Search Results

Search found 1 results on 1 pages for 'heroxbd'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

  • is it possible to turn off vdso on glibc side?

    - by heroxbd
    I am aware that passing vdso=0 to kernel can turn this feature off, and that the dynamic linker in glibc can automatic detect and use vdso feature from kernel. Here I met with this problem. There is a RHEL 5.6 box (kernel 2.6.18-238.el5) in my institution where I only have a normal user access, probably suffering from RHEL bug 673616. As I compile a toolchain of linux-headers-3.9/gcc-4.7.2/glibc-2.17/binutils-2.23 on top of it, gcc bootstrap fails in cc1 in stage2 cannnot be run Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x00002aaaaaaca6eb in ?? () (gdb) info sharedlibrary From To Syms Read Shared Object Library 0x00002aaaaaaabba0 0x00002aaaaaac3249 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 0x00002aaaaacd29b0 0x00002aaaaace2480 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/usr/lib/libmpc.so.3 0x00002aaaaaef2cd0 0x00002aaaaaf36c08 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/usr/lib/libmpfr.so.4 0x00002aaaab14f280 0x00002aaaab19b658 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/usr/lib/libgmp.so.10 0x00002aaaab3b3060 0x00002aaaab3b3b50 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/lib/libdl.so.2 0x00002aaaab5b87b0 0x00002aaaab5c4bb0 Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/usr/lib/libz.so.1 0x00002aaaab7d0e70 0x00002aaaab80f62c Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/lib/libm.so.6 0x00002aaaaba70d40 0x00002aaaabb81aec Yes (*) /home/benda/gnto/lib/libc.so.6 (*): Shared library is missing debugging information. and a simple program #include <sys/time.h> #include <stdio.h> int main () { struct timeval tim; gettimeofday(&tim, NULL); return 0; } get segment fault in the same way if compiled against glibc-2.17 and xgcc from stage1. Both cc1 and the test program can be run on another running RHEL 5.5 (kernel 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5) with gcc-4.7.2/glibc-2.17/binutils-2.23 as normal user. I cannot simply upgrade the box to a newer RHEL version, nor could I turn VDSO off via sysctl or proc. The question is, is there a way to compile glibc so that it turns off VDSO unconditionally?

    Read the article

1