA) of Oracle Database 12c, the first database designed for the Cloud. Oracle Multitenant, new with Oracle Database 12c, is a key component of this – a new architecture for consolidating databases and simplifying operations in the Cloud. With this, the inaugural post in the Multitenant blog, my goal is to start the conversation about Oracle Multitenant. We are very proud of this new architecture, which we view as a major advance for Oracle. Customers, partners and analysts who have had previews are very excited about its capabilities and its flexibility.

This high level review of Oracle Multitenant will touch on our design considerations and how we re-architected our database for the cloud. I’ll briefly describe our new multitenant architecture and explain it’s key benefits. Finally I’ll mention some of the major use cases we see for Oracle Multitenant.

Industry Trends

We always start by talking to our customers about the pressures and challenges they’re facing and what trends they’re seeing in the industry.

Some things don’t change. They face the same pressures and the same requirements as ever: Pressure to do more with less; be faster, leaner, cheaper, and deliver services 24/7. Big companies have achieved scale. Now they want to realize economies of scale. As ever, DBAs are faced with the challenges of patching and upgrading large numbers of databases, and provisioning new ones. 

Requirements are familiar: Performance, scalability, reliability and high availability are non-negotiable. They need ever more security in this threatening climate. There’s no time to stop and retool with new applications.

What’s new are the trends. These are the techniques to use to respond to these pressures within the constraints of the requirements. With the advent of cloud computing and availability of massively powerful servers – even engineered systems such as Exadata – our customers want to consolidate many applications into fewer larger servers. There’s a move to standardized services – even self-service.

Consolidation

Consolidation is not new; companies have tried various different approaches to consolidation of databases in the cloud.

One approach is to partition a powerful server between several virtual machines, one per application. A downside of this is that you have the resource and management overheads of OS and RDBMS per VM – that is, per application. Another is that you have replaced physical sprawl with virtual sprawl and virtual sprawl is still expensive to manage.

In the dedicated database model, we have a single physical server supporting multiple databases, one per application. So there’s a shared OS overhead, but RDBMS process and memory overhead are replicated per application. Let's think about our traditional Oracle Database architecture. Every time we create a database, be it a production database, a development or a test database, what do we do? We create a set of files, we allocate a bunch of memory for managing the data, and we kick off a series of background processes. This is replicated for every one of the databases that we create. As more and more databases are fired up, these replicated overheads quickly consume the available server resources and this limits the number of applications we can run on any given server.

In Oracle Database 11g and earlier the highest degree of consolidation could be achieved by what we call schema consolidation. In this model we have one big server with one big database. Individual applications are installed in separate schemas or table-owners.

Database overheads are shared between all applications, which affords maximum consolidation. The shortcomings are that application changes are often required.

There is no tenant isolation. One bad apple can spoil the whole batch.

New Architecture & Benefits

In Oracle Database 12c, we have a new multitenant architecture, featuring pluggable databases. This delivers all the resource utilization advantages of schema consolidation with none of the downsides. There are two parts to the term “pluggable database”:

  • "pluggable", which is new, and
  • "database", which is familiar. 

Before we get to the exciting new stuff let’s discuss what hasn’t changed. A pluggable database is a fully functional Oracle database. It’s not watered down in any way. From the perspective of an application or an end user it hasn’t changed at all. This is very important because it means that no application changes are required to adopt this new architecture. There are many thousands of applications built on Oracle databases and they are all ready to run on Oracle Multitenant.

So we have these self-contained pluggable databases (PDBs), and as their name suggests, they are plugged into a multitenant container database (CDB). The CDB behaves as a single database from the operations point of view. Very much as we had with the schema consolidation model, we only have a single set of Oracle background processes and a single, shared database memory requirement. This gives us very high consolidation density, which affords maximum reduction in capital expenses (CapEx). By performing management operations at the CDB level – “managing many as one” – we can achieve great reductions in operating expenses (OpEx) as well, but we retain granular control where appropriate. Furthermore, the “pluggability” capability gives us portability and this adds a tremendous amount of agility. We can simply unplug a PDB from one CDB and plug it into another CDB, for example to move it from one SLA tier to another.

I'll explore all these new capabilities in much more detail in a future posting. 

Use Cases

We can identify a number of use cases for Oracle Multitenant. Here are a few of the major ones.

  • Development / Testing
    • where individual engineers need rapid provisioning and recycling of private copies of a few "master test databases"
  • Consolidation of disparate applications
    • using fewer, more powerful servers
  • Software as a Service
    • deploying separate copies of identical applications to individual tenants
  • Database as a Service
    • typically self-service provisioning of databases on the private cloud
  • Application Distribution from ISV / Installation by Customer
    • Eliminating many typical installation steps (create schema, import seed data, import application code PL/SQL…) - just plug in a PDB!
  • High volume data distribution
    • literally via disk drives in envelopes distributed by truck! - distribution of things like GIS or MDM master databases
  • …various others!

Benefits

Previous approaches to consolidation have involved a trade-off between reductions in Capital Expenses (CapEx) and Operating Expenses (OpEx), and they’ve usually come at the expense of agility. With Oracle Multitenant you can have your cake and eat it:

  • Minimize CapEx
    • More Applications per server
  • Minimize OpEx
    • Manage many as one
    • Standardized procedures and services
    • Rapid provisioning
  • Maximize Agility
    • Cloning for development and testing
    • Portability through pluggability
    • Scalability with RAC
  • Ease of Adoption
    • Applications run unchanged

It’s a pure deployment choice. Neither the database backend nor the application needs to be changed.

In future postings I’ll explore various aspects in more detail. However, if you feel compelled to devour everything you can about Oracle Multitenant this very minute, have no fear. Visit the Multitenant page on OTN and explore the various resources we have available there. Among these, Oracle Distinguished Product Manager Bryn Llewellyn has written an excellent, thorough, and exhaustively detailed White Paper about Oracle Multitenant, which is available here

Follow me 

I tweet @OraclePDB #OracleMultitenant

© Oracle Blogs or respective owner

Related posts about /Oracle