Search Results

Search found 37882 results on 1516 pages for 'function overloading'.

Page 123/1516 | < Previous Page | 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130  | Next Page >

  • If element has been 'mouseover'ed for 500ms, run function with jQuery

    - by PaulAdamDavis
    For the sanity of my users, I want a 'mouseover' event to run after the selector has been hovered for half a second rather than as soon as they hover it. I first tried a setTimeout function but that runs however long the element has been hovered, I didn't think it through too much I guess. I've also spent a day (on and off) searching (and playing Pacman) ti no result, unless I'm searching for the wrong things. I would like to keep this plugin-less if we can, purely for run speed & maintainability. $("#mySelector").mouseover(function(){ // Run after 500ms $(this).addClass("hasBeen500ms"); }); Let's see if we can crack this, I know it will have so many applications!

    Read the article

  • Calling C++ function from C.

    - by claws
    I know this. Calling C function from C++: If my application was in C++ and I had to call functions from a library written in C. Then I would have used //main.cpp extern "C" void C_library_function(int x, int y);//prototype C_library_function(2,4);// directly using it. This wouldn't mangle the name C_library_function and linker would find the same name in its input *.lib files and problem is solved. Calling C++ function from C??? But here I'm extending a large application which is written in C and I need to use a library which is written in C++. Name mangling of C++ is causing trouble here. Well I cannot use C++ compiler over my C project because thats breaking lot of other stuff. What is the way out? By the way I'm using MSVC

    Read the article

  • Why I have to redeclare a virtual function while overriding [C++]

    - by Neeraj
    #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Duck { public: virtual void quack() = 0; }; class BigDuck : public Duck { public: // void quack(); (uncommenting will make it compile) }; void BigDuck::quack(){ cout << "BigDuckDuck::Quack\n"; } int main() { BigDuck b; Duck *d = &b; d->quack(); } Consider this code, the code doesn't compiles. However when I declare the virtual function in the subclass, then it compiles fine. The compiler already has the signature of the function which the subclass will override, then why a redeclaration is required? Any insights.

    Read the article

  • How to create "lock" (stop updating of cells) in Excel?

    - by Oozi
    My question is pretty simple, but one to which I can't really find a solution myself. I use Excel quite frequently, but rarely the fancy stuff. Anyway, to the point: How do I create a dropmenu that will lock certain cells, rows or columns? (by lock I mean unable to change via hand and stops updating itself). Example: A1 = 5 B1 = A1 * 100 Can I "lock" the B1-cell, so that changing A1 will have no effect on B1 (Will remain at value 500)? I would preferably want to be able to "unlock" the cell as well, instead of simply making function into value. Is this possible? Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Anonymous functions IE issue/problem in Javascript

    - by Bragaadeesh
    Hi guys, I am having a javascript written like this. imageDiv.onclick = function(){xyz.deleteImage(param1, param2);return false;}; Now things are fine in Firefox, Chrome and Safari. But I have a strange issue in Internet Explorer. What happens is, when I click on the imageDiv in my page, the deleteImage() method is getting invoked twice. One being the actual deleteimage() method thats given here and another is the deleteimage() method that I have in the page. How to resolve this issue. Please help.

    Read the article

  • Cannot read function written in baseform

    - by Nana
    I have a program (aspx page) which inherits the baseform. My baseform has a function which validates a session. But currently, the program runs to the page and it didnt go through the baseform and read the function. I dont know where i go wrong. no error pop out. I build the page, still no error. Below is the code which i call the baseform. public partial class TAView : BaseForm { protected override void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (Page.IsPostBack == false) { base.Page_Load(sender,e); binddropdownlists(); } }

    Read the article

  • jquery: animate function problem

    - by Syom
    i start learning jquery just yesterday. i have a div element with some content, and i want to hide it by changing it's height: here is the script <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ $("#hide").click(function(){ $("#cont").animate({ height: '0' },1500); $("#cont").hide(); }); }); </script> <input type="button" value="hide" id="hide"> <div id="cont"> text here... </div> but it doesn't work, becouse it automaticaly sets display:block to #cont element, so after animation it starts to show. when i try to set display:none to #cont element, it doesn't happen. could you help me? thanks

    Read the article

  • Passing dynamic parameter to a JavaScript function using innerHTML

    - by user958263
    I am having issues passing a dynamic parameter to a JavaScript function using innerHTML. Included below is the current code that I am using: var name = "test"; frm.innerHtml = '<button name="close" id="close" title="Cancel" type="button" onclick="closeTab('+name+');">Return</button>'; When I debug the code of the CloseTab() function, the parameter specified by the name variable is null. I believe there is a problem with the declaration of the value while modifying the innerHTML property. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Calling a function when using <button> tag with jQuery Mobile

    - by u2sonderzug
    I already asked a similar question for buttons in tags, but I find that solution doesn't work using tags. So, if I am using a script that references jQuery Mobile I have the following line: <button id="buttonAnswer1" data-inline="true">Click me</button> How would I add a listener for when this button is clicked and lets say call the hello() function? i.e. <button id="buttonAnswer1" data-inline="true">Click me</button> <script> function hello(){ console.log("hello world"); } </script>

    Read the article

  • Improve C function performance with cache locality?

    - by Christoper Hans
    I have to find a diagonal difference in a matrix represented as 2d array and the function prototype is int diagonal_diff(int x[512][512]) I have to use a 2d array, and the data is 512x512. This is tested on a SPARC machine: my current timing is 6ms but I need to be under 2ms. Sample data: [3][4][5][9] [2][8][9][4] [6][9][7][3] [5][8][8][2] The difference is: |4-2| + |5-6| + |9-5| + |9-9| + |4-8| + |3-8| = 2 + 1 + 4 + 0 + 4 + 5 = 16 In order to do that, I use the following algorithm: int i,j,result=0; for(i=0; i<4; i++) for(j=0; j<4; j++) result+=abs(array[i][j]-[j][i]); return result; But this algorithm keeps accessing the column, row, column, row, etc which make inefficient use of cache. Is there a way to improve my function?

    Read the article

  • CouchDB: How to change view function via javascript?

    - by osti
    Hello Guys, I am playing around with CouchDB to test if it is "possible" [1] to store scientific data (simulated and experimental raw data + metadata). A big pro is the schema-less approach of CouchDB: we have to be very flexible with the metadata, as the set of parameters changes very often. Up to now I have some code to feed raw data, plots (both as attachments), and hierarchical metadata (as JSON) into CouchDB documents, and have written some prototype Javascript for filtering and showing. But the filtering is done on the client side (a.k.a. browser): The map function simply returns everything. How could I change the (or push a second) map function of a specific _design-document with simple browser-JS? I do not think that a temporary view would yield any performance gain... Thanks for your time and answers. [1]: of course it is possible, but is it also useful? feasible? reasonable?

    Read the article

  • comlen function in Java

    - by davit-datuashvili
    in c or c++ the function comlen is defined such int comlen(char *p,char *q){ int i=0; while *p && (*p++==*q++) i++; return i; } Is this code equivalent of this function? int comlen(String s,String m){ int i=0; while (i<s.length() && s.charAt(i)==m.charAt(i)){ i++; } return i; }

    Read the article

  • 7 - drupal overriding theme fucntions gettting notices

    - by welovedesign
    So I am overriding a theme function by putting the contents in my template.php module, the problem is that it it throwing up loads of undefined index notices because there are lots of functions that are defined in the module. How can I define these in the template.php file and prevent the notices. Note: I know i can turn them off 'uc_cart_block_content' => array( 'variables' => array( 'help_text' => NULL, 'items' => NULL, 'item_count' => NULL, 'item_text' => NULL, 'total' => NULL, 'summary_links' => NULL, 'collapsed' => TRUE, ), 'file' => 'uc_cart.theme.inc', ),

    Read the article

  • C++ function call routes resolver

    - by Poni
    Hi! I'm looking for a tool that will tell/resolve for every function all the call paths (call it "routes") to it. For example: void deeper(int *pNumber) { *pNumber++; } void gateA(int *pNumber) { deeper(pNumber); } void gateB(int *pNumber) { gateA(pNumber); } void main() { int x = 123; gateA(&x); gateB(&x); } See? I need a tool that will tell me all the routes to deeper(), and more if possible. By saying "more" I mean that it will tell me if the pointer is the same as been provided to the calling function. This will greatly save me time. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Multifunctioning in Javascript

    - by Starx
    The concept is running multiple functions concurrently. The reason is, I have a page which performs various actions through ajax. These actions includes making multiple backups of new files uploaded in the upload directory. But I want this process to be initiated by a moderator. As this is a very lengthy process(might even take hours to complete), it blocks others ajax requests from executing, until this process complete. I want to execute functions along with the previously executed function parallelly. I am using jQuery's Ajax to sent initiate the request.

    Read the article

  • Call a function every hour

    - by user2961971
    I am trying to update information from a weather service on my page. The info should be updated every hour on the hour. How exactly do I go about calling a function on the hour every hour? I kind of had an idea but im not sure of how to actually refine it so it works... What I had in mind was something like creating an if statement, such as: (pseudo code) //get the mins of the current time var mins = datetime.mins(); if(mins == "00"){ function(); }

    Read the article

  • Converting a macro to an inline function

    - by Rob
    I am using some Qt code that adds a VERIFY macro that looks something like this: #define VERIFY(cond) \ { \ bool ok = cond; \ Q_ASSERT(ok); \ } The code can then use it whilst being certain the condition is actually evaluated, e.g.: Q_ASSERT(callSomeFunction()); // callSomeFunction not evaluated in release builds! VERIFY(callSomeFunction()); // callSomeFunction is always evaluated Disliking macros, I would instead like to turn this into an inline function: inline VERIFY(bool condition) { Q_ASSERT(condition); } However, in release builds I am worried that the compiler would optimise out all calls to this function (as Q_ASSERT wouldn't actually do anything.) I am I worrying unnecessarily or is this likely depending on the optimisation flags/compiler/etc.? I guess I could change it to: inline VERIFY(bool condition) { condition; Q_ASSERT(condition); } But, again, the compiler may be clever enough to ignore the call. Is this inline alternative safe for both debug and release builds?

    Read the article

  • Can typeid() be used to pass a function?

    - by Kerb_z
    I tried this and got the output as: void Please explain the following Code: #include <cstdio> #include <typeinfo> using namespace std ; void foo() { } int main(void) { printf("%s", typeid(foo()).name());// Please notice this line, is it same as typeid( ).name() ? return 0; } AFAIK: The typeid operator allows the type of an object to be determined at run time. So, does this sample code tell us that a function that returns void is of *type void*. I mean a function is a method and has no type. Correct?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130  | Next Page >