Search Results

Search found 7 results on 1 pages for 'eed3si9n'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Apache: Isn't chmod 755 enough to set up symlink or alias on Apache httpd on Mac OS 10.5?

    - by eed3si9n
    On my Mac OS 10.5 machine, I would like to set up a subfolder of ~/Documents like ~/Documents/foo/html to be http://localhost/foo. The first thing I thought of doing is using Alias as follows: Alias /foo /Users/someone/Documents/foo/html <Directory "/Users/someone/Documents/foo/html"> Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews Order allow,deny Allow from all </Directory> This got me 403 Forbidden. In the error_log I got: [error] [client ::1] (13)Permission denied: access to /foo denied The subfolder in question has chmod 755 access. I've tried specifying likes like http://localhost/foo/test.php, but that didn't work either. Next, I tried the symlink route. Went into /Library/WebServer/Documents and made a symlink to ~/Documents/foo/html. The document root has Options Indexes FollowSymLinks MultiViews This still got me 403 Forbidden: Symbolic link not allowed or link target not accessible: /Library/WebServer/Documents/foo What else do I need to set this up? Solution: $ chmod 755 ~/Documents In general, the folder to be shared and all of its ancestor folder needs to be viewable by the www service user.

    Read the article

  • How to write Tetris in Scala? (code review)

    - by eed3si9n
    Today's the 25th birthday of Tetris. I believe writing Tetris clone is one of the best ways to familiarize oneself to a new language or a platform. It's not completely trivial and it lends itself well to learning language specific constructs like iterators and closures. I've been hearing about Scala, and finally decided to read some docs and write a Tetris clone. So, this is my first Scala code. I did try to use functional constructs, but am sure there are lots of things I can improve to do it more Scala way. Please give me suggestions using comment. Also other submissions of Tetris clone in Scala are welcome too. I'm aware that the actual question itself is somewhat subjective, but I think this is of some value since others can use this as example (or anti-example) code. Edit: Let me rephrase the question. What can I do to make the code more Scala-ish?

    Read the article

  • Delphi 2009: How do I prevent network application from leaking critical section?

    - by eed3si9n
    As part of Vista certification, Microsoft wants to make sure that an application exits without holding on to a lock (critical section): TEST CASE 31. Verify application does not break into a debugger with the specified AppVerifier checks (Req:3.2) As it turns out, network applications built using Delphi 2009 does break into the debugger, which displays unhelpful message as follows: (1214.1f10): Break instruction exception - code 80000003 (first chance) eax=00000001 ebx=07b64ff8 ecx=a6450000 edx=0007e578 esi=0017f7e0 edi=80000003 eip=77280004 esp=0017f780 ebp=0017f7ac iopl=0 nv up ei pl zr na pe nc cs=0023 ss=002b ds=002b es=002b fs=0053 gs=002b efl=00000246 *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for C:\Windows\SysWOW64\ntdll.dll - ntdll!DbgBreakPoint: 77280004 cc int 3 After hitting Go button several times, you come across the actual error: ======================================= VERIFIER STOP 00000212: pid 0x18A4: Freeing virtual memory containing an active critical section. 076CC5DC : Critical section address. 01D0191C : Critical section initialization stack trace. 075D0000 : Memory block address. 00140000 : Memory block size. ======================================= This verifier stop is continuable. After debugging it use `go' to continue. ======================================= Given that my code does not leak TCriticalSection, how do I prevent Delphi from doing so.

    Read the article

  • Scala: How to combine parser combinators from different objects

    - by eed3si9n
    Given a family of objects that implement parser combinators, how do I combine the parsers? Since Parsers.Parser is an inner class, and in Scala inner classes are bound to the outer object, the story becomes slightly complicated. Here's an example that attempts to combine two parsers from different objects. import scala.util.parsing.combinator._ class BinaryParser extends JavaTokenParsers { def anyrep: Parser[Any] = rep(any) def any: Parser[Any] = zero | one def zero: Parser[Any] = "0" def one: Parser[Any] = "1" } object LongChainParser extends BinaryParser { def parser1: Parser[Any] = zero~zero~one~one } object ShortChainParser extends BinaryParser { def parser2: Parser[Any] = zero~zero } object ExampleParser extends BinaryParser { def parser: Parser[Any] = (LongChainParser.parser1 ||| ShortChainParser.parser2) ~ anyrep def main(args: Array[String]) { println(parseAll(parser, args(0) )) } } This results to the following error: <console>:11: error: type mismatch; found : ShortChainParser.Parser[Any] required: LongChainParser.Parser[?] def parser: Parser[Any] = (LongChainParser.parser1 ||| ShortChainParser.parser2) ~ anyrep I've found the solution to this problem already, but since it was brought up recently on scala-user ML (Problem injecting one parser into another), it's probably worth putting it here too.

    Read the article

  • Scala: Can I nudge a combinator parser to be locally greedy?

    - by eed3si9n
    Suppose I have an ambiguous language expressed in combinator parser. Is there a way to make certain expressions locally greedy? Here's an example of what I mean. import scala.util.parsing.combinator._ object Example extends JavaTokenParsers { def obj: Parser[Any] = (shortchain | longchain) ~ anyrep def longchain: Parser[Any] = zero~zero~one~one def shortchain: Parser[Any] = zero~zero def anyrep: Parser[Any] = rep(any) def any: Parser[Any] = zero | one def zero: Parser[Any] = "0" def one: Parser[Any] = "1" def main(args: Array[String]) { println(parseAll(obj, args(0) )) } } After compiling, I can run it as follows: $ scala Example 001111 [1.7] parsed: ((0~0)~List(1, 1, 1, 1)) I would like to somehow instruct the first part of obj to be locally greedy and match with longchain. If I switch the order around, it matches the longchain, but that's not because of the greediness. def obj: Parser[Any] = (longchain | shortchain) ~ anyrep

    Read the article

1