Search Results

Search found 8886 results on 356 pages for 'dns hosting'.

Page 117/356 | < Previous Page | 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124  | Next Page >

• Spoofing domains - using one domain to look at another without frame redirect

  - by hfidgen

  Hiya, In Plesk 9.2.2 does anyone know how the following can be achieved? I've got domain1.co.uk registered in plesk, but the domain has not been set up with any nameservers or A records, so it is unreachable from the web. However, I need to test it while we get the domain1.co.uk nameservers etc sorted over the next week or so. SO, i've got sparedomain.co.uk registered, with the nameservers and A records pointing to the server, and sure enough it displays the default plesk "theres no website here yet page" . bingo. Now, how can I set up sparedomain.co.uk on my plesk server, so it displays all the data held on the plesk account for domain1.co.uk? Frame forwarding doesnt work - because you get errors saying "domain1.co.uk cannot be found" in your browser - i need a server solution to spoof it all. Anyone got any ideas? Thanks!

  Read the article

• DIG command is hanging and not timing out as expected

  - by igalvez

  I ran into the following issue by accident when playing around with the DIG command and testing some domain names. Why does DIG hang and not timeout after 10 seconds when executing the following: dig +tries=1 +tries=1 +retry=1 +time=5 +trace google.us.com DIG hangs for about 30 seconds instead of timing out and then dies with the following error message: dig: couldn't get address for 'ns.reserved-domain.uk.com': no more Do I need to set another flag/option for DIG to have it timeout instead of hanging, or is this a bug? DIG version: DiG 9.9.5-3-Ubuntu

  Read the article

• Server configurations for hosting MySQL database

  - by shyam

  I have a web application which uses a MySQL database hosted on a virtual server. I've been using this server when I started the application and when the database was really small. Now it has grown and the server is not able to handle the db, causing frequent db errors. I'm planning to get a server and I need suggestions for that. Like I said, the db is now 9 GB, and is growing considerably fast. There are a number of tables with millions of rows, which are frequently updated and queried. The most frequent error the db shows is Lock wait timeout exceeded. Previously there used to be "The total number of locks exceeds the lock table size" errors too, but I could avoid it by increasing Innodb buffer pool size. Please suggest what configurations should I look for in the server I should buy. I read somewhere that the db should ideally have a buffer pool size greater than the size of its data, so in my case I guess I'd need memory gt 9 GB. What other things should I look for in the server? Just tell me if I should give you more info about the

  Read the article

• My site cant be accessed from certain ISPs

  - by Nuker

  I am on a VPS hosted by a company in Europe. I can access my site normally, many other people i know can as well. However in the recent days i have received reports from many other people that say they cant. They get a timed out request error page. The common denominator seems to be they all have the same ISPs. I have had reports from several different countries such as Spain, Peru, Argentine etc. What can be happening?

  Read the article

• Hosting 2 different SSL domains on the same IP [closed]

  - by Jim

  Possible Duplicate: Multiple SSL domains on the same IP address and same port? I have 2 different domains, domain1.com and domain2.net. Both require SSL certificates. I've got the certificates signed by a CA and now need to set them up on Apache. I've got a single IP address and have found a post here: SSL site not using the correct IP in Apache and Ubuntu that apparently works for ubuntu but I am on CentOS and have not had the same luck trying that configuration. When I try that configuration, Apache dies telling me that the port is already in use: (98)Address already in use: make_sock: could not bind to address 0.0.0.0:443 I had SSL working for a single domain but now that I've added the second, I get a browser warning about the cert not belonging to the domain. How do I get both domains to work using virtual host containers?

  Read the article

• How can i resolve all external addresses to internal address?

  - by Darian

  I am currently setting up a Linux server for a WIFI access-point. When ever someone who is connected to the hotspot/access-point? tries to reload a page they get forced onto the one page. Note: this wont have internet access! ie: user tries accessing www.google.com = it returns 192.168.1.200 or example.domain I've read that "dnsmasq" can be used to redirect any external addresses to an internal address. but haven't had any luck. Anyone have an example of a config for "dnsmasq"? I have also read that this can be done through a proxy?

  Read the article

• Possible to direct naked domain to external IP

  - by Luke

  So I found this post: configure Bind to have a custom domain on tumblr and I was trying to ask a related question: Would it be possible to set up an A record pointing traffic to domain.com to Tumblr and feed.domain.com to the IP address of my choice? In other words, by setting up a naked domain A record to Tumblr's IP, will I inherently lose traffic to feed.domain.com? Can I write another A record for the specific subdomains I want to point to my server? I hope this makes sense.

  Read the article

• Internet Connection Sharing on OSX causes delayed web requests

  - by Vanthel

  I have an iMac connected to my router via WiFi, and a PC connected by ethernet to the iMac. The iMac is sharing its connection. I've never had a problem with this in the past (pre Lion anyway) but now all web page requests take an eon to resolve on the iMac (they are instant on the PC). It suggests to me the iMac is attempting to resolve it through the PC first every time? I've tried reordering the connections in the network settings but that made no difference.

  Read the article

• hosting environment for delivering FLVs

  - by Gotys

  What would be the ideal hardware setup for pushing lots of bandwith on a tube site? We have ever-expanding cloud storage where users upload the movies, then we have these web-delivery machines which cache the FLV files on its local harddrives and deliver them to users. Each cache machine can deliver 1200 mbits/s , if it has SAS 8 harddrives. Such a cache machine costs us $550/month for 8x160gb -- so each machine can cache only 160GB at any given time. If we want to cache more then 160gb , we need to add another machine..another $550/month..etc. This is very un-economical so I am wondering if we have any experts here who can figure out a better setup. I've been looking into "gluster FS", but I am not sure if this thing can push a lot of bandwith. Any ideas highly appreciated. Thank you!

  Read the article

• How do i setup a Window server 2008 R2 + SQL server 2008 VPS ?

  - by Spencer Lim

  I wish to deploy a trusted apps at the secured way... i got one empty VPS (no operating system) but i don't know how could i install Window server 2008 R2 and SQL server 2008 the version i got is genuine enterprise/ datacenter and sql enterprise the main purpose is used to deploy ASP.Net v4 MVC 2 and XBAP Apps + LINQ also use SQL server for my window application with someway to make it able to remote access May i know anyone here could teach me or introduce some source for me on how to setup the domain, IP, OS and feature all thing, please... i felt confuse here @.@

  Read the article

• Google.com always forward me to google.com.hk

  - by Ta Coen

  Any one could help me to figure out why Google.com always forward me to google.com.hk? $ dig google.com www.google.com. 509426 IN CNAME www.l.google.com. www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.147 www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.99 www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.105 www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.106 www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.104 www.l.google.com. 100 IN A 74.125.71.103 and $ dig google.com.hk www.google.com.hk. 261572 IN CNAME www.google.com. www.google.com. 589217 IN CNAME www.l.google.com. www.l.google.com. 139 IN A 74.125.235.17 www.l.google.com. 139 IN A 74.125.235.18 www.l.google.com. 139 IN A 74.125.235.19 www.l.google.com. 139 IN A 74.125.235.20 www.l.google.com. 139 IN A 74.125.235.16 How to make my network always goes to google.com?

  Read the article

• Visualizing DNS named query logs

  - by romant

  Anyone out has suggestions as to what is available for visualizing logs produced by named?

  Read the article

• Magento hosting on a budget

  - by spa

  I have to do a setup for Magento. My constraint is primarily ease of setup and fault tolerance/fail over. Furthermore costs are an issue. I have three identical physical servers to get the job done. Each server node has an i7 quad core, 16GB RAM, and 2x3TB HD in a software RAID 1 configuration. Each node runs Ubuntu 12.04. right now. I have an additional IP address which can be routed to any of these nodes. The Magento shop has max. 1000 products, 50% of it are bundle products. I would estimate that max. 100 users are active at once. This leads me to the conclusion, that performance is not top priority here. My first setup idea One node (lb) runs nginx as a load balancer. The additional IP is used with domain name and routed to this node by default. Nginx distributes the load equally to the other two nodes (shop1, shop2). Shop1 and shop2 are configured equally: each server runs Apache2 and MySQL. The Mysqls are configured with master/slave replication. My failover strategy: Lb fails = Route IP to shop1 (MySQL master), continue. Shop1 fails = Lb will handle that automatically, promote MySQL slave on shop2 to master, reconfigure Magento to use shop2 for writes, continue. Shop2 fails = Lb will handle that automatically, continue. Is this a sane strategy? Has anyone done a similar setup with Magento? My second setup idea Another way to do it would be to use drbd for storing the MySQL data files on shop1 and shop2. I understand that in this scenario only one node/MySQL instance can be active and the other is used as hot standby. So in case shop1 fails, I would start up MySQL on shop2, route the IP to shop2, and continue. I like that as the MySQL setup is easier and the nodes can be configured 99% identical. So in this case the load balancer becomes useless and I have a spare server. My third setup idea The third way might be master-master replication of MySQL databases. However, in my optinion this might be tricky, as Magento isn't build for this scenario (e.g. conflicting ids for new rows). I would not do that until I have heard of a working example. Could you give me an advice which route to follow? There seems not one "good" way to do it. E.g. I read blog posts which describe a MySQL master/slave setup for Magento, but elsewhere I read, that data might get duplicated when the slave lags behind the master (e.g. when an order is placed, a customer might get created twice). I'm kind of lost here.

  Read the article

• Unable to do forwarding in BIND DNS?

  - by preethika

  I have BIND working on Windows Server 2003. i want to forward my queries to another server. Recursion is working but forwarding is not working. can u guide me to set it. i've given the following in the options: options { directory "c:\named\zones"; allow-transfer { none; }; forward only; forwarders { 8.8.8.8 ; }; recursion no; }; is the format for forwarding correct in the above. if not what is the format. Am i to give any port number in the forwarders line? Does forwarding have any particular port number? Thank You in advance....

  Read the article

• Implementation of SSL on SaaS App with seprate domains

  - by asifch

  Hi, We are developing a SaaS application in Asp.net, where we have used the Single application and Per Tenant Database. The application is more like a Saas e-commerce where SSL and data separation are required features. Now we want that every Tenant can have his separate top level domain names instead of the second level domains like 37Signals. So all the domains abc.com and xyz.com are using the same single app. What i need to know is how to implement and deploy the https in the application so that everything works out fine, also how should we configure the NameServer and web application on IIS so that all the domains are pointing to the one application.

  Read the article

• Nameservers Won't Work

  - by user39110

  Hi, i have dedicated server and i use vendabilisim.com for nameserver. i have 2 nameservers ns1.vendabilisim.com 213.128.64.91 and ns2.vendabilisim.com 213.128.64.92 ip addresses are working but nameservers don't. Please help.

  Read the article

• dnssec zonesigner ignoring out-of-zone data

  - by jordi12100

  I am trying to configure DNSSec with BIND9 on CentOS 6.4 running DirectAdmin control panel. I am using this tutorial to make it work: https://www.dnssec-tools.org/wiki/index.php/Zonesigner But I can't get it work... When I run this command: zonesigner --genkeys jordikroon.nl.db jordikroon.nl.db.signed I get this error: jordikroon.nl.db:17: ignoring out-of-zone data (jordikroon.nl) jordikroon.nl.db:18: ignoring out-of-zone data (jordikroon.nl) jordikroon.nl.db:22: ignoring out-of-zone data (jordikroon.nl) jordikroon.nl.db:29: ignoring out-of-zone data (jordikroon.nl) jordikroon.nl.db:33: ignoring out-of-zone data (jordikroon.nl) zone jordikroon.nl.db/IN: has no NS records zone jordikroon.nl.db/IN: not loaded due to errors. I can't find anything on the web about this error. This is my zone db file: $TTL 14400 @ IN SOA ns1.ghservers.org. hostmaster.jordikroon.nl. ( 2013090703 14400 3600 1209600 86400 ) jordikroon.nl. 14400 IN NS ns1.ghservers.org. jordikroon.nl. 14400 IN NS ns2.ghservers.org. cp 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 ftp 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 jordikroon.nl. 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 localhost 14400 IN A 127.0.0.1 mail 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 pop 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 smtp 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 www 14400 IN A 85.17.32.228 jordikroon.nl. 14400 IN MX 10 mail jordikroon.nl. 14400 IN TXT "v=spf1 a mx ip4:85.17.32.228 ~all" localhost 14400 IN AAAA ::1 How do I have to fix this? All IN keywords are being ignored. Any help is welcome:-)

  Read the article

• IIS7 binding to subdomain causing authentication errors (TFS 2010)

  - by Tommy Jakobsen

  I'm trying to bind a IIS web site (Team Foundation Services 2010) to a subdomain, which is causing authentication errors. First I'll explain what I've done to set it up. This is the fist time I do this, so please correct me if I'm wrong. The web server is a stand-alone Windows Server 2008 R2 x64, running IIS7 with .NET Framework 4. I have the following A-records, pointing to my server: server.mydomain.com *.server.mydomain.com So all subdomains of server.mydomain.com points to the server. In IIS7 I have a web site (TFS 2010) on port 8080, with a virtual directory (named tfs) that is using Windows Authentication. I have one binding on the web site pointing to all unassigned IP addresses, port 8080 and having a host name of tfs.server.mydomain.com. Now, shouldn't I be able to access the virtual directory through: http://tfs.server.mydomain.com/tfs That is not working. However, I can access it through: http://tfs.server.mydomain.com:8080/tfs But, it won't let me authenticate using a Windows account (Server\Username). A windows account that I can authenticate with, when accessing the site through http://localhost:8080/tfs. What am I missing here?

  Read the article

• Properly Hosting Multiple Sites on VDS

  - by Aristotle

  I'm going to be moving about 7-10 websites (5-8 with Databases - MySQL) onto our new Virtual Private Server. I'm curious what the best way to host many sites on a single server is though. Do I create a directory for each site immediately within my root directory, and then point the domain names for each site to http://123.123.123.123/siteDirectory - or is there a more appropriate way to do this? I'm very interested in maintining control over how many concurent connections each site can have at any given time - would I be able to do that on the directory-level, or am I required to limit the concurrent-connections to the VPS itself?

  Read the article

• Testing Tomcat with Virtual Hosts

  - by Marty Pitt

  I'm trying to test Tomcat virtual hosts on my dev machine (windows 7/Tomcat 6). I'd like to have requests for localhost, test1.localhost and test2.localhost all route through to the same tomcat instance. I've edited my hosts file to look as follows: 127.0.0.1 localhost ::1 localhost 127.0.0.1 test1.localhost 127.0.0.1 test2.localhost And added modified the Engine in server.xml as follows: <Engine defaultHost="localhost" name="Catalina"> <Realm className="org.apache.catalina.realm.UserDatabaseRealm" resourceName="UserDatabase" /> <Host appBase="webapps" autoDeploy="true" name="localhost" unpackWARs="true" xmlNamespaceAware="false" xmlValidation="false"> <Alias>test1.localhost</Alias> <Alias>test2.localhost</Alias> </Host> </Engine> However, I'm getting a 404 when hitting test1.localhost:8080/myWebApp, although localhost:8080/myWebApp works fine. I can ping test1.localhost fine. What have I missed?

  Read the article

• MX Record for SubDomains

  - by Steve Sloka

  I want to be able to send email to any subdomain I like and not have to configure A records and MX records for each subdomain. Ideally I could send an email to [email protected] and [email protected] and not have to configure anything other than my original domain.com. My current setup: I have a domain (domain.com) and want to have multiple subdomains. (a.domain.com, b.domain.com, c.domain.com, etc). I have an MX record setup to point to domain.com and all email works fine for that domain. I have NOT setup A records for all the subdomains (and really don't want to).

  Read the article

• What is the general process of web hosting?

  - by ggfan

  I want to upload my site public so people can use it. I am currently using a free PHP webhosting company that supports up to a certian amount. When sites that say they offer unlimited upload, data, etc for like $10/month, is that all you need to run a big site? Or how do I host a big site, if it gets popular?

  Read the article

• CNAME and A record have different TTLs. Which one will be cached?

  - by Sean

  If a CNAME has a TTL of 1 hour that points to an A record with a TTL of 1 minute, will someone who looks up this CNAME have the entire result cached for 1 hour, or will it will keep having to lookup the A record every 1 minute?

  Read the article

• Vista WHS Client stopped resolving local names

  - by andrewcr

  I’m running Windows Home Server PP2 in my home, with 3 client computers: two XP and one Vista. I have a router that provides my local DHCP and the server has a static IP address. The other day the Vista machine hung, and on reboot stopped resolving local names. It will show the green home server client icon in the system tray, but if I attempt to log in to the console, I get a “This computer cannot connect to your home server” message. If I ping the server name from the command line, it does not resolve, and gives a “could not find host” message. Oddly enough, if I browse the network, I can see the server, but double clicking on it fails. The other machines on the local network have no problems seeing the server, and the Vista machine has no problems resolving names from the internet, it just can’t see any local machines. I’m aware that I can work around this by adding entries to my HOSTS file (it does work), but I’d like this to work the way it’s “supposed” to. I’m an experienced computer user and developer, but not a networking whiz. Can anyone tell me how local name resolution is supposed to work in my environment and/or suggest ways to troubleshoot this? Thanks, Andy

  Read the article

• Is there an easy-to-use tool that will make CNAME entries for me?

  - by Nathan Lawrence

  I don't understand how to use them and am trying to figure it out. Is there a wizard or something that can do it for me?

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124  | Next Page >