Search Results

Search found 8397 results on 336 pages for 'implementation'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 12/336 | < Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >

  • Efficient implementation of natural logarithm (ln) and exponentiation

    - by Donotalo
    Basically, I'm looking for implementation of log() and exp() functions provided in C library <math.h>. I'm working with 8 bit microcontrollers (OKI 411 and 431). I need to calculate Mean Kinetic Temperature. The requirement is that we should be able to calculate MKT as fast as possible and with as little code memory as possible. The compiler comes with log() and exp() functions in <math.h>. But calling either function and linking with the library causes the code size to increase by 5 Kilobytes, which will not fit in one of the micro we work with (OKI 411), because our code already consumed ~12K of available ~15K code memory. The implementation I'm looking for should not use any other C library functions (like pow(), sqrt() etc). This is because all library functions are packed in one library and even if one function is called, the linker will bring whole 5K library to code memory.

    Read the article

  • Thread-safe blocking queue implementation on .NET

    - by Shrike
    Hello. I'm looking for an implementation of thread-safe blocking queue for .NET. By "thread-safe blocking queue" I mean: - thread-safe access to a queue where Dequeue method call blocks a thread untill other thread puts (Enqueue) some value. By the moment I'v found this one: http://www.eggheadcafe.com/articles/20060414.asp (But it's for .NET 1.1). Could someone comment/criticize correctness of this implementation. Or suggest some another one. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Interface with inner implementation - good or bad

    - by dermoritz
    I am working on a project with many someInterface - someInterfaceImpl-pairs. Some days ago I got the idea (probably inspired by reading some objective c code) to include the default implementations as an inner class. Now some colleagues (all with much more java experience than me) saw this idea - feedback was between shocked and surprised ("this is working?"). I googled around a bit but didn't find much evidence of usefulness of this "pattern" (personal i like it): pdf-paper and a faq about code style What do you think - especially in those cases where an "default" implementation is tightly coupled to an interface. Update i just found this: Java Interface-Implementation Pair (see accepted answer)

    Read the article

  • Looking for an array (vs linked list) hashtable implementation in C

    - by kingusiu
    hi, I'm looking for a hashtable implementation in C that stores its objects in (twodimensional) arrays rather than linked lists. i.e. if a collision happens, the object that is causing the collision will be stored in the next free row index rather than pushed to the head and first element of a linked list. plus, the objects themselves must be copied to the hashtable, rather than referenced by pointers. (the objects do not live for the whole lifetime of the program but the table does). I know that such an implementation might have serious efficiency drawbacks and is not the "standard way of hashing" but as I work on a very special system-architecture i need those characteristics. thanks

    Read the article

  • WPF/Silverlight DataBinding to interface property (with hidden implementation)

    - by Dave
    I have the following (C#) code namespace A { interface IX { bool Prop { get; set; } } class X : IX { public bool Prop { ... } } // hidden implementation of IX } namespace B { .. A.IX x = ...; object.DataContext = x; object.SetBinding(SomeDependencyProperty, new Binding("Prop")); .. } So I have a hidden implementation of an interface with a property "Prop" and I need to bind to this property in code. My problem is that the binding isn't working unless I make class X public. Is there any way around this problem?

    Read the article

  • How to Implement an Interface that Requires Duplicate Member Names?

    - by Will Marcouiller
    I often have to implement some interfaces such as IEnumerable<T> in my code. Each time, when implementing automatically, I encounter the following: public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() { // Code here... } public IEnumerator GetEnumerator1() { // Code here... } Though I have to implement both GetEnumerator() methods, they impossibly can have the same name, even if we understand that they do the same, somehow. The compiler can't treat them as one being the overload of the other, because only the return type differs. When doing so, I manage to set the GetEnumerator1() accessor to private. This way, the compiler doesn't complaint about not implementing the interface member, and I simply throw a NotImplementedException within the method's body. However, I wonder whether it is a good practice, or if I shall proceed differently, as perhaps a method alias or something like so. What is the best approach while implementing an interface such as IEnumerable<T> that requires the implementation of two different methods with the same name? EDIT #1 Does VB.NET reacts differently from C# while implementing interfaces, since in VB.NET it is explicitly implemented, thus forcing the GetEnumerator1(). Here's the code: Public Function GetEnumerator() As System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator(Of T) Implements System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable(Of T).GetEnumerator // Code here... End Function Public Function GetEnumerator1() As System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerator Implements System.Collections.Generic.IEnumerable.GetEnumerator // Code here... End Function Both GetEnumerator() methods are explicitly implemented, and the compile will refuse them to have the same name. Why?

    Read the article

  • How to Implement an Interface that Requires Duplicate Member Names in C#?

    - by Will Marcouiller
    I often have to implement some interfaces such as IEnumerable<T> in my code. Each time, when implementing automatically, I encounter the following: public IEnumerator<T> GetEnumerator() { // Code here... } public IEnumerator GetEnumerator1() { // Code here... } Though I have to implement both GetEnumerator() methods, they impossibly can have the same name, even if we understand that they do the same, somehow. The compiler can't treat them as one being the overload of the other, because only the return type differs. When doing so, I manage to set the GetEnumerator1() accessor to private. This way, the compiler doesn't complaint about not implementing the interface member, and I simply throw a NotImplementedException within the methods body. However, I wonder whether it is a good practice, or if I shall proceed differently, as perhaps a method alias or something like so. What is the best approach while implementing an interface such as IEnumerable<T> that requires the implementation of two different methods with the same name?

    Read the article

  • Can you explain this generics behavior and if I have a workaround?

    - by insta
    Sample program below: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; namespace GenericsTest { class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { IRetrievable<int, User> repo = new FakeRepository(); Console.WriteLine(repo.Retrieve(35)); } } class User { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } } class FakeRepository : BaseRepository<User>, ICreatable<User>, IDeletable<User>, IRetrievable<int, User> { // why do I have to implement this here, instead of letting the // TKey generics implementation in the baseclass handle it? //public User Retrieve(int input) //{ // throw new NotImplementedException(); //} } class BaseRepository<TPoco> where TPoco : class,new() { public virtual TPoco Create() { return new TPoco(); } public virtual bool Delete(TPoco item) { return true; } public virtual TPoco Retrieve<TKey>(TKey input) { return null; } } interface ICreatable<TPoco> { TPoco Create(); } interface IDeletable<TPoco> { bool Delete(TPoco item); } interface IRetrievable<TKey, TPoco> { TPoco Retrieve(TKey input); } } This sample program represents the interfaces my actual program uses, and demonstrates the problem I'm having (commented out in FakeRepository). I would like for this method call to be generically handled by the base class (which in my real example is able to handle 95% of the cases given to it), allowing for overrides in the child classes by specifying the type of TKey explicitly. It doesn't seem to matter what parameter constraints I use for the IRetrievable, I can never get the method call to fall through to the base class. Also, if anyone can see an alternate way to implement this kind of behavior and get the result I'm ultimately looking for, I would be very interested to see it. Thoughts?

    Read the article

  • implementation of you tube api using Gdata objective-c client

    - by Samrudh
    Currently,I am developing an app in which i implement You Tube API for uploading videos to you tube from app. I implement API using Gdata objective-c client example youtubetest.xcodeproj. but when i upload video i am getting following error: Error Domain=com.goggle.GdataServiceeDomain code=400 "The Operation couldn't" completed.(GData error invalidRequestUri:"invalid request URL")" I try to solve this issue but can't succeeded.How can i solve this? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • iSCSI SAN Implementation with several ESXi hosts and two Equallogic SANs

    - by Sergey
    I work for a small state college. We currently have 4 ESXi hosts (all made by Dell), 2 EqualLogic SANs (PS4000 and PS4100) and a bunch of old HP Procurve switches. The current setup is very far from being redundant and fast so we want to improve it. I read several threads but get even more confused. The Procurve Switches are 2824. I know they don't support Jumbo Frames and Flow Control at the same time, but we have plans to upgrade to something like Procurve 3500yl. Any suggestions? I heard Dell Powerconnects 6xxx are pretty good but I'm not sure how they compare to HPs. There will be a 4-port Etherchannel (Link Aggregation) between the switches, and all control modules on SAN will be connected to different switches. Is there anything that will make the setup better? Are there better switches then Procurves 3500yl that cost less than 5k? What kind of bandwidth can I expect between ESXi hosts (they will also be connected to 2824 with multiple cables) and SANs?

    Read the article

  • Bug in CDP implementation

    - by Suraj
    We are developing a Linux based ethernet switch which has 6 ports. We are done with CDP protocol. I have connected a Cisco device to port 2. When I quiery for the Cisco device, I get the reply and instead of getting lan1 (port 1 - lan0 .. port 6 = lan5), I always get the interface name as eth0. The same is the case for all the ports. What changes are required to get the correct interface name? I will be very thankful for the information. The snap packet is received in the routine snap_rcv() in the file "linux._2.6.XX/net/802/psnap.c"; Regards, Suraj..

    Read the article

  • Implementation of SSL on SaaS App with seprate domains

    - by asifch
    Hi, We are developing a SaaS application in Asp.net, where we have used the Single application and Per Tenant Database. The application is more like a Saas e-commerce where SSL and data separation are required features. Now we want that every Tenant can have his separate top level domain names instead of the second level domains like 37Signals. So all the domains abc.com and xyz.com are using the same single app. What i need to know is how to implement and deploy the https in the application so that everything works out fine, also how should we configure the NameServer and web application on IIS so that all the domains are pointing to the one application.

    Read the article

  • iPhone jail break implementation

    - by Marcus
    I've read to jailbreak your iPhone, you download custom firmware to your iPhone. Is this "firmware" a full operating system? Are you replacing the OS that Apple included on the phone with a custom version that doesn't have some of Apple's restrictions?

    Read the article

  • tcp msl timeout implementation in linux

    - by iamrohitbanga
    The following is given in the book TCP IP Illustrated by Stevens Quiet Time Concept The 2MSL wait provides protection against delayed segments from an earlier incarnation of a connection from being interpreted as part of a new connection that uses the same local and foreign IP addresses and port numbers. But this works only if a host with connections in the 2MSL wait does not crash. What if a host with ports in the 2MSL wait crashes, reboots within MSL seconds, and immediately establishes new connections using the same local and foreign IP addresses and port numbers corresponding to the local ports that were in the 2MSL wait before the crash? In this scenario, delayed segments from the connections that existed before the crash can be misinterpreted as belonging to the new connections created after the reboot. This can happen regardless of how the initial sequence number is chosen after the reboot. To protect against this scenario, RFC 793 states that TCP should not create any connections for MSL seconds after rebooting. This is called the quiet time Few implementations abide by this since most hosts take longer than MSL seconds to reboot after a crash. Do operating systems wait for 2MSL seconds now after a reboot before initiating a TCP connection. The boot times are also less these days. Although the ports and sequence numbers are random but is this wait implemented in Linux? Also RFC 793 says that this wait is not required if history is maintained. Does linux maintain any history of used sequence numbers for connections to handle this case?

    Read the article

  • OSError : [Errno 38] Function not implemented - Django Celery implementation

    - by Jordan Messina
    I installed django-celery and I tried to start up the worker server but I get an OSError that a function isn't implemented. I'm running CentOS release 5.4 (Final) on a VPS: . broker -> amqp://guest@localhost:5672/ . queues -> . celery -> exchange:celery (direct) binding:celery . concurrency -> 4 . loader -> djcelery.loaders.DjangoLoader . logfile -> [stderr]@WARNING . events -> OFF . beat -> OFF [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] Traceback (most recent call last): [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] File "manage.py", line 11, in <module> [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] execute_manager(settings) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 438, in execute_manager [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] utility.execute() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,364: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/__init__.py", line 379, in execute [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] self.fetch_command(subcommand).run_from_argv(self.argv) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 191, in run_from_argv [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] self.execute(*args, **options.__dict__) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django/core/management/base.py", line 218, in execute [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] output = self.handle(*args, **options) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,365: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/django_celery-2.0.0-py2.6.egg/djcelery/management/commands/celeryd.py", line 22, in handle [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] run_worker(**options) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/bin/celeryd.py", line 385, in run_worker [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] return Worker(**options).run() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/bin/celeryd.py", line 218, in run [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] self.run_worker() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,366: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/bin/celeryd.py", line 312, in run_worker [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] worker.start() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/worker/__init__.py", line 206, in start [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] component.start() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/concurrency/processes/__init__.py", line 54, in start [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] maxtasksperchild=self.maxtasksperchild) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,367: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/concurrency/processes/pool.py", line 448, in __init__ [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] self._setup_queues() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/site-packages/celery-2.0.1-py2.6.egg/celery/concurrency/processes/pool.py", line 564, in _setup_queues [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] self._inqueue = SimpleQueue() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/queues.py", line 315, in __init__ [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] self._rlock = Lock() [2010-07-22 17:10:01,368: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 117, in __init__ [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] SemLock.__init__(self, SEMAPHORE, 1, 1) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] File "/usr/local/lib/python2.6/multiprocessing/synchronize.py", line 49, in __init__ [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] sl = self._semlock = _multiprocessing.SemLock(kind, value, maxvalue) [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] OSError [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] : [2010-07-22 17:10:01,369: WARNING/MainProcess] [Errno 38] Function not implemented Am I just totally screwed and should use a new kernel that has this implemented or is there an easy way to resolve this?

    Read the article

  • Linux software RAID 10 implementation

    - by fabrik
    Hello there! I don't want to force anybody to make it on behalf of me but trust me: i've looked hundreds of sites and i can't find a good starting point for this. I have 4x500Gb HDD's which i want to set up in RAID 10. The most promising description is here, but it's a little old and unclear for me, above all i prefer Debian over Ubuntu (i know there are slight or no differences). Is it possible to build RAID 10 with Debian's installer or i need to build RAID 1 first in the installer then use mdadm later? What is the best practice for building software RAID 10 under Linux (Debian)? Thanks for your time, fabrik

    Read the article

  • Can someone correct me about Windows 2008 DFS implementation

    - by cwheeler33
    I have 2 two Windows 2003 file servers using DoubleTake at the moment. They are in an 2003 AD domain. And each server has it's own disk set. It is time to replace the servers... I want to use Windows 2008 64bit Ent. I was thinking of using DFS-R to replace DoubleTake. The part I'm not sure about is clustering. Do I need to have shared storage if each server has a copy of the data? I want to have the data available to the same share name, so maybe I don't fully understand how DFS is set up. I currently have about 6TB of data. I expect to grow by 3TB a year on these file servers. Any resources/books that could teach me would be good to know as well.

    Read the article

  • Help with proposed iSCSI SAN VMware implementation.

    - by obsidian
    We have four (with plans to grow to four more) Dell servers with 6 NICs. They are running VMware ESXi 4.1. We would like to connect all of them to an Openfiler iSCSI SAN via HP ProCurve 1810G switches. Based on the design below, is there anything I should be concerned about or anything unusual that I should look out for when making the iSCSI network configurations on the servers, switches and OpenFiler? Should I bond the connections on the servers or simply setup them up for failover? The primary goal is to maximize IOPS. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • SMTP Client implementation [on hold]

    - by orif
    I'm implementing SMTP client. What should the client do once it already sent the "." at the end of the mail, but didn't receive "250 Ok"? This is how the conversation between the client and server look like: Server Response: 220 www.sample.com ESMTP Postfix Client Sending : HELO domain.com Server Response: 250 Hello domain.com Client Sending : MAIL FROM: <[email protected]> Server Response: 250 Ok Client Sending : RCPT TO: <[email protected]> Server Response: 250 Ok Client Sending : DATA Server Response: 354 End data with <CR><LF>.<CR><LF> Client Sending : Subject: Example Message Client Sending : From: [email protected] Client Sending : To: [email protected] Client Sending : Client Sending : TEST MAIL Client Sending : Client Sending : . Server Response: 250 Ok: queued as 23411 Client Sending : QUIT I'm not sure what should I do if the client sends "." and doesn't receive the 250 Ok - because of possible network error. Was the "." sent or not? Should the client resend the mail - and - maybe - duplicate the item, or not - and risk in losing an important mail item? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Database implementation question?

    - by gundam
    consider a disk with a sector size of 512 bytes, 2000 tracks/surface, 50 sectors/track, 5 doubled sided platters, average seek time is 10 msec. Assume a block size of 1024-byte is selected. Assume a file that contains 100,000 records of 100-byte each is to be stored on the disk, and NONE of the reocd can be spanned 2 blocks. How many blocks are needed to store the entire file?? If the file is arranged sequentially on disk, how many surfaces are required?? Now, i have calculated that 10,000 blocks are needed to store 100,000 records. But i am not sure how to find out the answer of the surfaces required. I only calculated the capacity of track is 25KB and capacity of surface is 50,000 KB But I don't know how to calculate the number of surfaces... Could anyone help me how to get the answer? Thanks a lot!!

    Read the article

  • Database implementation question? [closed]

    - by gundam
    consider a disk with a sector size of 512 bytes, 2000 tracks/surface, 50 sectors/track, 5 doubled sided platters, average seek time is 10 msec. Assume a block size of 1024-byte is selected. Assume a file that contains 100,000 records of 100-byte each is to be stored on the disk, and NONE of the reocd can be spanned 2 blocks. How many blocks are needed to store the entire file?? If the file is arranged sequentially on disk, how many surfaces are required?? Now, i have calculated that 10,000 blocks are needed to store 100,000 records. But i am not sure how to find out the answer of the surfaces required. I only calculated the capacity of track is 25KB and capacity of surface is 50,000 KB But I don't know how to calculate the number of surfaces... Could anyone help me how to get the answer? Thanks a lot!!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19  | Next Page >