Search Results

Search found 23 results on 1 pages for 'authenticode'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Get timestamp from Authenticode Signed files in .NET

    - by SlavaGu
    We need to verify that binary files are signed properly with digital signature (Authenticode). This can be achieved with signtool.exe pretty easily. However, we need an automatic way that also verifies signer name and timestamp. This is doable in native C++ with CryptQueryObject() API as shown in this wonderful sample: How To Get Information from Authenticode Signed Executables However we live in a managed world :) hence looking for C# solution to the same problem. Straight approach would be to pInvoke Crypt32.dll and all is done. But there is similar managed API in System.Security.Cryptography.X509Certificates Namespace. X509Certificate2 Class seems to provide some information but no timestamp. Now we came to the original question how can we get that timestamp of a digital signature in C Sharp?

    Read the article

  • Find out if assembly is signed with Authenticode

    - by crauscher
    I use an assembly of a 3rd party vendor. In an older version this assembly used authenticode. This caused the assembly loading to last quiet long. The developer of the vendor told me that the new version is not signed with authenticode. How can I check if this is true. On my development machine the assembly loading was quiet fast. Only on client machines it took quiet a while. Is it possible to check this using a network sniffer? Regards

    Read the article

  • Verify Authenticode signature as being from our company for automatic updater

    - by James Johnston
    I am implementing an automatic update feature and need some advice on how to do this securely using best practices. I would like to use the downloaded file's Authenticode signature to verify that it is safe to run (i.e. originates from our company and hasn't been tampered with). My question is very similar to question #2008519. The bottom-line question: what's the best, most secure way to check Authenticode signatures for an automatic update feature? What fields in the certificate should be checked? Requirements being: (1) check signature is valid, (2) check it's my signature, (3) old clients can still update when my certificate expires and I get a new one. Here's some background information / ideas from my research: I believe this could be broken into two steps: Verify that the signature is valid. I believe this should be easy using WinVerifyTrust as outlined in http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa382384(VS.85).aspx - I don't expect problems here. Verify that the signature corresponds to our company, and not another company. This seems to be a more difficult question to answer: One possibility is to check some of the strings in the signature. Could be obtained via code at MS KB article #323809, but this article doesn't make recommendations on what fields should be checked for this type of application (or any other, for that matter). Question #1072540 also illustrates how to get some certificate info, but again doesn't recommend what fields to actually check. My concern is that the strings might not be the best check: what if another person is able to obtain a certificate with the same name, for example? Or if there's a valid reason for us to change the strings in the future? The person at question #2008519 has a very similar requirement. His need for a "TrustedByUs" function is identical to mine. However, he goes about doing the check by comparing public keys. While this would work in the short-term, it seems like it won't work for an automatic update feature. This is because code signing certificates are only valid for 2 - 3 years max. Therefore, in the future, when we buy a new certificate in 2 years, the old clients wouldn't be able to update any more due to the change in public key.

    Read the article

  • How to sign installation files of a Visual Studio .msi

    - by Alex
    This may be a duplicate, though I can't find it at this time. If so please point me in the right direction. I recently purchased an authenticode certificate from globalsign and am having problems signing my files for deployment. There are a couple of .exe files that are generated by a project and then put into a .msi. When I sign the .exe files with the signtool the certificate is valid and they run fine. The problem is that when I build the .msi (using the visual studio setup project) the .exe files loose their signatures. So I can sign the .msi after it is built, but the installed .exe files continue the whole "unknown publisher" business. How can I retain the signature on these files for installation on the client machine? You help is appreciated. -Alex

    Read the article

  • How do i use signtool.exe correctly in hudson running as a service?

    - by Tim
    I just purchased a code signing cert (MS authenticode) from THAWTE and have installed it apparently on my build machine. I am logged in as a user and when I open a cmd prompt I can sign EXEs using the cert with signtool.exe. Unfortunately this same command line does not work in the hudson process that is running on the machine. the error message I get is: SignTool Error: No certificates were found that met all the given criteria. I presume this is because the hudson service is running under a different account than the account that I ran signtool.exe from and from the account I used to get the cert from thawte. So, my question is: How do I fix this problem? I thought i was going to download a file from thawte, but instead it just used IE somehow to install the cert in the user's cache magically. I probably want to export (or whatever the correct term is) to a file that I can store/save or use on any other machine. How do i do that and how do I call signtool correctly with either the file or the cert from another user in the system/services account?

    Read the article

  • Heads-Up! VeriSign Code Signing (Microsoft Authenticode) Certificates $99.00

    - by Edward Boyle
    Recently I posted an article about my Code Signing certificate from GoDaddy. I went with GoDaddy because it is an accepted certificate that should bring no problems; I would have preferred a VeriSign certificate but could not justify the extra $400.00 for the brand considering it truly was not required to meet my needs. I have been around since the day where VeriSign was really the only certificate (SSL) you could get unless you went with the then rogue South African company Thawte, since acquired by VeriSign. Today, I feel out of the loop – very out of the loop. I went to check into Windows Logo requirements, this leads me to this page, that then leads me to this page where I click on the “Digital Certificate’s” Link that leads to this page: So just a heads-up, $99.00 Code Signing Certificate from VeriSign!

    Read the article

  • How can I sign an ActiveX control with a code signing certificate and be a verified publisher?

    - by davidcl
    I'm trying to sing an ActiveX control with a code signing certificate issued by Thawte. I was able to successfully sign the control using signtool.exe. When I look at the file properties, it says "The certificate in the signature cannot be verified." When I view the certificate it says "Windows does not have enough information to verify the certificate." On the certification path tab, it says "The issuer of this certificate cannot be found." In internet explorer, the certificate is recognized as signed but the user receives warnings that the publisher is not verified. I've tried creating a single PFX file containing my certificate along with the root and intermediate certificates that chain to my Thawte developer certificate, and then re-signing the control using that PFX file. No dice. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • When/why does Internet Explorer block installation of a (signed) ActiveX control?

    - by Geoff
    When the user visits a page that contains a signed ActiveX control that has never been seen before, I'd expect IE to ask the user for permission to install the control. But sometimes IE puts up a security warning instead. For example, consider this site, which has a test control: http://www.pcpitstop.com/testax.asp I'd expect to get this message -- and sometimes, I do: "The website wants to run the following add-on: 'XXX' from 'YYY'. If you trust the the website and the add-on and want to allow it to run, click here..." But under IE8 on XP, I usually get this instead: "To help protect your security, Internet Explorer has restricted this site from showing certain content. Click here for options..." What's going on? Any ideas? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Why is my code signing (MS authenticode) verification failing?

    - by Tim
    I posted this question and have a freshly minted code signing cert from Thawte. I followed the instructions (or so I thought) and the code signing claims to be done right, however when I try to verify the tool shows an error. I have no idea what it means and no idea how to fix this. Any comments would be appreciated. Command line to sign exe: signtool sign /f mdt.pfx /p password /t http://timestamp.verisign.com/scripts/timstamp.dll test.exe Results: The following certificate was selected: Issued to: [my company] Issued by: Thawte Code Signing CA Expires: 4/23/2011 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: 7D1A42364765F8969E83BC00AB77F901118F3601 Done Adding Additional Store Attempting to sign: test.exe Successfully signed and timestamped: test.exe Number of files successfully Signed: 1 Number of warnings: 0 Number of errors: 0 Note that there are no errors or warnings. Now, when I try to verify imagine my surprise: signtool verify /v test.exe results in: Verifying: test.exe SHA1 hash of file: 490BA0656517D3A322D19F432F1C6D40695CAD22 Signing Certificate Chain: Issued to: Thawte Premium Server CA Issued by: Thawte Premium Server CA Expires: 12/31/2020 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: 627F8D7827656399D27D7F9044C9FEB3F33EFA9A Issued to: Thawte Code Signing CA Issued by: Thawte Premium Server CA Expires: 8/5/2013 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: A706BA1ECAB6A2AB18699FC0D7DD8C7DE36F290F Issued to: [my company] Issued by: Thawte Code Signing CA Expires: 4/23/2011 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: 7D1A42364765F8969E83BC00AB77F901118F3601 The signature is timestamped: 4/27/2010 10:19:19 AM Timestamp Verified by: Issued to: Thawte Timestamping CA Issued by: Thawte Timestamping CA Expires: 12/31/2020 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: BE36A4562FB2EE05DBB3D32323ADF445084ED656 Issued to: VeriSign Time Stamping Services CA Issued by: Thawte Timestamping CA Expires: 12/3/2013 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: F46AC0C6EFBB8C6A14F55F09E2D37DF4C0DE012D Issued to: VeriSign Time Stamping Services Signer - G2 Issued by: VeriSign Time Stamping Services CA Expires: 6/14/2012 7:59:59 PM SHA1 hash: ADA8AAA643FF7DC38DD40FA4C97AD559FF4846DE Number of files successfully Verified: 0 Number of warnings: 0 Number of errors: 1

    Read the article

  • Windows driver signing

    - by Artem Smolny
    My company is developing driver for our hardware. Now I need to sign my driver for 32 and 64 bit platforms. Please tell, now I need to buy Authenticode certificate, right? What CA to use? DigiCert? GlobalSign? ( http://www.sslshopper.com/microsoft-authenticode-certificates.html ) Symantec? ( http://www.symantec.com/verisign/code-signing/microsoft-authenticode ) What is the difference between this CA offers? I need to use tools from WDK?

    Read the article

  • What do I need to do to make sure my app launches as Admin?

    - by John Gietzen
    I'm writing an app that allows you to script the buttons from a wiimote into actions on your PC. It currently supports all of the features of the main remote control, except for the speaker. Now, I'm running in to trouble when I run it on Vista with UAC turned on. Any time a UAC'd window has focus, my app fails to move the mouse successfully. For instance, when an installer is run, I have to navigate it with the keyboard. Will running the app as administrator solve my problem? (At one point in time, I was able to successfully move the mouse over a UAC-password-entry box) How do I build a manifest that will tell windows to "run as administrator"? How do I embed this manifest into my app, if I'm strongly naming my assembly? How do I sign my application with an Authenticode cert? EDIT: Ok, so after some more extensive research, I have found: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb756929.aspx <requestedExecutionLevel level="asInvoker|highestAvailable|requireAdministrator" uiAccess="true|false"/> However, the article says: Applications with the uiAccess flag set to true must be Authenticode signed to start properly. In addition, the application must reside in a protected location in the file system. \Program Files\ and \windows\system32\ are currently the two allowable protected locations. I have edited the question to reflect the new developments.

    Read the article

  • "Error encountered while BER decoding" in Adobe Acrobat Pro X when applying timestamp

    - by djechelon
    I have a tedious problem with Acrobat Pro X 10.1.3.23: when I want to apply a timestamp to a document I always get that error. I have configured VeriSign TSA server http://timestamp.verisign.com/scripts/timstamp.dll and it returns that error. I have tried Comodo CA http://timestamp.comodoca.com/authenticode and Aruba https://servizi.arubapec.it/tsa/ngrequest.php but all three returned the same exact error. My PDFs are now signed without a certified timestamp and this is a problem for me. I'm obliged to sign documents and apply a certified timestamp at the same time. This seems to be a common error in Acrobat, but I found no solution to it. Can somebody help me?

    Read the article

  • Can't install any drivers at all on Windows 8. Error 0x000003F9

    - by ABarney
    I suddenly can't install any drivers at all on my Windows 8 Pro x64 install. It doesn't matter what kind of driver it is, nothing will install. Everything ends with error 0x000003F9: The system has attempted to load or restore a file into the registry, but the specified file is not in a registry file format. When Windows Update tries to install a driver, it just gives error code 800703F9 and says that "Windows Update ran into a problem." I've already done a scan of system files with sfc, tried another user account, done a chkdsk, and a few more things, but nothing works. The problem started when I tried to install drivers for my printer earlier today and suddenly started getting messages saying that "Windows Modules Installer has stopped working." I decided to restart and was being greeted with the recovery boot options. I shut the computer down, but when I booted it back up the same thing happened, so I did a repair your pc, and was able to boot into the OS properly. Then I rebooted into my external drive and did a chkdsk on the Windows 8 install that started acting funny. When I booted back into Windows 8, I wasn't able to install any drivers. They all keep coming up with the same error. And I can't seem to find anything at all on this issue. Any help would be much appreciated. Here's an install log from a failed driver install: >>> [Device Install (DiInstallDriver) - F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf] >>> Section start 2012/12/06 20:15:20.714 cmd: "F:\Windows\System32\InfDefaultInstall.exe" "F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf" inf: {SetupCopyOEMInf: F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf} 20:15:20.716 sto: {Import Driver Package: F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf} 20:15:20.719 sto: Driver Store = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore [Online] (6.2.9200) sto: Driver Package = F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf sto: Architecture = amd64 sto: Flags = 0x00000000 inf: Provider = Google, Inc. inf: Class GUID = {3f966bd9-fa04-4ec5-991c-d326973b5128} inf: Driver Version = 08/27/2012,7.0.0.1 inf: Catalog File = androidwinusba64.cat inf: Version Flags = 0x00000011 ! sto: Unable to determine presence of driver package 'android_winusb.inf'. Error = 0x000003F9 flq: Copying 'F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\amd64\WdfCoInstaller01009.dll' to 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\amd64\WdfCoInstaller01009.dll'. flq: Copying 'F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\amd64\WinUSBCoInstaller2.dll' to 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\amd64\WinUSBCoInstaller2.dll'. flq: Copying 'F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\android_winusb.inf' to 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\android_winusb.inf'. flq: Copying 'F:\Android\android-sdk\extras\google\usb_driver\androidwinusba64.cat' to 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\androidwinusba64.cat'. pol: {Driver package policy check} 20:15:20.814 pol: {Driver package policy check - exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:20.814 sto: {Stage Driver Package: F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\android_winusb.inf} 20:15:20.815 ! sto: Unable to determine presence of driver package 'android_winusb.inf'. Error = 0x000003F9 inf: {Query Configurability: F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\android_winusb.inf} 20:15:20.820 inf: Driver package uses WDF. inf: Driver package 'android_winusb.inf' is configurable. inf: {Query Configurability: exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:20.823 flq: Copying 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\amd64\WdfCoInstaller01009.dll' to 'F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\amd64\WdfCoInstaller01009.dll'. flq: Copying 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\amd64\WinUSBCoInstaller2.dll' to 'F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\amd64\WinUSBCoInstaller2.dll'. flq: Copying 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\android_winusb.inf' to 'F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\android_winusb.inf'. flq: Copying 'F:\Users\ALEXBA~1\AppData\Local\Temp\{5da5e23e-2f82-2b4f-b73d-9d77c2978b0e}\androidwinusba64.cat' to 'F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\androidwinusba64.cat'. sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT VALIDATE} 20:15:20.875 sig: {_VERIFY_FILE_SIGNATURE} 20:15:20.881 sig: Key = android_winusb.inf sig: FilePath = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\android_winusb.inf sig: Catalog = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\androidwinusba64.cat ! sig: Verifying file against specific (valid) catalog failed! (0x800b0109) ! sig: Error 0x800b0109: A certificate chain processed, but terminated in a root certificate which is not trusted by the trust provider. sig: {_VERIFY_FILE_SIGNATURE exit(0x800b0109)} 20:15:20.893 sig: {_VERIFY_FILE_SIGNATURE} 20:15:20.893 sig: Key = android_winusb.inf sig: FilePath = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\android_winusb.inf sig: Catalog = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\androidwinusba64.cat sig: Success: File is signed in Authenticode(tm) catalog. sig: Error 0xe0000242: The publisher of an Authenticode(tm) signed catalog has not yet been established as trusted. sig: {_VERIFY_FILE_SIGNATURE exit(0xe0000242)} 20:15:20.907 ! sig: Driver package signer is unknown, but user trusts signer. sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT VALIDATE: exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:22.701 sig: Signer Score = 0x0F000000 sig: Signer Name = Google Inc sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT BEGIN} 20:15:22.702 sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT BEGIN: exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:22.702 cpy: {Copy Directory: F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}} 20:15:22.703 cpy: Target Path = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\android_winusb.inf_amd64_f7c4b212c9d862a3 cpy: {Copy Directory: F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\Temp\{30801e6d-d30f-2f4b-87dc-c80122d5f248}\amd64} 20:15:22.704 cpy: Target Path = F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\android_winusb.inf_amd64_f7c4b212c9d862a3\amd64 cpy: {Copy Directory: exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:22.705 cpy: {Copy Directory: exit(0x00000000)} 20:15:22.706 ! sto: Unable to determine if driver package 'android_winusb.inf' is already registered. Error = 0x000003F9 idb: {Register Driver Package: F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\android_winusb.inf_amd64_f7c4b212c9d862a3\android_winusb.inf} 20:15:22.707 !!! idb: Failed to create driver package object 'android_winusb.inf_amd64_f7c4b212c9d862a3' in DRIVERS database node. Error = 0x000003F9 !!! idb: Failed to register driver package 'F:\Windows\System32\DriverStore\FileRepository\android_winusb.inf_amd64_f7c4b212c9d862a3\android_winusb.inf'. Error = 0x000003F9 idb: {Register Driver Package: exit(0x000003f9)} 20:15:22.709 sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT END} 20:15:22.710 sto: {DRIVERSTORE IMPORT END: exit(0x000003f9)} 20:15:22.710 sto: Rolled back driver package import. !!! sto: Failed to import driver package into Driver Store. Error = 0x000003F9 sto: {Stage Driver Package: exit(0x000003f9)} 20:15:22.736 sto: {Import Driver Package: exit(0x000003f9)} 20:15:22.766

    Read the article

  • Validate signature on EXE with CertGetCertificateChain

    - by cobaia
    I would like to verify a signed executable. The requirement is to validate that the executable itself is valid and where it came from (probably from the subject of the cert). The cert type is PKCS. I found a similar posting here, http://stackoverflow.com/questions/301024/validate-authenticode-signature-on-exe-c-without-capicom The Microsoft documentation, among others, appears to point to CertGetCertificateChain, but the examples tend to work with certificates that are in a store. Does anyone know how to validate a signed executable using CertGetCertificateChain and related API's?

    Read the article

  • How to determine what invokes User Access Control restrictions?

    - by MX4399
    In a Delphi app intended to build an internet software update service for my software, the Windows 7 UAC system requests authorization from the user to run the exe.The following possible contentious/risk areas exist in the code: A named pipe server is created for communications TCP is used for FTP and HTTP SHGetSpecialFolderPath api call is used Before these items where added UAC did not activate, removing each in turn including all unit reference and then ending with the bare bones exe still causes the UAC event - so its not possible say what is causing it. On top of this Delphi 2007 now requires being launced as an administrator to launcg a debugging process for the app. Question 1 : How can I see what is causing this besides starting from scratch in a new exe - IOW is there a log somewhere I can check Question 2 : Will using a signed exe using authenticode still cause the UAC alert to show

    Read the article

  • Silverlight Cream for April 29, 2010 -- #851

    - by Dave Campbell
    In this Issue: Carlos Figueira(-2-), Subodh Pushpak, Gergely Orosz, John Papa, Mike Snow(-2-), Rishi, Tim Heuer, Stefan Olson, and David Anson. Shoutouts: Josh Holmes blogged about a cool app the City of Miami has up: Miami 311: Built on Windows Azure Gergely Orosz reports on the state of a bug he found pre SL4: Silverlight 4 still displays large elements incorrectly Laura Foy and Charlie Kindel discuss WP7 on Channel 9: Windows Phone 7 Developer Tools Refresh Announced Charlie Kindel has an announcement, good instructions, and what's new notes on the Windows Phone Developer Tools CTP Refresh! Tim Heuer mentioned the workaround for this in his post (below), but I thought you might like to read Brandon Watson's debrief of what it's all about: Signed Assemblies Bug in the Windows Phone Tools CTP Refresh Laurent Bugnion posted about interrelations between versions of Blend and WP7 code... read it closely: Be careful when installing the Blend Windows Phone 7 Add-In From SilverlightCream.com: Consuming REST/POX services in Silverlight 4 Carlos Figueira has a pair of posts up about consuming services in Silverlight 4. This first one is about consuming REST/POX services. He provides a Service Contract that can be used with either and the full project code is available as well. Consuming REST/JSON services in Silverlight 4 In the second post, Carlos Figueira provides the code to allow WCF and Silverlight 4 to consume strongly-typed REST/JSON... and again, all the code is available. Silverlight and WCF caching Subodh Pushpak has a post up discussing caching in WCF, and has code demonstrating turning caching on at run-time. Detecting Silverlight Version Installed Gergely Orosz said it right when he said "Detecting the Silverlight version installed on a client machine isn’t entirely straightforward." ... and after reading this post, if you take the link to his ScottLogic blog, you'll get a full break-out of how it's done. Silverlight TV 22: Tim Heuer on Extending the SMF It's Thursday, and that means Silverlight TV! ... this week, John Papa has on Tim Heuer who has always been out there pushing media... and he's talking about SMF or Silverlight Media Framework for the uninitiated, and also extending it. Silverlight Tip of the Day #7 – Localized Resources Mike Snow has Tip Number 7 up and it's about localization... good end-to-end discussion and demonstration. Just thought I should use that to prove to my daughter that the tatoo she had put on the back of her neck actually reads "Eat More Broccoli" :) Silverlight Tip of the Day #8 – Detecting Alt, Shift, Control, Window & Apple Keys Combinations I just realized Mike Snow's site logo reads "Silverlight Tips of the Day" (bolding mine) ... that answers why I'm seeing more than one -- sorry Mike, couldn't pass it up :) ... Mike's second tip today and number 8 in the series is on detecting all the mouse button and ctl/alt/shift combinations in Silverlight. nRoute: More Wholesomeness, with SL 4 and .NET 4.0 Rishi has a post up announcing a new nRoute release for Silverlight 4 and .NET 4.0 He's tweaked the code to take advantages of enhancements in the new platforms, so check it out. Windows Phone 7 Developer Tools April 2010 Refresh Booya... Tim Heuer announced the release of the next drop in the WP7 tools ... dang wish I was at home today :) ... be sure to read the post for info such as the notes about Authenticode Assemblies and the release notes. Updates to Silverlight Multi-binding support Stefan Olson points up a SL4 change to Multi-binding support that he had previously blogged about. He shows the previous non-working example, and what you have to do to make it work now. Using XAML to create a custom wallpaper image for your mobile device David Anson has a solution for those pesky lost devices, and let me go on the record right now saying if anyone finds a WP7 phone laying around, just call me, it's mine :) [think that'd work??] ... ok, David's solution is a WPF app "MobileDeviceHomeScreenMaker" that you get the info set and it produces a png you then put on your device. But seriously about that lost phone... Stay in the 'Light! Twitter SilverlightNews | Twitter WynApse | WynApse.com | Tagged Posts | SilverlightCream Join me @ SilverlightCream | Phoenix Silverlight User Group Technorati Tags: Silverlight    Silverlight 3    Silverlight 4    Windows Phone MIX10

    Read the article

  • how many types of code signing certificates do I need?

    - by gerryLowry
    in Canada, website SSL certificates can be had for as low as US$10. unfortunately, code signing certificates cost about 10 time as much, one website mentions Vista compatibility ... this seems strange because my assumption is they must support XP, Vista, Windows 7, Server 2003, and Server 2008 or they would be useless. https://secure.ksoftware.net/code_signing.html US$99 Support Platforms Microsoft Authenticode. Sign any Microsoft executable format (32 and 64 bit EXE, DLL, OCX, DLL or any Active X control). Signing hardware drivers is not currently supported. Abode AIR. Sign any Adobe AIR application. Java. Sign any JAR applet Microsoft Office. Sign any MS Office Macro or VBA (Visual Basic for Applications) file. Mozilla. Sign any Mozilla Object file. The implication is that a single code signing certificate can do ALL of the above. ksoftware actually discounts Commodo certificates and the Commode website is unclear. QUESTION: Will ONE code signing certificate be enough or do I need one for Microsoft executables, and a second for things like Word and Excel macros? my main goal is to sign things like vs2008 code snippets so that I can export them securely; however, I would like to be able to use the same code signing certificate for signing other items too. Thank you ~~ regards, Gerry (Lowry)

    Read the article

  • SSL certificates and types for securing your websites and applications

    - by Mit Naik
    Need to share few information regarding SSL certificates and there types, which SSL certificates are widely used etc. There are several SSL certificates available in the market today inorder to secure your domains, multiple subdomains, your applications and code too. Few of the details are mentioned below. CheapSSL certificates available today are Standard Rapidssl certificate, Thwate SSL 123 etc certificates which are basic level certificates. Most of these cheap SSL certificates are domain-validated only and don't provide the greatest trust for your customers. This means you shouldn't use cheap SSL certificates on e-commerce stores or other public-facing sites that require people to trust the site. EV certificates I found Geotrust Truebusinessid with EV certificate which is one of the cheapest certificate available in market today, you can also find Thwate, Versign EV version of certificates. Its designed to prevent phishing attacks better than normal SSL certificates. What makes an EV Certificate so special? An SSL Certificate Provider has to do some extensive validation to give you one including: Verifying that your organization is legally registered and active, Verifying the address and phone number of your organization, Verifying that your organization has exclusive right to use the domain specified in the EV Certificate, Verifying that the person ordering the certificate has been authorized by the organization, Verifying that your organization is not on any government blacklists. SSL WILDCARD CERTIFICATES, SSL Wildcard Certificates are big money-savers. An SSL Wildcard Certificate allows you to secure an unlimited number of first-level sub-domains on a single domain name. For example, if you need to secure the following websites: * www.yourdomain.com * secure.yourdomain.com * product.yourdomain.com * info.yourdomain.com * download.yourdomain.com * anything.yourdomain.com and all of these websites are hosted on the multiple server box, you can purchase and install one Wildcard certificate issued to *.yourdomain.com to secure all these sites. SAN CERTIFICATES, are interesting certificates and are helpfull if you want to secure multiple domains by generating single CSR and can install the same certificate on your additional sites without generating new CSRs for all the additional domains. CODE SIGNING CERTIFICATES, A code signing certificate is a file containing a digital signature that can be used to sign executables and scripts in order to verify your identity and ensure that your code has not been tampered with since it was signed. This helps your users to determine whether your software can be trusted. Scroll to the chart below to compare cheap code signing certificates. A code signing certificate allows you to sign code using a private and public key system similar to how an SSL certificate secures a website. When you request a code signing certificate, a public/private key pair is generated. The certificate authority will then issue a code signing certificate that contains the public key. A certificate for code signing needs to be signed by a trusted certificate authority so that the operating system knows that your identity has been validated. You could still use the code signing certificate to sign and distribute malicious software but you will be held legally accountable for it. You can sign many different types of code. The most common types include Windows applications such as .exe, .cab, .dll, .ocx, and .xpi files (using an Authenticode certificate), Apple applications (using an Apple code signing certificate), Microsoft Office VBA objects and macros (using a VBA code signing certificate), .jar files (using a Java code signing certificate), .air or .airi files (using an Adobe AIR certificate), and Windows Vista drivers and other kernel-mode software (using a Vista code certificate). In reality, a code signing certificate can sign almost all types of code as long as you convert the certificate to the correct format first. Also I found the below URL which provides you good suggestion regarding purchasing best SSL certificates for securing your site, as per the Financial institution, Bank, Hosting providers, ISP, Retail Merchants etc. Please vote and provide comments or any additional suggestions regarding SSL certificates.

    Read the article

  • Windows Azure Root CAs and SSL Client Certificates

    - by Your DisplayName here!
    I ran into some problems while trying to make SSL client certificates work for StarterSTS 1.5. In theory you have to do two things (via startup tasks): Unlock the SSL section in IIS Install all the root certificates for the client certs you want to accept I did that. But it still does not work. While inspecting the event log, I stumbled over an schannel error message that I’ve never seen before: “When asking for client authentication, this server sends a list of trusted certificate authorities to the client. The client uses this list to choose a client certificate that is trusted by the server. Currently, this server trusts so many certificate authorities that the list has grown too long. This list has thus been truncated. The administrator of this machine should review the certificate authorities trusted for client authentication and remove those that do not really need to be trusted.” WTF? And indeed standard Azure (web role) VMs trust 275 root CAs (see attached list). Including kinda obscure ones. I don’t really know why MS made this design decision. It seems just wrong (including breaking the SSL client cert functionality). Deleting like 60% of them made SSL client certs from my CA work. So I guess I now have to find an automated way to attach CTLs to my site…joy. Exported list of trusted CA (as of 30th Dec 2010) AC Raíz Certicámara S.A. (4/2/2030 9:42:02 PM) AC RAIZ FNMT-RCM (1/1/2030 12:00:00 AM) A-CERT ADVANCED (10/23/2011 2:14:14 PM) Actalis Authentication CA G1 (6/25/2022 2:06:00 PM) Agence Nationale de Certification Electronique (8/12/2037 9:03:17 AM) Agence Nationale de Certification Electronique (8/12/2037 9:58:14 AM) Agencia Catalana de Certificacio (NIF Q-0801176-I) (1/7/2031 10:59:59 PM) America Online Root Certification Authority 1 (11/19/2037 8:43:00 PM) America Online Root Certification Authority 2 (9/29/2037 2:08:00 PM) ANCERT Certificados CGN (2/11/2024 5:27:12 PM) ANCERT Certificados Notariales (2/11/2024 3:58:26 PM) ANCERT Corporaciones de Derecho Publico (2/11/2024 5:22:45 PM) A-Trust-nQual-01 (11/30/2014 11:00:00 PM) A-Trust-nQual-03 (8/17/2015 10:00:00 PM) A-Trust-Qual-01 (11/30/2014 11:00:00 PM) A-Trust-Qual-02 (12/2/2014 11:00:00 PM) A-Trust-Qual-03a (4/24/2018 10:00:00 PM) Austria Telekom-Control Kommission (9/24/2005 12:40:00 PM) Austrian Society for Data Protection (2/12/2009 11:30:30 AM) Austrian Society for Data Protection GLOBALTRUST Certification Service (9/18/2036 2:12:35 PM) Autoridad Certificadora Raiz de la Secretaria de Economia (5/9/2025 12:00:00 AM) Autoridad de Certificacion de la Abogacia (6/13/2030 10:00:00 PM) Autoridad de Certificacion Firmaprofesional CIF A62634068 (10/24/2013 10:00:00 PM) Autoridade Certificadora Raiz Brasileira (11/30/2011 11:59:00 PM) Baltimore CyberTrust Root (5/12/2025 11:59:00 PM) BIT AdminCA-CD-T01 (1/25/2016 12:36:19 PM) BIT Admin-Root-CA (11/10/2021 7:51:07 AM) Buypass Class 2 CA 1 (10/13/2016 10:25:09 AM) Buypass Class 3 CA 1 (5/9/2015 2:13:03 PM) CA Disig (3/22/2016 1:39:34 AM) CertEurope (3/27/2037 11:00:00 PM) CERTICAMARA S.A. (2/23/2015 5:10:37 PM) Certicámara S.A. (5/23/2011 10:00:00 PM) Certigna (6/29/2027 3:13:05 PM) Certipost E-Trust Primary Normalised CA (7/26/2020 10:00:00 AM) Certipost E-Trust Primary Qualified CA (7/26/2020 10:00:00 AM) Certipost E-Trust Primary TOP Root CA (7/26/2025 10:00:00 AM) Certisign Autoridade Certificadora AC1S (6/27/2018 12:00:00 AM) Certisign Autoridade Certificadora AC2 (6/27/2018 12:00:00 AM) Certisign Autoridade Certificadora AC3S (7/9/2018 8:56:32 PM) Certisign Autoridade Certificadora AC4 (6/27/2018 12:00:00 AM) CertPlus Class 1 Primary CA (7/6/2020 11:59:59 PM) CertPlus Class 2 Primary CA (7/6/2019 11:59:59 PM) CertPlus Class 3 Primary CA (7/6/2019 11:59:59 PM) CertPlus Class 3P Primary CA (7/6/2019 11:59:59 PM) CertPlus Class 3TS Primary CA (7/6/2019 11:59:59 PM) CertRSA01 (3/3/2010 2:59:59 PM) certSIGN Root CA (7/4/2031 5:20:04 PM) Certum (6/11/2027 10:46:39 AM) Certum Trusted Network CA (12/31/2029 12:07:37 PM) Chambers of Commerce Root - 2008 (7/31/2038 12:29:50 PM) Chambersign Chambers of Commerce Root (9/30/2037 4:13:44 PM) Chambersign Global Root (9/30/2037 4:14:18 PM) Chambersign Public Notary Root (9/30/2037 4:14:49 PM) Chunghwa Telecom Co. Ltd. (12/20/2034 2:31:27 AM) Cisco Systems (5/14/2029 8:25:42 PM) CNNIC Root (4/16/2027 7:09:14 AM) Common Policy (10/15/2027 4:08:00 PM) COMODO (12/31/2028 11:59:59 PM) COMODO (1/18/2038 11:59:59 PM) COMODO (12/31/2029 11:59:59 PM) ComSign Advanced Security CA (3/24/2029 9:55:55 PM) ComSign CA (3/19/2029 3:02:18 PM) ComSign Secured CA (3/16/2029 3:04:56 PM) Correo Uruguayo - Root CA (12/31/2030 2:59:59 AM) Cybertrust Global Root (12/15/2021 8:00:00 AM) DanID (2/11/2037 9:09:30 AM) DanID (4/5/2021 5:03:17 PM) Deutsche Telekom Root CA 2 (7/9/2019 11:59:00 PM) DigiCert (11/10/2031 12:00:00 AM) DigiCert (11/10/2031 12:00:00 AM) DigiCert (11/10/2031 12:00:00 AM) DigiNotar Root CA (3/31/2025 6:19:21 PM) DIRECCION GENERAL DE LA POLICIA (2/8/2036 10:59:59 PM) DST (ABA.ECOM) CA (7/9/2009 5:33:53 PM) DST (ANX Network) CA (12/9/2018 4:16:48 PM) DST (Baltimore EZ) CA (7/3/2009 7:56:53 PM) DST (National Retail Federation) RootCA (12/8/2008 4:14:16 PM) DST (United Parcel Service) RootCA (12/7/2008 12:25:46 AM) DST ACES CA X6 (11/20/2017 9:19:58 PM) DST Root CA X3 (9/30/2021 2:01:15 PM) DST RootCA X1 (11/28/2008 6:18:55 PM) DST RootCA X2 (11/27/2008 10:46:16 PM) DSTCA E1 (12/10/2018 6:40:23 PM) DSTCA E2 (12/9/2018 7:47:26 PM) DST-Entrust GTI CA (12/9/2018 12:32:24 AM) D-TRUST GmbH (5/16/2022 5:20:47 AM) D-TRUST GmbH (6/8/2012 11:47:46 AM) D-TRUST GmbH (5/16/2022 5:20:47 AM) EBG Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Saglayicisi (8/14/2016 12:31:09 AM) E-Certchile (9/5/2028 7:39:41 PM) Echoworx Root CA2 (10/7/2030 10:49:13 AM) ECRaizEstado (6/23/2030 1:41:27 PM) EDICOM (4/13/2028 4:24:22 PM) E-GÜVEN Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Saglayicisi (1/4/2017 11:32:48 AM) E-ME SSI (RCA) (5/19/2027 8:48:15 AM) Entrust (11/27/2026 8:53:42 PM) Entrust (5/25/2019 4:39:40 PM) Entrust.net (12/7/2030 5:55:54 PM) Equifax Secure eBusiness CA-1 (6/21/2020 4:00:00 AM) Equifax Secure eBusiness CA-2 (6/23/2019 12:14:45 PM) Equifax Secure Global eBusiness CA-1 (6/21/2020 4:00:00 AM) eSign Australia: eSign Imperito Primary Root CA (5/23/2012 11:59:59 PM) eSign Australia: Gatekeeper Root CA (5/23/2014 11:59:59 PM) eSign Australia: Primary Utility Root CA (5/23/2012 11:59:59 PM) Fabrica Nacional de Moneda y Timbre (3/18/2019 3:26:19 PM) GeoTrust (8/22/2018 4:41:51 PM) GeoTrust (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) GeoTrust Global CA (5/21/2022 4:00:00 AM) GeoTrust Global CA 2 (3/4/2019 5:00:00 AM) GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G2 (1/18/2038 11:59:59 PM) GeoTrust Primary Certification Authority - G3 (12/1/2037 11:59:59 PM) GeoTrust Universal CA (3/4/2029 5:00:00 AM) GeoTrust Universal CA 2 (3/4/2029 5:00:00 AM) Global Chambersign Root - 2008 (7/31/2038 12:31:40 PM) GlobalSign (1/28/2028 12:00:00 PM) GlobalSign (12/15/2021 8:00:00 AM) Go Daddy Class 2 Certification Authority (6/29/2034 5:06:20 PM) GTE CyberTrust Global Root (8/13/2018 11:59:00 PM) GTE CyberTrust Root (4/3/2004 11:59:00 PM) GTE CyberTrust Root (2/23/2006 11:59:00 PM) Halcom CA FO (6/5/2020 10:33:31 AM) Halcom CA PO 2 (2/7/2019 6:33:31 PM) Hongkong Post Root CA (1/16/2010 11:59:00 PM) Hongkong Post Root CA 1 (5/15/2023 4:52:29 AM) I.CA První certifikacní autorita a.s. (4/1/2018 12:00:00 AM) I.CA První certifikacní autorita a.s. (4/1/2018 12:00:00 AM) InfoNotary (3/6/2026 5:33:05 PM) IPS SERVIDORES (12/29/2009 11:21:07 PM) IZENPE S.A. (1/30/2018 11:00:00 PM) Izenpe.com (12/13/2037 8:27:25 AM) Japan Certification Services, Inc. SecureSign RootCA1 (9/15/2020 2:59:59 PM) Japan Certification Services, Inc. SecureSign RootCA11 (4/8/2029 4:56:47 AM) Japan Certification Services, Inc. SecureSign RootCA2 (9/15/2020 2:59:59 PM) Japan Certification Services, Inc. SecureSign RootCA3 (9/15/2020 2:59:59 PM) Japan Local Government PKI Application CA (3/31/2016 2:59:59 PM) Japanese Government ApplicationCA (12/12/2017 3:00:00 PM) Juur-SK AS Sertifitseerimiskeskus (8/26/2016 2:23:01 PM) KamuSM (8/21/2017 11:37:07 AM) KISA RootCA 1 (8/24/2025 8:05:46 AM) KISA RootCA 3 (11/19/2014 6:39:51 AM) Macao Post eSignTrust (1/29/2013 11:59:59 PM) MicroSec e-Szigno Root CA (4/6/2017 12:28:44 PM) Microsoft Authenticode(tm) Root (12/31/1999 11:59:59 PM) Microsoft Root Authority (12/31/2020 7:00:00 AM) Microsoft Root Certificate Authority (5/9/2021 11:28:13 PM) Microsoft Timestamp Root (12/30/1999 11:59:59 PM) MOGAHA Govt of Korea (4/21/2012 9:07:23 AM) MOGAHA Govt of Korea GPKI (3/15/2017 6:00:04 AM) NetLock Arany (Class Gold) Fotanúsítvány (12/6/2028 3:08:21 PM) NetLock Expressz (Class C) Tanusitvanykiado (2/20/2019 2:08:11 PM) NetLock Kozjegyzoi (Class A) Tanusitvanykiado (2/19/2019 11:14:47 PM) NetLock Minositett Kozjegyzoi (Class QA) Tanusitvanykiado (12/15/2022 1:47:11 AM) NetLock Platina (Class Platinum) Fotanúsítvány (12/6/2028 3:12:44 PM) NetLock Uzleti (Class B) Tanusitvanykiado (2/20/2019 2:10:22 PM) Netrust CA1 (3/30/2021 2:57:45 AM) Network Solutions (12/31/2029 11:59:59 PM) NLB Nova Ljubljanska Banka d.d. Ljubljana (5/15/2023 12:22:45 PM) OISTE WISeKey Global Root GA CA (12/11/2037 4:09:51 PM) Post.Trust Root CA (7/5/2022 9:12:33 AM) Post.Trust Root CA (8/20/2010 1:56:21 PM) Posta CA Root (10/20/2028 12:52:08 PM) POSTarCA (2/7/2023 11:06:58 AM) QuoVadis Root CA 2 (11/24/2031 6:23:33 PM) QuoVadis Root CA 3 (11/24/2031 7:06:44 PM) QuoVadis Root Certification Authority (3/17/2021 6:33:33 PM) Root CA Generalitat Valenciana (7/1/2021 3:22:47 PM) RSA Security 2048 V3 (2/22/2026 8:39:23 PM) SECOM Trust Systems CO LTD (6/6/2037 2:12:32 AM) SECOM Trust Systems CO LTD (6/25/2019 10:23:48 PM) SECOM Trust Systems CO LTD (9/30/2023 4:20:49 AM) Secretaria de Economia Mexico (5/8/2025 12:00:00 AM) Secrétariat Général de la Défense Nationale (10/17/2020 2:29:22 PM) SecureNet CA Class B (10/16/2009 9:59:00 AM) Serasa Certificate Authority I (11/21/2024 2:12:45 PM) Serasa Certificate Authority II (11/21/2024 12:44:48 PM) Serasa Certificate Authority III (11/21/2024 1:24:14 PM) SERVICIOS DE CERTIFICACION - A.N.C. (3/9/2009 9:08:07 PM) Sigen-CA (6/29/2021 9:57:46 PM) Sigov-CA (1/10/2021 2:22:52 PM) Skaitmeninio sertifikavimo centras (12/28/2026 12:05:04 PM) Skaitmeninio sertifikavimo centras (12/25/2026 12:08:26 PM) Skaitmeninio sertifikavimo centras (12/22/2026 12:11:30 PM) Sonera Class1 CA (4/6/2021 10:49:13 AM) Sonera Class2 CA (4/6/2021 7:29:40 AM) Spanish Property & Commerce Registry CA (4/27/2012 9:39:50 AM) Staat der Nederlanden Root CA (12/16/2015 9:15:38 AM) Staat der Nederlanden Root CA - G2 (3/25/2020 11:03:10 AM) Starfield Class 2 Certification Authority (6/29/2034 5:39:16 PM) Starfield Technologies (6/26/2019 12:19:54 AM) Starfield Technologies Inc. (12/31/2029 11:59:59 PM) StartCom Certification Authority (9/17/2036 7:46:36 PM) S-TRUST Authentication and Encryption Root CA 2005:PN (6/21/2030 11:59:59 PM) Swisscom Root CA 1 (8/18/2025 10:06:20 PM) SwissSign (10/25/2036 8:30:35 AM) SwissSign Platinum G2 Root CA (10/25/2036 8:36:00 AM) SwissSign Silver G2 Root CA (10/25/2036 8:32:46 AM) TC TrustCenter Class 1 CA (1/1/2011 11:59:59 AM) TC TrustCenter Class 2 CA (1/1/2011 11:59:59 AM) TC TrustCenter Class 2 CA II (12/31/2025 10:59:59 PM) TC TrustCenter Class 3 CA (1/1/2011 11:59:59 AM) TC TrustCenter Class 3 CA II (12/31/2025 10:59:59 PM) TC TrustCenter Class 4 CA (1/1/2011 11:59:59 AM) TC TrustCenter Class 4 CA II (12/31/2025 10:59:59 PM) TC TrustCenter Time Stamping CA (1/1/2011 11:59:59 AM) TC TrustCenter Universal CA I (12/31/2025 10:59:59 PM) TC TrustCenter Universal CA II (12/31/2030 10:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) thawte Primary Root CA - G2 (1/18/2038 11:59:59 PM) thawte Primary Root CA - G3 (12/1/2037 11:59:59 PM) Thawte Timestamping CA (12/31/2020 11:59:59 PM) Trustis EVS Root CA (1/9/2027 11:56:00 AM) Trustis FPS Root CA (1/21/2024 11:36:54 AM) Trustwave (1/1/2035 5:37:19 AM) Trustwave (12/31/2029 7:40:55 PM) Trustwave (12/31/2029 7:52:06 PM) TURKTRUST Elektronik Islem Hizmetleri (9/16/2015 12:13:05 PM) TURKTRUST Elektronik Islem Hizmetleri (3/22/2015 10:04:51 AM) TURKTRUST Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Saglayicisi (9/16/2015 10:07:57 AM) TURKTRUST Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Saglayicisi (3/22/2015 10:27:17 AM) TÜRKTRUST Elektronik Sertifika Hizmet Saglayicisi (12/22/2017 6:37:19 PM) TW Government Root Certification Authority (12/5/2032 1:23:33 PM) TWCA Root Certification Authority 1 (12/31/2030 3:59:59 PM) TWCA Root Certification Authority 2 (12/31/2030 3:59:59 PM) U.S. Government FBCA (10/6/2010 6:53:56 PM) UCA Global Root (12/31/2037 12:00:00 AM) UCA Root (12/31/2029 12:00:00 AM) USERTrust (7/9/2019 6:40:36 PM) USERTrust (7/9/2019 5:36:58 PM) USERTrust (6/24/2019 7:06:30 PM) USERTrust (7/9/2019 6:19:22 PM) USERTrust (5/30/2020 10:48:38 AM) UTN - USERFirst-Network Applications (7/9/2019 6:57:49 PM) ValiCert Class 3 Policy Validation Authority (6/26/2019 12:22:33 AM) VAS Latvijas Pasts SSI(RCA) (9/13/2024 9:27:57 AM) VeriSign (5/18/2018 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (12/31/1999 9:37:48 AM) VeriSign (1/7/2004 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (5/18/2018 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (1/7/2004 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (1/7/2020 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (12/31/1999 9:35:58 AM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (1/7/2004 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (1/7/2010 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (5/18/2018 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (1/7/2004 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (7/16/2036 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign (5/18/2018 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary CA (8/1/2028 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign Class 3 Public Primary Certification Authority - G4 (1/18/2038 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign Time Stamping CA (1/7/2004 11:59:59 PM) VeriSign Universal Root Certification Authority (12/1/2037 11:59:59 PM) Visa eCommerce Root (6/24/2022 12:16:12 AM) Visa Information Delivery Root CA (6/29/2025 5:42:42 PM) VRK Gov. Root CA (12/18/2023 1:51:08 PM) Wells Fargo Root Certificate Authority (1/14/2021 4:41:28 PM) WellsSecure Public Certificate Authority (12/14/2022 12:07:54 AM) Xcert EZ by DST (7/11/2009 4:14:18 PM)

    Read the article

  • CodePlex Daily Summary for Tuesday, April 13, 2010

    CodePlex Daily Summary for Tuesday, April 13, 2010New ProjectsChat Neo: Video chatDev-wow HappyFuwa: Silverlight + Asp.net + Ajax 实现的以北京奥运为题材,福娃在线聊天互动系统 登录系统后,你可以和线上的朋友即时互动,走动 聊天 动作等都会呈现给其他的在线用户Dynamic Configuration Manager: Dynamic Configuration Manager GameHelper: the project of myselfGeotron: Geotron is a C# geolocation library to resolve postcodes and addresses to co-ordinates, to assist developers in creating location-aware applications. InfoPath Forms Services 2010 Web Testing Toolkit: This project has the tools and information needed to write Visual Studio web tests for InfoPath Forms Services 2010.IronBrainFuck, SimpleBrainFuck: IronBrainFuck and SimpleBrainFuck makes it easier for BrainFuck programmers to develop BrainFuck-compatible programs. It's developed in C#.Runtime Intelligence API: The Runtime Intelligence API library and samples provided by PreEmptive Solutions.SilverVNC 1.0: This project is a Silverlight VNC Viewer. It requires Silverlight 4.0 and works in Out of Browser with full-trust.Snippet Creator: Yet another Visual Studio plugin for creating code snippets.Software Codex: Software Codex is a collection of projects developed in .net to provide a set of libraries and functionalities for developers. It is divided into m...TestCrm: Let go!Make our CrmVidCoder: VidCoder is a DVD ripping and video transcoding application. It uses HandBrake for the encoding engine, but has a revamped and easy to use UI writt...WPF Data Virtualization: Component for displaying and interacting a large data set in WPF application.WPF Gantt chart: Gantt chart control for WPFNew ReleasesAJAX Control Toolkit: 40412: AJAX Control Toolkit Release Notes - April 12th 2010 Release Version 40412April 12, 2010 release of the AJAX Control Toolkit. AJAX Control Toolkit...ASP.NET MVC | SCAFFOLD: ASP.NET MVC SCAFFOLD 1.0 PREVIEW: Primeiro release do ASP.NET MVC SCAFFOLD.Autenticar no OpenLDAP utilizando pGIna: LDAPAuth plugin: Release: DLL LDAPAuth Brief: pGina pluginBluetooth Radar: Version 1.8: Add position helper class to test whether a given point is on the interior of a circle. Random set of Devices on the radar + Zindex changes on Mous...Database Searcher: DB-Searcher Binaries v0.1: First beta version containing following features: Search exact database values via .NET DB-Provider Microsoft SQL MySQL .NET Connector (no .NET t...DBSourceTools: DBSourceTools_1.2.0.7: Release 1.2.0.7 Extended search engine from (pegas)'s patch. Fixed Script Data bug with reserved word (eripsni). Write Targets can now create targe...ESB Toolkit Extensions: Tellago SOA ESB Extenstions v0.4: Windows Installer file that installs Library on a BizTalk ESB 2.0 system. This Install automatically configures the esb.config to use the new compo...Fluent Assertions: Release 1.2: See this blog post for more details on this release: http://www.dennisdoomen.net/2010/04/fluent-assertions-12-has-been-released.htmlFNA Fractal Numerical Algorithm for a new encryption technology: FNA: This is a latest distribution ( 0.04 at the moment). Is a Perl package (.pm). More information on: http://search.cpan.org/~anak/Free Silverlight & WPF Chart Control - Visifire: Visifire SL and WPF Charts 3.0.6 Released!: Hi, Today we have released the final version of Visifire v3.0.6 which contains the following major features: * Zoom using interactive ZoomRec...HD-Trailers.NET Downloader: HD-Trailers.NET_Downloader_v.91_BETA: - added configuration option 'FeedAddress' to specify the URL of the RSS feed to consume - implemented fix for workitem4260: AddDate = false; will ...HobbyBrew Mobile: Beta 1: First public BetaHome Access Plus+: v3.2.6.1: v3.2.6.1 Fixed the wrong date in the iCal Generator Fixed the admin booking posting logging it as being booked by the admin Fixed the problem o...HTML Ruby: 6.21.1: Added back the space ruby text option More consistent ruby text positioning regardless to the page's stylesInfoPath Forms Services 2010 Web Testing Toolkit: IPFS 2010 Web Test Toolkit 20100412 for VS2008: The ExtractAndSubstituteDynamicInfoPathData web test plugin. To use it, simply add the plugin to your web test. It automatically recognizes the inf...IronPython: 2.6.1: Hello Python Community, We’re pleased to announce the final release of IronPython 2.6.1. This version of IronPython makes great strides in stabili...IronRuby: 1.0: IronRuby 1.0 is the first stable version of IronRuby, targeting Ruby 1.8.6 compatibility. For a high-level compatibility report solely based on Rub...METAR.NET Decoder: 0.3.x beta: First public release. Main of the application is working. Metar can be downloaded, decoded, updated and encoded back to metar string. Release incl...MiniTwitter: 1.11: MiniTwitter 1.11 更新内容 修正 設定ファイルを自動でバックアップして、破損したときは出来るだけ修正するように。 初回起動時にタイムラインを更新しようとすると落ちるバグを修正。MSBuild Mercurial Tasks: 1.0.1 Stable: Ready for Production release. This version integrates all the basic functionalities of Mercurial as defined in the Use Case 1.Multiplayer Quiz: Release 1_7_0_0: Latest Version Strongly recommended to use .NET 4.0 now that it is in RC It can be downloaded from hereMVC Foolproof Validation: Beta 0.9.3754: First Beta release. Addressed several bugs from alpha along with some considerable class refactoring. ModelAwareValidationAttribute will make creat...NodeXL: Network Overview, Discovery and Exploration for Excel: NodeXL Excel 2007 Template, version 1.0.1.121: The NodeXL Excel 2007 template displays a network graph using edge and vertex lists stored in an Excel 2007 workbook. What's NewThis version allow...Proxi [Proxy Interface]: Proxi Release 1.0.0.412: Proxi Release 1.0.0.412QueryUnit: QueryUnitPOC v. 0.0.0.8: This version add support for AreNotEqual, Greater, Less and fix some problems with "format" attribute used in conjunction with the string data type...Rainier: Trabalhos de orçamento empresarial: Estão disponíveis os arquivos de exemplo sobre o planejamento para orçamento empresarial. A resolução é referente aos exercícios explicados em sal...Runtime Intelligence API: Initial release: The initial release of the WCF contract & proxy assembly. AuthentiCode signed library.SharePoint Accelerators: Central Admin - Command Search: This web part allows you to search for a SharePoint 2010 Central Admin commands. This web part can come handy when you are demostrating SharePoint ...SharePoint Labs: SPLab5013A-FRA-Level100: SPLab5013A-FRA-Level100* This SharePoint Lab will teach you how to provision a computed site column that shows a customized view of an existing hid...SilverVNC 1.0: SilverVNC 1.0.3755.0: This download is the first release of the project published on www.silverlightplayground.org. For a detailed explanation please refer to http://www...Snippet Creator: SnippetCreator.Setup: This is the first and (I hope) final release.SQL Server Health & History (SQLH2): SQLH2 v.2.2.001: New Features Updated to use .Net 3.5 Job and Job history information implemented Last dif and log backup columns added Logical Disk implemented Dis...SQL Server Health & History (SQLH2): SQLH2PerfCollector v.2.1.003: Updated to run on .Net 3.5 Now installs to correct registry path on x64Star Trooper for XNA 2D Tutorial: Lesson one content: Here is Lesson one original content for the StarTrooper 2D XNA tutorial. The blog tutorial has now started over on http://xna-uk.net/blogs/darkgen...SysPad: SysPad 4.10.7.1: A folder management and scratchpad utility; especially useful in a business network setting that utilizes numerous, commonly used folders. The pro...TaskUnZip for SSIS: TaskUnZip for SSIS 1.1.0.0: Add: recursive compress. Add: filter option for exstract e compress file. (Tnx to: Kevin Wendler)TCP Wrapper: TCP Wrapper 1.0.0.3: Adding Client Accessor to CommingDataAvailableEventArgs ...UCD: Architecture: UCDArch 1.0: Production release of UCDArch 1.0 (for ASP.NET MVC 1.0). New Features including the ability to modify the NHibernate FlushMode, URL convention help...VCC: Latest build, v2.1.30412.0: Automatic drop of latest buildVidCoder: 0.1.0: First VidCoder beta release. It's missing a few features that will be added before release: Advanced x264 options In-GUI encode log Additiona...WatchersNET CKEditor™ Provider for DotNetNuke: CKEditor Provider 1.10.01: Whats New changesBrowser: Removed extra "\" sign from Current folder name selecting the root folder Browser: Fixed Folder Rendering Browser Fix...WPF Gantt chart: gantt: first, alpha version, of gantt chart for wpfxvanneste: Coverflow et thumbnail sharepoint: Code du coverflow silverlight du webcast sur les thumbnails sharepointMost Popular ProjectsWBFS ManagerRawrMicrosoft SQL Server Product Samples: DatabaseAJAX Control ToolkitSilverlight ToolkitWindows Presentation Foundation (WPF)ASP.NETMicrosoft SQL Server Community & SamplesFacebook Developer ToolkitPHPExcelMost Active ProjectsRawrnopCommerce. Open Source online shop e-commerce solution.AutoPocopatterns & practices – Enterprise LibraryShweet: SharePoint 2010 Team Messaging built with PexFarseer Physics EngineNB_Store - Free DotNetNuke Ecommerce Catalog ModuleIonics Isapi Rewrite FilterBlogEngine.NETBeanProxy

    Read the article

  • The Windows Store... why did I sign up with this mess again?

    - by FransBouma
    Yesterday, Microsoft revealed that the Windows Store is now open to all developers in a wide range of countries and locations. For the people who think "wtf is the 'Windows Store'?", it's the central place where Windows 8 users will be able to find, download and purchase applications (or as we now have to say to not look like a computer illiterate: <accent style="Kentucky">aaaaappss</accent>) for Windows 8. As this is the store which is integrated into Windows 8, it's an interesting place for ISVs, as potential customers might very well look there first. This of course isn't true for all kinds of software, and developer tools in general aren't the kind of applications most users will download from the Windows store, but a presence there can't hurt. Now, this Windows Store hosts two kinds of applications: 'Metro-style' applications and 'Desktop' applications. The 'Metro-style' applications are applications created for the new 'Metro' UI which is present on Windows 8 desktop and Windows RT (the single color/big font fingerpaint-oriented UI). 'Desktop' applications are the applications we all run and use on Windows today. Our software are desktop applications. The Windows Store hosts all Metro-style applications locally in the store and handles the payment for these applications. This means you upload your application (sorry, 'app') to the store, jump through a lot of hoops, Microsoft verifies that your application is not violating a tremendous long list of rules and after everything is OK, it's published and hopefully you get customers and thus earn money. Money which Microsoft will pay you on a regular basis after customers buy your application. Desktop applications are not following this path however. Desktop applications aren't hosted by the Windows Store. Instead, the Windows Store more or less hosts a page with the application's information and where to get the goods. I.o.w.: it's nothing more than a product's Facebook page. Microsoft will simply redirect a visitor of the Windows Store to your website and the visitor will then use your site's system to purchase and download the application. This last bit of information is very important. So, this morning I started with fresh energy to register our company 'Solutions Design bv' at the Windows Store and our two applications, LLBLGen Pro and ORM Profiler. First I went to the Windows Store dashboard page. If you don't have an account, you have to log in or sign up if you don't have a live account. I signed in with my live account. After that, it greeted me with a page where I had to fill in a code which was mailed to me. My local mail server polls every several minutes for email so I had to kick it to get it immediately. I grabbed the code from the email and I was presented with a multi-step process to register myself as a company or as an individual. In red I was warned that this choice was permanent and not changeable. I chuckled: Microsoft apparently stores its data on paper, not in digital form. I chose 'company' and was presented with a lengthy form to fill out. On the form there were two strange remarks: Per company there can just be 1 (one, uno, not zero, not two or more) registered developer, and only that developer is able to upload stuff to the store. I have no idea how this works with large companies, oh the overhead nightmares... "Sorry, but John, our registered developer with the Windows Store is on holiday for 3 months, backpacking through Australia, no, he's not reachable at this point. M'yeah, sorry bud. Hey, did you fill in those TPS reports yesterday?" A separate Approver has to be specified, which has to be a different person than the registered developer. Apparently to Microsoft a company with just 1 person is not a company. Luckily we're with two people! *pfew*, dodged that one, otherwise I would be stuck forever: the choice I already made was not reversible! After I had filled out the form and it was all well and good and accepted by the Microsoft lackey who had to write it all down in some paper notebook ("Hey, be warned! It's a permanent choice! Written down in ink, can't be changed!"), I was presented with the question how I wanted to pay for all this. "Pay for what?" I wondered. Must be the paper they were scribbling the information on, I concluded. After all, there's a financial crisis going on! How could I forget! Silly me. "Ok fair enough". The price was 75 Euros, not the end of the world. I could only pay by credit card, so it was accepted quickly. Or so I thought. You see, Microsoft has a different idea about CC payments. In the normal world, you type in your CC number, some date, a name and a security code and that's it. But Microsoft wants to verify this even more. They want to make a verification purchase of a very small amount and are doing that with a special code in the description. You then have to type in that code in a special form in the Windows Store dashboard and after that you're verified. Of course they'll refund the small amount they pull from your card. Sounds simple, right? Well... no. The problem starts with the fact that I can't see the CC activity on some website: I have a bank issued CC card. I get the CC activity once a month on a piece of paper sent to me. The bank's online website doesn't show them. So it's possible I have to wait for this code till October 12th. One month. "So what, I'm not going to use it anyway, Desktop applications don't use the payment system", I thought. "Haha, you're so naive, dear developer!" Microsoft won't allow you to publish any applications till this verification is done. So no application publishing for a month. Wouldn't it be nice if things were, you know, digital, so things got done instantly? But of course, that lackey who scribbled everything in the Big Windows Store Registration Book isn't that quick. Can't blame him though. He's just doing his job. Now, after the payment was done, I was presented with a page which tells me Microsoft is going to use a third party company called 'Symantec', which will verify my identity again. The page explains to me that this could be done through email or phone and that they'll contact the Approver to verify my identity. "Phone?", I thought... that's a little drastic for a developer account to publish a single page of information about an external hosted software product, isn't it? On Facebook I just added a page, done. And paying you, Microsoft, took less information: you were happy to take my money before my identity was even 'verified' by this 3rd party's minions! "Double standards!", I roared. No-one cared. But it's the thought of getting it off your chest, you know. Luckily for me, everyone at Symantec was asleep when I was registering so they went for the fallback option in case phone calls were not possible: my Approver received an email. Imagine you have to explain the idiot web of security theater I was caught in to someone else who then has to reply a random person over the internet that I indeed was who I said I was. As she's a true sweetheart, she gave me the benefit of the doubt and assured that for now, I was who I said I was. Remember, this is for a desktop application, which is only a link to a website, some pictures and a piece of text. No file hosting, no payment processing, nothing, just a single page. Yeah, I also thought I was crazy. But we're not at the end of this quest yet. I clicked around in the confusing menus of the Windows Store dashboard and found the 'Desktop' section. I get a helpful screen with a warning in red that it can't find any certified 'apps'. True, I'm just getting started, buddy. I see a link: "Check the Windows apps you submitted for certification". Well, I haven't submitted anything, but let's see where it brings me. Oh the thrill of adventure! I click the link and I end up on this site: the hardware/desktop dashboard account registration. "Erm... but I just registered...", I mumbled to no-one in particular. Apparently for desktop registration / verification I have to register again, it tells me. But not only that, the desktop application has to be signed with a certificate. And not just some random el-cheapo certificate you can get at any mall's discount store. No, this certificate is special. It's precious. This certificate, the 'Microsoft Authenticode' Digital Certificate, is the only certificate that's acceptable, and jolly, it can be purchased from VeriSign for the price of only ... $99.-, but be quick, because this is a limited time offer! After that it's, I kid you not, $499.-. 500 dollars for a certificate to sign an executable. But, I do feel special, I got a special price. Only for me! I'm glowing. Not for long though. Here I started to wonder, what the benefit of it all was. I now again had to pay money for a shiny certificate which will add 'Solutions Design bv' to our installer as the publisher instead of 'unknown', while our customers download the file from our website. Not only that, but this was all about a Desktop application, which wasn't hosted by Microsoft. They only link to it. And make no mistake. These prices aren't single payments. Every year these have to be renewed. Like a membership of an exclusive club: you're special and privileged, but only if you cough up the dough. To give you an example how silly this all is: I added LLBLGen Pro and ORM Profiler to the Visual Studio Gallery some time ago. It's the same thing: it's a central place where one can find software which adds to / extends / works with Visual Studio. I could simply create the pages, add the information and they show up inside Visual Studio. No files are hosted at Microsoft, they're downloaded from our website. Exactly the same system. As I have to wait for the CC transcripts to arrive anyway, I can't proceed with publishing in this new shiny store. After the verification is complete I have to wait for verification of my software by Microsoft. Even Desktop applications need to be verified using a long list of rules which are mainly focused on Metro-style applications. Even while they're not hosted by Microsoft. I wonder what they'll find. "Your application wasn't approved. It violates rule 14 X sub D: it provides more value than our own competing framework". While I was writing this post, I tried to check something in the Windows Store Dashboard, to see whether I remembered it correctly. I was presented again with the question, after logging in with my live account, to enter the code that was just mailed to me. Not the previous code, a brand new one. Again I had to kick my mail server to pull the email to proceed. This was it. This 'experience' is so beyond miserable, I'm afraid I have to say goodbye for now to the 'Windows Store'. It's simply not worth my time. Now, about live accounts. You might know this: live accounts are tied to everything you do with Microsoft. So if you have an MSDN subscription, e.g. the one which costs over $5000.-, it's tied to this same live account. But the fun thing is, you can login with your live account to the MSDN subscriptions with just the account id and password. No additional code is mailed to you. While it gives you access to all Microsoft software available, including your licenses. Why the draconian security theater with this Windows Store, while all I want is to publish some desktop applications while on other Microsoft sites it's OK to simply sign in with your live account: no codes needed, no verification and no certificates? Microsoft, one thing you need with this store and that's: apps. Apps, apps, apps, apps, aaaaaaaaapps. Sorry, my bad, got carried away. I just can't stand the word 'app'. This store's shelves have to be filled to the brim with goods. But instead of being welcomed into the store with open arms, I have to fight an uphill battle with an endless list of rules and bullshit to earn the privilege to publish in this shiny store. As if I have to be thrilled to be one of the exclusive club called 'Windows Store Publishers'. As if Microsoft doesn't want it to succeed. Craig Stuntz sent me a link to an old blog post of his regarding code signing and uploading to Microsoft's old mobile store from back in the WinMo5 days: http://blogs.teamb.com/craigstuntz/2006/10/11/28357/. Good read and good background info about how little things changed over the years. I hope this helps Microsoft make things more clearer and smoother and also helps ISVs with their decision whether to go with the Windows Store scheme or ignore it. For now, I don't see the advantage of publishing there, especially not with the nonsense rules Microsoft cooked up. Perhaps it changes in the future, who knows.

    Read the article

1