Search Results

Search found 1488 results on 60 pages for 'kohana orm'.

Page 10/60 | < Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >

  • Where do I place a set_locale in Kohana PHP framework?

    - by janoChen
    In the following tutorial: http://pinoytech.org/blog/post/Kohana-2.4-I18N-internationalization-and-localization-Library the author says: I'd put it in a Base Controller so that all Controllers inherit it. this is the code: I18n::set_locale('tl_PH'); I tried placing it in all the controller and places I could but is not working. Which is the exact place where I should place it?

    Read the article

  • PHP PSR-0 + several namespaces in one file and autoload

    - by Nemoden
    I've been thinking for a while about defining several namespaces in one php file and so, having several classes inside this file. Suppose, I want to implement something like Doctrine\ORM\Query\Expr: Expr.php Expr |-- Andx.php |-- Base.php |-- Comparison.php |-- Composite.php |-- From.php |-- Func.php |-- GroupBy.php |-- Join.php |-- Literal.php |-- Math.php |-- OrderBy.php |-- Orx.php `-- Select.php It would be nice if I had all of this in one file - Expr.php: namespace Doctrine\ORM\Query; class Expr { // code } namespace Doctrine\ORM\Query\Expr; class Func { // code } // etc... What I'm thinking of is directories naming convention and, unlike PSR-0 having several classes and namespaces in one file. It's best explained by the code: ls Doctrine/orm/query Expr.php that's it - only Expr.php Since Expr.php is somewhat I call a "meta-namespace" for Expr\Func, it make sense to place all the classes inside Expr.php (as shown above). So, the vendor name is still starts with an uppercased letter (Doctrine) and the other parts of namespace start with lowercased letter. We can write an autoload so it would respect this notion: function load_class($class) { if (class_exists($class)) { return true; } $tokenized_path = explode(array("_", "\\"), DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR, $class); // array('Doctrine', 'orm', 'query', 'Expr', 'Func'); // ^^^^ // first, we are looking for first uppercased namespace part // and if it's not last (not the class name), we use it as a filename // and wiping away the rest to compose a path to a file we need to include if (FALSE !== ($meta_class_index = find_meta_class($tokenized_path))) { $new_tokenized_path = array_slice($tokenized_path, 0, $meta_class_index); $path_to_class = implode(DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR, $new_tokenized_path); } else { // no meta class found $path_to_class = implode(DIRECTORY_SEPARATOR, $tokenized_path); } if (file_exists($path_to_class.'.php')) { require_once $path_to_class.'.php'; } return false; } Another reason to do so is to reduce a number of php files scattered among directories. Usually you check file existence before you require a file to fail gracefully: file_exists($path_to_class.'.php'); If you take a look at actual Doctrine\ORM\Query\Expr code, you'll see they use all of the "inner-classes", so you actually do: file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/AndX.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Base.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Comparison.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Composite.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/From.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Func.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/GroupBy.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Join.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Literal.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Math.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/OrderBy.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Orx.php"); file_exists("/path/to/Doctrine/ORM/Query/Expr/Select.php"); in your autoload which causes quite a few I/O reads. Isn't it too much to check on each user's hit? I'm just putting this on a discussion. I want to hear from another PHP programmers what do they think of it. And, of course, if you have a silver bullet addressing this problems I've designated here, please share. I also have been thinking if my vogue question fits here and according to the FAQ it seems like this question addresses "software architecture" problem slash proposal. I'm sorry if my scribble may seem a bit clunky :) Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Is it worth a try LINQ to SQL as a beginner to an ORM?

    - by Pandiya Chendur
    Thus far used sql server stored procedures for all my web applications... Now thought of moving to an ORM... I would like to ask SO users about LINQ to SQL Is Linq to sql worth a try as a beginner to an ORM? or should i look for some others... Any suggestion... EDIT: I have a sql server 2005 database with all tables.... How to use this db with Linq to sql?

    Read the article

  • Using an ORM with a database that has no defined relationships?

    - by Ahmad
    Consider a database(MSSQL 2005) that consists of 100+ tables which have primary keys defined to a certain degree. There are 'relationships' between tables, however these are not enforced with foreign key constraints. Consider the following simplified example of typical types of tables I am dealing with. The are clear relations between the User and City and Province tables. However, they key issues is the inconsistent data types in the tables and naming conventions. User: UserRowId [int] PK Name [varchar(50)] CityId [smallint] ProvinceRowId [bigint] City: CityRowId [bigint] PK CityDescription [varchar(100)] Province: ProvinceId [int] PK ProvinceDesc [varchar(50)] I am considering a rewrite of the application (in ASP.net MVC) that uses this data source as is similar in design to MVC storefront. However I am going through a proof of concept phase and this is one of the stumbling blocks I have come across. What are my options in terms of ORM choice that can be easily used and why? Should I even be considering an ORM? (The reason I ask this is that most explanations and tutorials all work with relatively cleanly designed existing databases, or newly created ones when compared to mine. I am thus having a very hard time trying to find a way forward with this problem) There is a huge amount of existing SQL queries, would a datamappper(eg IBatis.net) be more suitable since we could easily modify them to work and reuse the investment already made? I have found this question on SO which indicates to me that an ORM can be used - however I get the impression that this a question of mapping? Note: at the moment, the object model is not clearly defined as it was non-existent. The existing system pretty much did almost everything in SQL or consisted of overly complicated, and numerous queries to complete fucntionality. I am pretty much a noob and have zero experience around ORMs and MVC - so this an awesome learning curve I am on.

    Read the article

  • Are there good reasons not to use an ORM?

    - by hangy
    During my apprenticeship, I have used NHibernate for some smaller projects which I mostly coded and designed on my own. Now, before starting some bigger project, the discussion arose how to design data access and whether or not to use an ORM layer. As I am still in my apprenticeship and still consider myself a beginner in enterprise programming, I did not really try to push in my opinion, which is that using an object relational mapper to the database can ease development quite a lot. The other coders in the development team are much more experienced than me, so I think I will just do what they say. :-) However, I do not completely understand two of the main reasons for not using NHibernate or a similar project: One can just build one’s own data access objects with SQL queries and copy those queries out of Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio. Debugging an ORM can be hard. So, of course I could just build my data access layer with a lot of SELECTs etc, but here I miss the advantage of automatic joins, lazy-loading proxy classes and a lower maintenance effort if a table gets a new column or a column gets renamed. (Updating numerous SELECT, INSERT and UPDATE queries vs. updating the mapping config and possibly refactoring the business classes and DTOs.) Also, using NHibernate you can run into unforeseen problems if you do not know the framework very well. That could be, for example, trusting the Table.hbm.xml where you set a string’s length to be automatically validated. However, I can also imagine similar bugs in a “simple” SqlConnection query based data access layer. Finally, are those arguments mentioned above really a good reason not to utilise an ORM for a non-trivial database based enterprise application? Are there probably other arguments they/I might have missed? (I should probably add that I think this is like the first “big” .NET/C# based application which will require teamwork. Good practices, which are seen as pretty normal on Stack Overflow, such as unit testing or continuous integration, are non-existing here up to now.)

    Read the article

  • Merits of .NET ORM data access methods Enity Framework vs. NHibernate vs. Subsonic vs. ADO.NET Datas

    - by Lloyd
    I have recently heard "fanboys" of different .NET ORM methodologies express strong, if not outlandish oppinions of other ORM methodologies. And frankly feel a bit in the dark. Could you please explain the key merits of each of these .NET ORM solutions? Entity Framework NHibernate Subsonic ADO.NET Datasets I have a good understanding of 1&4, and a cursory understanding of 2&3, but apparently not enough to understand the implied cultural perceptions of one towards the other.

    Read the article

  • How to integrate access control with my ORM in a .net windows form application?

    - by Ying
    I am developing a general database query tools, a .Net 3.5 Windows Form application. In order to make the presentation layer is independent of the database layer. I use an ORM framework, XPO from DevExpress. But, I have no access control function built in. I surfed Internet and I found in WCF Data Services, there is an interesting concept, Interceptor, which is following AOP(Aspect Oriented Programming). I am wondering who has such an experience to build access control in ORM. My basic requirement is : It should be a general method and controlled by users in runtime. So any hard coding is not acceptable. It could be based on attribute, database table, or even an external assembly. I am willing to buy a ready solution. According to the idea of AOP, an access control function can be integrated with existing functions easily and nearly not knowingly to the previous developer;) Any suggestions are welcome.

    Read the article

  • Is there an ORM with APIs to be used programatically?

    - by Kabeer
    Hello. Neither did not get any response for my previous question, nor enough views :) So here I am now framing my query afresh. Is there any ORM that offers APIs to be used programatically? In my situation, a user will be helped through a wizard to define some entities. Thereafter those entites will be created in a database in form of tables (there will of course be some improvization). I need an ORM that offers APIs for modeling and creating entities during application runtime and not just during design time. Mine is a .Net application, therefore I was looking at Entity Framework. However, to me it looked tied to Visual Studio (I may be wrong also as I am new to it). Any recommendations? Or alternative point of view?

    Read the article

  • just can't get a controller to work

    - by Asaf
    I try to get into mysite/user so that application/classes/controller/user.php should be working, now this is my file tree: code of controller/user.php: <?php defined('SYSPATH') OR die('No direct access allowed.'); class Controller_User extends Controller_Default { public $template = 'user'; function action_index() { //$view = View::factory('user'); //$view->render(TRUE); $this->template->message = 'hello, world!'; } } ?> code of controller/default.php: <?php defined('SYSPATH') OR die('No direct access allowed.'); class Controller_default extends Controller_Template { } bootstrap.php: <?php defined('SYSPATH') or die('No direct script access.'); //-- Environment setup -------------------------------------------------------- /** * Set the default time zone. * * @see http://kohanaframework.org/guide/using.configuration * @see http://php.net/timezones */ date_default_timezone_set('America/Chicago'); /** * Set the default locale. * * @see http://kohanaframework.org/guide/using.configuration * @see http://php.net/setlocale */ setlocale(LC_ALL, 'en_US.utf-8'); /** * Enable the Kohana auto-loader. * * @see http://kohanaframework.org/guide/using.autoloading * @see http://php.net/spl_autoload_register */ spl_autoload_register(array('Kohana', 'auto_load')); /** * Enable the Kohana auto-loader for unserialization. * * @see http://php.net/spl_autoload_call * @see http://php.net/manual/var.configuration.php#unserialize-callback-func */ ini_set('unserialize_callback_func', 'spl_autoload_call'); //-- Configuration and initialization ----------------------------------------- /** * Initialize Kohana, setting the default options. * * The following options are available: * * - string base_url path, and optionally domain, of your application NULL * - string index_file name of your index file, usually "index.php" index.php * - string charset internal character set used for input and output utf-8 * - string cache_dir set the internal cache directory APPPATH/cache * - boolean errors enable or disable error handling TRUE * - boolean profile enable or disable internal profiling TRUE * - boolean caching enable or disable internal caching FALSE */ Kohana::init(array( 'base_url' => '/mysite/', 'index_file' => FALSE, )); /** * Attach the file write to logging. Multiple writers are supported. */ Kohana::$log->attach(new Kohana_Log_File(APPPATH.'logs')); /** * Attach a file reader to config. Multiple readers are supported. */ Kohana::$config->attach(new Kohana_Config_File); /** * Enable modules. Modules are referenced by a relative or absolute path. */ Kohana::modules(array( 'auth' => MODPATH.'auth', // Basic authentication 'cache' => MODPATH.'cache', // Caching with multiple backends 'codebench' => MODPATH.'codebench', // Benchmarking tool 'database' => MODPATH.'database', // Database access 'image' => MODPATH.'image', // Image manipulation 'orm' => MODPATH.'orm', // Object Relationship Mapping 'pagination' => MODPATH.'pagination', // Paging of results 'userguide' => MODPATH.'userguide', // User guide and API documentation )); /** * Set the routes. Each route must have a minimum of a name, a URI and a set of * defaults for the URI. */ Route::set('default', '(<controller>(/<action>(/<id>)))') ->defaults(array( 'controller' => 'welcome', 'action' => 'index', )); /** * Execute the main request. A source of the URI can be passed, eg: $_SERVER['PATH_INFO']. * If no source is specified, the URI will be automatically detected. */ echo Request::instance() ->execute() ->send_headers() ->response; ?> .htaccess: RewriteEngine On RewriteBase /mysite/ RewriteRule ^(application|modules|system) - [F,L] RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-f RewriteCond %{REQUEST_FILENAME} !-d RewriteRule .* index.php/$0 [PT,L] Trying to go to http://localhost/ makes the "hello world" page, from the welcome.php Trying to go to http://localhost/mysite/user give me this: The requested URL /mysite/user was not found on this server.

    Read the article

  • Enhanced LINQ to SQL Compatible ORM Solution from Devart

    Devart has recently announced the release of LinqConnect - an enhanced LINQ to SQL compatible ORM solution with extended functionality, support for SQL Server, Oracle, MySQL, PostgreSQL, and SQLite, its own visual model designer, seamlessly integrating to Visual Studio, and SQL monitoring tool. LinqConnect allows you to quickly create mapping model and generate data access layer code for your application, greatly decreasing development time and eliminating the need to work over routine tasks. It...Did you know that DotNetSlackers also publishes .net articles written by top known .net Authors? We already have over 80 articles in several categories including Silverlight. Take a look: here.

    Read the article

  • Setter Validation can affect performance?

    - by TiagoBrenck
    Whitin a scenario where you use an ORM to map your entities to the DB, and you have setter validations (nullable, date lower than today validation, etc) every time the ORM get a result, it will pass into the setter to instance the object. If I have a grid that usually returns 500 records, I assume that for each record it passes on all validations. If my entity has 5 setter validations, than I have passed in 2.500 validations. Does those 2.500 validations will affect the performance? If was 15.000 validation, it will be different? In my opinion, and according to this answer (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4893558/calling-setters-from-a-constructor/4893604#4893604), setter validation is usefull than constructors validation. Is there a way to avoid unecessary validation, since I am safe that the values I send to DB when saving the entity wont change until I edit it on my system?

    Read the article

  • how to count all distinct records in many-to-many relations in django ORM?

    - by marduk-pl
    hi, i have two models: class Project(models.Model): categories = models.ManyToManyField(Category) class Category(models.Model): name = models.CharField() now, i make some queryset: query = Project.objects.filter(id__in=[1,2,3,4]) and i like to get list of all distinct categories in this queryset with count of projects with refering to these categories - exactly i would like to get that results: category1 - 10 projects category2 - 5 projects that is opposite to this query: query2 = query.annotate(Count('categories')) what return me: project1 - 2categories project2 - 7categories how can i make it in django ORM?

    Read the article

  • Can I use an ORM (as Subsonic) to work with an API?

    - by Gabotron
    Hello ... I´m new to ORMs and I have a new project I´ll do in .Net MVC. In the Model Layer I´ll create my classes: Videos and I´ll work with APIs as a DataLayer (BrightCove & YouTube APIs). So, I dont have a Relational Database as a Data Layer. Is it possible to work with an ORM (as Subsonic)? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Error: Class 'Haml' not found... trying to use Haml (Kohaml) with Kohana

    - by Serhiy
    Can't for the life of me figure out what I'm doing wrong... Downloaded Kohaml from http://github.com/transphorm/kohaml Dropped it into modules/kohaml # My Bootstrap reference 'kohaml' => MODPATH.'kohaml', // kohaml Keep getting this error... (snapshot of the error and my modules folder) http://wellcommentedcode.com/stack_kohaml_question/ Any suggestions on what I might be doing wrong would be highly appreciated... thanks.

    Read the article

  • Extending Controller

    - by MakDotGNU
    Hi, I'm very new to Kohana and I'm trying to make a project in kohana 2.x, in my previous projects i had created a Base controller which used to extends Controller. and all other controller to Base_Controller. in Kohana I'm facing the problem. here is my structure. class Base_Controller extends Template_Controller class Home_Controller extends Base_Controller both these Controllers are in application/controller folder Fatal error: Class 'Base_Controller' not found in /home/myadav/public_html/innteract/innteract/controllers/home.php on line 2

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17  | Next Page >