Search Results

Search found 6 results on 1 pages for 'esmond'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • Corliss Expert Group Home Security: How to Secure Your Home without Spending Too Much?

    - by Mika Esmond
    HOME SECURITY: HOW TO SECURE YOUR HOME WITHOUT SPENDING TOO MUCH Imagine if there were no burglar or criminals who threaten the safety of our homes; we will be surprised how much savings we would have on several things we do to secure ourselves and our loved ones. We would not need fences, gates with locks, doors locks, window grills, CCTV cams, perimeter lighting, shotguns and baseball bats. The cost of maintaining these things can run up to the entire cost of building another room or, in some cases, a whole new house. The rationale for home security is the same for national security. A nation maintains an army whether it has enemies or not; so, whether burglars will come or not, we have to prepare for the eventuality. Hence, we end up spending for something we might never put into the actual use it was intended for. You buy a pistol and when a burglar breaks in you fire the gun either to scare or disable the intruder. We hope we will never have to use these things; but we still buy them for the peace of mind that comes from knowing we can secure or protect our family and home.

    Read the article

  • Problem with building tree bottom up

    - by Esmond
    Hi, I have problems building a binary tree from the bottom up. THe input of the tree would be internal nodes of the trees with the children of this node being the leaves of the eventual tree. So initially if the tree is empty the root would be the first internal node. Afterwards, The next internal node to be added would be the new root(NR), with the old root(OR) being one of the child of NR. And so on. The problem i have is that whenever i add a NR, the children of the OR seems to be lost when i do a inOrder traversal. This is proven to be the case when i do a getSize() call which returns the same number of nodes before and after addNode(Tree,Node) Any help with resolving this problem is appreciated edited with the inclusion of node class code. both tree and node classes have the addChild methods because i'm not very sure where to put them for it to be appropriated. any comments on this would be appreciated too. The code is as follows: import java.util.*; public class Tree { Node root; int size; public Tree() { root = null; } public Tree(Node root) { this.root = root; } public static void setChild(Node parent, Node child, double weight) throws ItemNotFoundException { if (parent.child1 != null && parent.child2 != null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node already has 2 children"); } else if (parent.child1 != null) { parent.child2 = child; child.parent = parent; parent.c2Weight = weight; } else { parent.child1 = child; child.parent = parent; parent.c1Weight = weight; } } public static void setChild1(Node parent, Node child) { parent.child1 = child; child.parent = parent; } public static void setChild2(Node parent, Node child) { parent.child2 = child; child.parent = parent; } public static Tree addNode(Tree tree, Node node) throws ItemNotFoundException { Tree tree1; if (tree.root == null) { tree.root = node; } else if (tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild1().getSeq()) || tree.root.getSeq().equals(node.getChild2().getSeq())) { Node oldRoot = tree.root; oldRoot.setParent(node); tree.root = node; } else { //form a disjoint tree and merge the 2 trees tree1 = new Tree(node); tree = mergeTree(tree, tree1); } System.out.print("addNode2 = "); if(tree.root != null ) { Tree.inOrder(tree.root); } System.out.println(); return tree; } public static Tree mergeTree(Tree tree, Tree tree1) { String root = "root"; Node node = new Node(root); tree.root.setParent(node); tree1.root.setParent(node); tree.root = node; return tree; } public static int getSize(Node root) { if (root != null) { return 1 + getSize(root.child1) + getSize(root.child2); } else { return 0; } } public static boolean isEmpty(Tree Tree) { return Tree.root == null; } public static void inOrder(Node root) { if (root != null) { inOrder(root.child1); System.out.print(root.sequence + " "); inOrder(root.child2); } } } public class Node { Node child1; Node child2; Node parent; double c1Weight; double c2Weight; String sequence; boolean isInternal; public Node(String seq) { sequence = seq; child1 = null; c1Weight = 0; child2 = null; c2Weight = 0; parent = null; isInternal = false; } public boolean hasChild() { if (this.child1 == null && this.child2 == null) { this.isInternal = false; return isInternal; } else { this.isInternal = true; return isInternal; } } public String getSeq() throws ItemNotFoundException { if (this.sequence == null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("No such node"); } else { return this.sequence; } } public void setChild(Node child, double weight) throws ItemNotFoundException { if (this.child1 != null && this.child2 != null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node already has 2 children"); } else if (this.child1 != null) { this.child2 = child; this.c2Weight = weight; } else { this.child1 = child; this.c1Weight = weight; } } public static void setChild1(Node parent, Node child) { parent.child1 = child; child.parent = parent; } public static void setChild2(Node parent, Node child) { parent.child2 = child; child.parent = parent; } public void setParent(Node parent){ this.parent = parent; } public Node getParent() throws ItemNotFoundException { if (this.parent == null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("This Node has no parent"); } else { return this.parent; } } public Node getChild1() throws ItemNotFoundException { if (this.child1 == null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("There is no child1"); } else { return this.child1; } } public Node getChild2() throws ItemNotFoundException { if (this.child2 == null) { throw new ItemNotFoundException("There is no child2"); } else { return this.child2; } } }

    Read the article

  • converting a Tree to newick format. java

    - by Esmond
    I'm having problems converting a binary rooted tree to newick format. The full explanation for such a format can be found: http://code.google.com/p/mrsrf/wiki/NewickTree An example of a newick format would be as follows: for a tree T such as http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~cs251/OldCourses/1997/topic8/images/completetreetwo.gif the newick representation would be: (((8,9),(10,11)),((12,13),(14,15))) the internal node will become the commas while the leaves will be retained. such trees have internal nodes which will always have 2 children. I have a problem using recursion to come out with this newick format. The output contains far too many nodes and braces. Any comments to resolve this problem is appreciated or even an iterative algorithm would be welcomed import java.util.Stack; public class Tree { .... public String inOrderNewick(Node root, String output) throws ItemNotFoundException { if (root.hasChild()) { output += "("; output += inOrderNewick(root.child1, output); output += ","; output += inOrderNewick(root.child2, output); output += ")"; return output; } else { output += root.getSeq(); return output; } } }

    Read the article

  • Vector ArrayIndexOutOfBounds

    - by Esmond
    I'm having an ArrayIndexOutofBounds exception with the following code. The exception is thrown at the line where Node nodeJ = vect.get(j) but it does not make sense to me since j is definitely smaller than i and Node nodeI = vect.get(i) does not throw any exception. any help is appreciated. public static Vector join(Vector vect) throws ItemNotFoundException { Vector<Node> remain = vect; for (int i = 1; i < vect.size(); i++) { Node nodeI = vect.get(i); for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {//traverse the nodes before nodeI Node nodeJ = vect.get(j); if (nodeI.getChild1().getSeq().equals(nodeJ.getSeq())) { nodeI.removeChild(nodeJ); nodeI.setChild(nodeJ); remain.remove(j); } if (nodeI.getChild2().getSeq().equals(nodeJ.getSeq())) { nodeI.removeChild(nodeJ); nodeI.setChild(nodeJ); remain.remove(j); } } } return remain; }

    Read the article

  • Data structure for unrooted trees

    - by Esmond
    I'm having problems figuring out how to build an unrooted tree with weighted edges and what data structure to store such a tree. An example of an unrooted tree would be like the one here: http://www.bio.davidson.edu/courses/GENOMICS/seq/unrooted.gif The problem i am having is the leaves would only have 1 link to the internal nodes and the internal nodes would have 3 links(the internal nodes would have 2 children and a link to another internal node). Do i have to distinguish between the 2 different kinds of nodes or can i have one class having the function of both types of nodes?

    Read the article

  • String[] initialized by null???

    - by Esmond
    Hi i encountered this problem whereby when i initialized my String[], there seems to be a null in the String[] before i do anything. How do i initialized the String[] to be completely empty,i.e. without the null at the start? The output for the following code is: nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC nullABC public static void main(String[] args){ String[] inputArr = new String[5]; for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ inputArr[i] += "ABC"; } for (int i = 0; i< inputArr.length; i++){ System.out.println(inputArr[i]); } } }

    Read the article

1