Search Results

Search found 5 results on 1 pages for 'misteryes'.

Page 1/1 | 1 

• how to rollback/undo yum update on fedora after messing the fedora versions

  - by misteryes

  I want to install texlive on my fedora 16 laptop with the following procedure: # yum remove tex-* texlive-* # cat > /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo <<EOF [texlive] name=texlive baseurl=http://jnovy.fedorapeople.org/texlive/2012/packages.f17/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=0 EOF # yum update; # yum install texlive after yum update, I notice that my laptop is fedora 16, while I used 2012/packages.fc17/ so I modify /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo to use 2011/packages.fc16 and do yum update again however, there are many errors [root@kitty esolve]# yum update Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/cinnamon/fedora-16/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found : http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/cinnamon/fedora-16/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml Trying other mirror. Setting up Update Process Resolving Dependencies --> Running transaction check ---> Package dvipng.x86_64 0:1.14-1.fc15 will be obsoleted ---> Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-66.fc16 will be obsoleted --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: evince-dvi-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64 ---> Package mkvtoolnix.x86_64 0:5.8.0-1 will be updated ---> Package mkvtoolnix.x86_64 0:6.3.0-1 will be an update ---> Package nautilus-dropbox.x86_64 0:1.4.0-1.fc10 will be updated ---> Package nautilus-dropbox.x86_64 0:1.6.0-1.fc10 will be an update ---> Package texlive-dvipng-bin.x86_64 2:svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 2:2012-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: texlive-base for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: tex-dvipng for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libpng15.so.15()(64bit) for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.6()(64bit) for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-kpathsea.noarch 2:svn28792.0-19.fc17 will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: texlive-kpathsea-bin for package: 2:texlive-kpathsea-svn28792.0-19.fc17.noarch --> Running transaction check ---> Package kpathsea.x86_64 0:2007-66.fc16 will be obsoleted --> Processing Dependency: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) for package: evince-dvi-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-base.noarch 2:2012-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 will be installed ---> Package texlive-dvipng.noarch 2:svn26689.1.14-19.fc17 will be installed ---> Package texlive-dvipng-bin.x86_64 2:svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 will be obsoleting --> Processing Dependency: libpng15.so.15()(64bit) for package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 ---> Package texlive-kpathsea-bin.x86_64 2:svn27347.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 will be installed ---> Package texlive-kpathsea-lib.x86_64 2:2012-19.20130317_r29408.fc17 will be installed --> Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Package: evince-dvi-3.2.1-2.fc16.x86_64 (@fedora) Requires: libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) Removing: kpathsea-2007-66.fc16.x86_64 (@so-updates) libkpathsea.so.4()(64bit) Obsoleted By: 2:texlive-kpathsea-svn28792.0-19.fc17.noarch (texlive) Not found Error: Package: 2:texlive-dvipng-bin-svn26509.0-19.20130317_r29408.fc17.x86_64 (texlive) Requires: libpng15.so.15()(64bit) You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem You could try running: rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest and when I do yum install texlive, it simply tries to install the f17 version, which failed. what Can I do to install f16 version? how can I undo yum update with 2012/packages.f17/ I tried yum history, and for today's history, I only have Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit ID | Login user | Date and time | Action(s) | Altered ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 124 | esolve ... <esolve> | 2013-09-12 18:35 | Erase | 24 123 | root <root> | 2013-08-23 11:08 | Update | 1 122 | root <root> | 2013-08-21 14:13 | Update | 1 < 121 | esolve ... <esolve> | 2013-05-31 15:36 | Install | 1 > 120 | root <root> | 2013-05-29 15:13 | Install | 1 < 119 | root <root> | 2013-04-18 13:13 | Update | 1 >< which seems not related to yum update the history results: 1003 yum update 1004 vim 1005 vim /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo 1006 yum update 1007 yum install texlive 1008 vim /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo 1009 clear 1010 yum history 1011 yum history list 1012 vim 1013 vim /etc/yum.repos.d/texlive.repo 1014 yum history list 1015 history also I tried yum history undo 124 but it failed! [root@kitty esolve]# yum history undo 124 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, langpacks, presto, refresh-packagekit http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/cinnamon/fedora-16/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found : http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/leigh123linux/cinnamon/fedora-16/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml Trying other mirror. Undoing transaction 124, from Thu Sep 12 18:35:31 2013 Erase R-2.14.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase R-core-2.14.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase R-devel-2.14.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase a2ps-4.14-12.fc15.x86_64 ? Erase docbook-utils-pdf-0.6.14-29.fc16.noarch ? Erase html2ps-1.0-0.7.b7.fc15.noarch ? Erase jadetex-3.13-10.fc15.noarch ? Erase kile-2.1.1-1.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase linuxdoc-tools-0.9.66-9.fc15.x86_64 ? Erase tetex-dvipost-1.1-12.fc15.x86_64 ? Erase tex-cm-lgc-0.5-18.fc15.noarch ? Erase tex-preview-11.86-6.fc16.noarch ? Erase texinfo-tex-4.13a-15.fc15.x86_64 ? Erase texlive-2007-66.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase texlive-dvips-2007-66.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase texlive-latex-2007-66.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase texlive-texmf-2007-40.fc16.noarch ? Erase texlive-texmf-dvips-2007-40.fc16.noarch ? Erase texlive-texmf-fonts-2007-40.fc16.noarch ? Erase texlive-texmf-latex-2007-40.fc16.noarch ? Erase texlive-utils-2007-66.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase texmaker-1:3.2.2-1.fc16.x86_64 ? Erase texmf-RR-Inria-4.11-inria.0.noarch ? Erase xdvik-22.84.14-9.fc15.x86_64 ? Error: No package(s) available to install

  Read the article

• using python Paramiko for ssh: sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified

  - by misteryes

  I want to use paramiko to ssh into a bunch a remote nodes and run some command line with root priviledge I have ssh key in my home directory and so i don't need to input password when I ssh into those remote nodes but when running the following script: def connect(hostname): ssh = paramiko.SSHClient() ssh.set_missing_host_key_policy(paramiko.AutoAddPolicy()) ssh.connect(hostname, username='niky', pkey=paramiko.RSAKey.from_private_key(open('id_rsa'), 'passwd'), timeout = 240.0) return ssh def run(hostname): ssh = connect(hostname) (stdin, stdout, stderr) = ssh.exec_command("sudo ls") res = stderr.readlines() print hostname+': '+''.join(str(elem) for elem in res)+'\n' run(remote.nity.com) I got the following error: remote.nity.com: sudo: no tty present and no askpass program specified if I don't add sudo before ls everything works fine what are potential reasons ? thanks!

  Read the article

• private address in traceroute results

  - by misteryes

  I use traceroute to check paths on a remote host, and I notice that there are some private IPs, like 10.230.10.1 bash-4.0# traceroute -T 132.227.62.122 traceroute to 132.227.62.122 (132.227.62.122), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets 1 194.199.68.161 (194.199.68.161) 1.103 ms 1.107 ms 1.097 ms 2 sw-ptu.univ.run (10.230.10.1) 1.535 ms 1.625 ms 2.172 ms 3 sw-univ-gazelle.univ.run (10.10.20.1) 6.891 ms 6.937 ms 6.927 ms 4 10.10.5.6 (10.10.5.6) 1.544 ms 1.517 ms 1.518 ms why there are private addresses near the host? what are the purposes that these private addresses are used? I mean why they want to put the public IP behind private IPs? thanks!

  Read the article

• TCP video streaming: TCP throughput(rate) and RTT

  - by misteryes

  we know that a rough estimation of TCP rate is: WINDOW/RTT, where WINDOW is the min(CWIN, RWIN), CWIN is the congestion window size of the sender, while RWIN is the receiving window. nowadays, the encoding rate of videos may be 1000KB/s(8000kbit/s), if RTT is 500ms, it needs the window size to be 2000KB. But we know that usually the receiving window size is below 64KB, there is a big gap. so if RTT is too large, TCP streaming is not possible? Is my understanding right? thanks!

  Read the article

• Why does TCP sometimes not acknowledge the packets it receives?

  - by misteryes

  I use firefox to visit a web server running on a computer on my LAN. I notice that sometimes TCP doesn't acknowledge the packets it receives. For example, in the following captured packets: https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B-LaBUj9KtQhS0RYNXF1RjZTa2M/edit?usp=sharing the 7th 9th and 11th packets are duplicated ACK, the browser receives TCP packets 6,8 and 10, but the browser TCP stack doesn't acknowledge the received packets, why?

  Read the article

1