Search Results

Search found 1739 results on 70 pages for 'castle activerecord'.

Page 11/70 | < Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >

  • NHibernate.Bytecode.UnableToLoadProxyFactoryFactoryException

    - by Shane
    I have the following code set up in my Startup IDictionary properties = new Dictionary(); properties.Add("connection.driver_class", "NHibernate.Driver.SqlClientDriver"); properties.Add("dialect", "NHibernate.Dialect.MsSql2005Dialect"); properties.Add("proxyfactory.factory_class", "NNHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle"); properties.Add("connection.provider", "NHibernate.Connection.DriverConnectionProvider"); properties.Add("connection.connection_string", "Data Source=ZEUS;Initial Catalog=mydb;Persist Security Info=True;User ID=sa;Password=xxxxxxxx"); InPlaceConfigurationSource source = new InPlaceConfigurationSource(); source.Add(typeof(ActiveRecordBase), (IDictionary<string, string>) properties); Assembly asm = Assembly.Load("Repository"); Castle.ActiveRecord.ActiveRecordStarter.Initialize(asm, source); I am getting the following error: failed: NHibernate.Bytecode.UnableToLoadProxyFactoryFactoryException : Unable to load type 'NNHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.ProxyFactoryFactory, NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle' during configuration of proxy factory class. Possible causes are: - The NHibernate.Bytecode provider assembly was not deployed. - The typeName used to initialize the 'proxyfactory.factory_class' property of the session-factory section is not well formed. I have read and read I am referecning the All the assemblies listed and I am at a total loss as what to try next. Castle.ActiveRecord.dll Castle.DynamicProxy2.dll Iesi.Collections.dll log4net.dll NHibernate.dll NHibernate.ByteCode.Castle.dll I am 100% sure the assembly is in the bin. Anyone have any ideas?

    Read the article

  • ActiveRecord + CodeIgniter - Return single value from query, not in array form.

    - by txmail
    Say you construct an activerecord query that will always just return a single value, how do you just address that single value instead of getting an array in return? For instance I am using an ActiveRecord query to return the SUM of a single column, it will only return this one single SUM, instead of having to parse the array is there a way to assign the value as a function return equal to that value instead of getting an array?

    Read the article

  • How do you install Castle Windsor IOC?

    - by user300266
    I'm currently reading Pro ASP.NET MVC Framework by Sanderson. In the book he recommends setting up IoC using Castle Windsor, and he points out that the download automatically installs it and registers the Castle DLLs in the GAC. Well, at this point in time (5/4/2010), the Castle Project no longer has a downloadable installer that sets this up. Its all broken out into their individual subprojects with the raw files contained in zipped folders. Sadly there's no installation documentation that I can find about how to set it up. Being the noob that I am, I'm stuck and now forced to ask #1 where should castle windsor live on my hard drive? #2 how do I manually register the dlls properly? And, #3 should I be angry at the project maintainers for their oversight? Here's the link: http://www.castleproject.org/castle/download.html

    Read the article

  • Does ActiveRecord make Ruby on Rails code hard to test?

    - by Erik Öjebo
    I've spent most of my time in statically typed languages (primarily C#). I have some bad experiences with the Active Record pattern and unit testing, because of the static methods and the mix of entities and data access code. Since the Ruby community probably is the most test driven of the communities out there, and the Rails ActiveRecord seems popular, there must be some way of combining TDD and ActiveRecord based code in Ruby on Rails. I would guess that the problem goes away in dynamic languages, somehow, but I don't see how. So, what's the trick?

    Read the article

  • has_one and has_many associations: which side of the association is saved first

    - by SeeBees
    I have three simplified models: class Team < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :players has_one :coach end class Player < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :team validates_presence_of :team_id end class Coach < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :team validates_presence_of :team_id end I use the following code to test these models: t = Team.new team.coach = Coach.new team.save! team.save! returns true. But in another test: t = Team.new team.players << Player.new team.save! team.save! gives the following error: > ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: > Validation failed: Players is invalid > from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1090:in > `save_without_dirty!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/dirty.rb:87:in `save_without_transactions!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:136:in > `transaction' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:182:in > `transaction' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:208:in > `rollback_active_record_state!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from (irb):14 I figured out when team.save! is called, it first calls player.save!. player needs to validate the presence of the id of the associated team. But at the time player.save! is called, team hasn't been saved yet, and therefore, team_id doesn't yet exist for player. This fails the player's validation, so the error occurs. But on the other hand, team is saved before coach.save!, otherwise the first example will get the same error as the second. So I've concluded that when a has_many bs, a.save! will save bs prior to a. When a has_one b, a.save! will save a prior to b. If I am right, why is this the case? It doesn't seem logical to me. Why has_one and has_many association have different order in saving? Any ideas? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • When saving a model with has_one or has_many associations, which side of the association is saved fi

    - by SeeBees
    I have three simplified models: class Team < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :players has_one :coach end class Player < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :team validates_presence_of :team_id end class Coach < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :team validates_presence_of :team_id end I use the following code to test these models: t = Team.new team.coach = Coach.new team.save! team.save! returns true. But in another test: t = Team.new team.players << Player.new team.save! team.save! gives the following error: > ActiveRecord::RecordInvalid: > Validation failed: Players is invalid > from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/validations.rb:1090:in > `save_without_dirty!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/dirty.rb:87:in `save_without_transactions!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/database_statements.rb:136:in > `transaction' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:182:in > `transaction' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:208:in > `rollback_active_record_state!' from > /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.4/lib/active_record/transactions.rb:200:in > `save!' from (irb):14 I figured out that when team.save! is called, it first calls player.save!. player needs to validate the presence of the id of the associated team. But at the time player.save! is called, team hasn't been saved yet, and therefore, team_id doesn't yet exist for player. This fails the player's validation, so the error occurs. But on the other hand, team is saved before coach.save!, otherwise the first example will get the same error as the second one. So I've concluded that when a has_many bs, a.save! will save bs prior to a. When a has_one b, a.save! will save a prior to b. If I am right, why is this the case? It doesn't seem logical to me. Why do has_one and has_many association have different order in saving? Any ideas? And is there any way I can change the order? Say I want to have the same saving order for both has_one and has_many. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can I inject an object into an WCF IErrorHandler implementation with Castle Windsor?

    - by Michael Johnson
    I'm developing a set of services using WCF. The application is doing dependency injection with Castle Windsor. I've added an IErrorHandler implementation that is added to services via an attribute. Everything is working thus far. The IErrorHandler object (of a class called FaultHandler is being applied properly and invoked. Now I'm adding logging. Castle Windsor is set up to inject the logger object (an instance of IOurLogger). This is working. But when I try to add it to FaultHandler my logger is null. The code for FaultHandler looks something like this: class FaultHandler : IErrorHandler { public IOurLogger logger { get; set; } public bool HandleError(Exception error) { logger.Write("Exception type {0}. Message: {1}", error.GetType(), error.Message); // Let WCF handle things its way. We only want to log. return false; } public void ProvideFault(Exception error, MessageVersion version, Message fault) { } } This throws it's own exception, since logger is null when HandleError() is called. The logger is being successfully injected into the service itself and is usable there, but for some reason I can't use it in FaultHandler. Update: Here is the relevant part of the Windsor configuration file (edited to protect the innocent): <configuration> <components> <component id="Logger" service="Our.Namespace.IOurLogger, Our.Namespace" type="Our.Namespace.OurLogger, Our.Namespace" /> </components> </configuration>

    Read the article

  • Implenting ActiveRecord with inheritance?

    - by King
    I recently converted an old application that was using XML files as the data store to use SQL instead. To avoid a lot of changes I basically created ActiveRecord style classes that inherited from the original business objects. For example SomeClassRecord :SomeClass //ID Property //Save method I then used this new class in place of the other one, because of polymorphism I didn't need to change any methods that took SomeClass as a parameter. Would this be considered 'Bad'? What would be a better alternative?

    Read the article

  • Is there an equivalent for ActiveRecord#find_by equivalent for C#?

    - by Benjamin Manns
    I'm originally a C# developer (as a hobby), but as of late I have been digging into Ruby on Rails and I am really enjoying it. Right now I am building an application in C# and I was wondering if there is any collection implementation for C# that could match (or "semi-match") the find_by method of ActiveRecord. What I am essentially looking for is a list that would hold Rectangles: class Rectangle { public int Width { get; set; } public int Height { get; set; } public String Name { get; set; } } Where I could query this list and find all entries with Height = 10, Width = 20, or name = "Block". This was done with ActiveRecord by doing a call similar to Rectangle.find_by_name('Block'). The only way I can think of doing this in C# is to create my own list implementation and iterate through each item manually checking each item against the criteria. I fear I would be reinventing the wheel (and one of poorer quality). Any input or suggestions is much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Using Castle DynamicProxy is it possible to change the invocation target on class proxy?

    - by Gareth D
    Hi Using Castle DynamicProxy v2, I'd like to change the target of an invocation for a class proxy. The new target is simply a different instance of the same type as the original target. The target types do not implement a common interface so I cannot use the IProxyTargetAccessor as detailed in Krzysztof's post on the subject - I cannot cast from a class proxy invocator to a IProxyTargetAccessor. Is there a way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Castle Dynamic Proxy is it possible to intercept value types?

    - by JS Future Software
    Hi, I have a problem and can not find answer and any tip if it is possible to intercept value types in C# by Castle dynamic proxy? I want to intercept IDictionary with INotifyChanged interface. I need this to update view when presenter is changing model. Boxing decimal in object only for making interface is not good idea... maybe somebody have idea how to intrcept value types? Thanks to all answers

    Read the article

  • Rails with Oracle often got "no listener" error

    - by qichunren
    I am on Rails 2.3.5 and use oracle 10 as my database,use oracle_adapter ,ruby-oci8 to connect oracle host. But I often got exception as the log info show: Completed in 463ms (View: 18, DB: 166) | 200 OK [http://192.168.30.128/auctions?page=1] /!\ FAILSAFE /!\ Mon Feb 01 19:02:11 +0800 2010 Status: 500 Internal Server Error ORA-12541: TNS:no listener env.c:257:in oci8lib.so /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/ruby-oci8-1.0.7/lib/oci8.rb:229:in `initialize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle-adapter-1.0.0.9250/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb:623:in `new' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle-adapter-1.0.0.9250/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb:623:in `new_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle-adapter-1.0.0.9250/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb:659:in `initialize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle-adapter-1.0.0.9250/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb:35:in `new' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle-adapter-1.0.0.9250/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/oracle_adapter.rb:35:in `oracle_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:223:in `send' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:223:in `new_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:245:in `checkout_new_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:188:in `checkout' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:184:in `loop' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:184:in `checkout' /usr/local/ruby187/lib/ruby/1.8/monitor.rb:242:in `synchronize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:183:in `checkout' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:98:in `connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:326:in `retrieve_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:123:in `retrieve_connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_specification.rb:115:in `connection' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:9:in `cache' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/query_cache.rb:28:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.3.5/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/connection_pool.rb:361:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/string_coercion.rb:25:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/head.rb:9:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/methodoverride.rb:24:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/params_parser.rb:15:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/session/cookie_store.rb:93:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/failsafe.rb:26:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/lock.rb:11:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/lock.rb:11:in `synchronize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/rack-1.0.1/lib/rack/lock.rb:11:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:114:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/reloader.rb:34:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:108:in `call' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/cgi_process.rb:44:in `dispatch_cgi' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:101:in `dispatch_cgi' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/actionpack-2.3.5/lib/action_controller/dispatcher.rb:27:in `dispatch' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:76:in `process' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:74:in `synchronize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/rails.rb:74:in `process' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:159:in `process_client' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `each' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:158:in `process_client' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `initialize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `new' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:285:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `initialize' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `new' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel.rb:268:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:282:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:281:in `each' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/configurator.rb:281:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:128:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/../lib/mongrel/command.rb:212:in `run' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/gems/mongrel-1.1.5/bin/mongrel_rails:281 /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin/mongrel_rails:19:in `load' /home/qichunren/.gem/ruby/1.8/bin/mongrel_rails:19 it seems that connection to oracle often disconnect.it show oracle error:ORA-12541: TNS:no listener How to fix this ? Many tks. oci8.c:270:in oci8lib.so: ORA-12541: TNS:no listener (OCIError) from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_oci_connection.rb:223:in new' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_oci_connection.rb:223:innew_connection' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_oci_connection.rb:328:in initialize' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_oci_connection.rb:24:innew' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_oci_connection.rb:24:in initialize' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_connection.rb:9:innew' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_connection.rb:9:in create' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-oracle_enhanced-adapter-1.2.4/lib/active_record/connec tion_adapters/oracle_enhanced_adapter.rb:50:inoracle_enhanced_connection' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/c onnection_specification.rb:291:in send' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/c onnection_specification.rb:291:inconnection=' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/c onnection_specification.rb:259:in retrieve_connection' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/connection_adapters/abstract/c onnection_specification.rb:78:inconnection' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:2438:in quoted_table_ name' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1259:infind_one' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:1250:in find_from_ids ' from /opt/ruby-enterprise-1.8.7/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/activerecord-2.0.2/lib/active_record/base.rb:504:infind' from script/maintenance/adjust_settlement.rb:19

    Read the article

  • Add save callback to a single ActiveRecord instance, is it possible?

    - by J. Pablo Fernández
    Is it possible to add a callback to a single ActiveRecord instance? As a further constraint this is to go on a library so I don't have control over the class (except to monkey-patch it). This is more or less what I want to do: def do_something_creazy message = Message.new message.on_save_call :do_even_more_crazy_stuff end def do_even_more_crazy_stuff(message) puts "Message #{message} has been saved! Hallelujah!" end

    Read the article

  • How do I aggregate activerecord model data for a specific time period?

    - by gsiener
    I'm collecting data from a system every ~10s (this time difference varies due to communication time with networked devices). I'd like to calculate averages and sums of the stored values for this activerecord model on a daily basis. All records are stored in UTC. What's the correct way to sum and average values for, e.g., the previous day from midnight to midnight EST? I can do this in sql but don't know the "rails way" to make this calculation.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18  | Next Page >