I am trying to get Composer do download the latest commit for the Behat/MinkSelenium2Driver package. That particular repo only has a master branch. I have tried every method I can think of, including deleting the files and letting it pull them back in, to get it to work but it doesn't.
How would I get it to pull in latest committed files or at least those from the commit I list below?
Specifically I want to get this commit:
https://github.com/Behat/MinkSelenium2Driver/commit/2e73d8134ec8526b6e742f05c146fec2d5e1b8d6
Thanks,
Patrick
Two of version controls uses seem to dictate different checkin styles.
distibution centric: changesets will generally reflect a complete feature. In general these checkins will be larger. This style is more user/maintainer friendly.
rollback centric: changesets will be individual small steps so the history can function like an incredibly powerful undo. In general these checkins will be smaller. This style is more developer friendly.
I like to use my version control as really powerful undo while while I banging away at some stubborn code/bug. In this way I'm not afraid to make drastic changes just to try out a possible solution. However, this seems to give me a fragmented file history with lots of "well that didn't work" checkins.
If instead I try to have my changeset reflect complete features I loose the use of my version control software for experimentation. However, it is much easier for user/maintainers to figure out how the code is evolving. Which has great advantages for code reviews, managing multiple branches, etc.
So what's a developer to do? checkin small steps or complete features?
I'm new to stackoverflow and I'm looking for a question list, like the one on top, which just contains questions about interested tags. For example I'm interested in Java, but I have no clue about Python and questions about python clutters my questions page. I don't have answers concerning any python problem. I think it's too exhausting to enter my interested tags in the search combined with [xxx] OR. Is there a usable way to do this?
By the way, what for are interested tags used right now? I added some in my profile but didn't see a benefit.
I'd like to use some semantic [X]HTML tags instead of <div>s: <article>, <product>, <footer> etc. Some of them are already presented in the upcoming HTML5, however, it's not fully supported.
Which are the possible cons I might face when Rendering? Using CSS, JS?
The one I remember is: IE6 can't clone tags it doesn't know.
I am working on a small project with gist and since it is growing I would like to put it on github.
Let's suppose that:
my gist repo is at: https://gist.github.com/1234
my new (empty) repo is at: https://github.com/ChrisJamesC/myNewProject
The ideal solution would be one that pushes my changes on both the gist and the github repository. However, if it is not possible I will prefer the solution where everything is on github and I delete the gist.
Gitorious has been around longer and the two sites seem to cover the same ground, yet a quick Google Fight shows Github almost two orders of magnitude higher.
Is there a larger distinction that I'm not aware of?
I have a large cross-cutting commit that I would like to split up according to the authors whose code was affected, both to increase the reviewers' familiarity with the code they're reviewing, and to divide the review burden equitably.
I realize that the blame may be mixed within a given hunk, in which case it would be nice to either collect multiple reviewers or just choose the most "blameworthy" one (breaking ties arbitrarily is fine).
The tags as used in OneNote is very different from EverNote. EverNote uses tags as gmail uses labels to classify emails. Is it possible to classify OneNote pages using tags / labels on the go? If so, would you please explain how to do it?
I have the following situation:
A software hosted at github.
4 developers, each have her own fork in github.
Each developer creates and develops using branches in her own fork.
Given that we use branches to develop, we want to merge our branches (in our forks) to the upstream repo. How do I merge in github without using pull request? Is it possible to merge to upstream from my own fork?
Thanks in advance.
Hello Everyone,
I am currently designing a focused webcrawler. I have it tested with some websites until i encountered below anchor ("the <a href="..."):
href="javascript: openDocument('DATA//PCP200803.pdf');"
My html parsing routine results to
javascript: openDocument('DATA//PCP200803.pdf');
Does anyone have any idea on how to download the referenced document?
Thanks a lot.
I'm doing a pull origin some_branch and can see there are a lot of changes. Eventually I don't mind if their erase all mine.
How can I accept them all instead or using mergetool and merge files one by one?
I am responsible for a small development team and we deal mainly with database development. We are currently using MS Visual Source Safe as our source control system, but it has its limitations and we are seriously thinking about changing. What system would you choose?
I can't seem to use any of the grails ui plugins such as richui or grails-ui. I used grails install-plugin to install them, and grails list-plugins shows that they are correctly installed. However, whenever I use their provided taglibs in my views, I get this exception:
Tag [tabview] does not exist. No tag library found for namespace: gui
or
Tag [tabview] does not exist. No tag library found for namespace: richui
I'd really like to use these features, but cannot figure out how to get grails to recognize that the tag libraries are installed.
Not real information:
$ ssh-keygen -t rsa -C "[email protected]"
Generating public/private rsa key pair.
Enter file in which to save the key (/c/Users/Tekkub/.ssh/id_rsa):
ssh.txt
I entered a file name here. Not sure if i should have,
Enter passphrase (empty for no passphrase):
I am stuck here. I type and it doesnt work
It would be really nice if there is some easy way to see what have changed in a certain class (or other file) between two releases (1.6 & 2.1 for example). Does anyone know how to do this?
A way to do it online would be great but downloading the code and checking offline would be ok as well.
I am contributing code to an open source project which requires that no tabs exist in source code(only spaces). I am sure I have used tabs accidentally in some places, and want to clean up my code before I submit a patch. How can I find uses of tabs in a commit range?
So we're required to use the following order for CSS anchor pseudo-classes
a:link { color: red }
a:visited { color: blue }
a:hover { color: yellow }
a:active { color: lime }
But my question is why bother with the a:link part? Rather, is there any advantage to the above (other than perhaps clarity) over:
a { color:red; } /* notice no :link part */
a:visited { color: blue; }
etc.,etc.
Hello, Im searching for ideas to solve the following problem:
I'm loading an URL (any for that matter) into an iFrame, and then block (server side) all image tags, o object tags before sending the page to the client.
--
What I was thinking to do is: fetching the URL, and then manipulating the fetched content using a Java library (any recomendation on that matter?). And after that, send the modify content to que client.
Would that be the best approach to solve this problem? suggestions are wellcome :)
I've been using the SHA1 hashes of my commits as references in documentation, etc. I've realized that if I need to rewrite those commits, I'll need to create a lookup table to correspond the hashes for the original repo with the hashes for the filtered repo. Since these are effectively UUID's, a simple lookup table would do.
I think that it's relatively straightforward to write a script to do this during a filter-branch run; that's not really my question, though if there are some gotchas that make it complicated, I'd certainly like to hear about them. I'm really wondering if there are any tools that provide this functionality, or if there is some sort of convention on where to keep the lookup table/what to call it? I'd prefer not to do things in a completely idiosyncratic way.