Search Results

Search found 6839 results on 274 pages for 'functional tests'.

Page 125/274 | < Previous Page | 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132  | Next Page >

  • How to allow Google Images search to by pass hotlink protection?

    - by Marco Demaio
    I saw Google Images seems to index my images only if hotlink protection is off. * I use anyway hotlink protection because I don't like the idea of people sucking my bandwidth, i simply this code to protcet my sites from being hotlinked: RewriteEngine on RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$ RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http(s)?://(www\.)?mydomain\.com/.*$ [NC] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http(s)?://(www\.)?mydomain\.com$ [NC] RewriteRule .*\.(jpg|jpeg|png|gif)$ - [F,NC,L] But in order to allow Google Image search to bypass my hotlink protection (I want Google Images search to show my images) would it suffice to add a line like this one: RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http(s)?://(www\.)?google\.com/.*$ [NC] RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http(s)?://(www\.)?google\.com$ [NC] Because I'm wondring: is the crawler crawling just from google.com? and what about google.it / google.co.uk, etc.? FYI: on Google official guidelines I did not find info about this. I suppose hotlink protection prevents Google Images to show images in its results because I did some tests and it seems hotlink protection does prevent my images to be shown in Google Images search.

    Read the article

  • WampServer 2.1.a est disponible, la plateforme de développement et de test d'applications Web met à jour ses outils

    WampServer 2.1.a est disponible La plateforme de développement et de tests d'applications Web est de retour Alter Way annonce la disponibilité de la nouvelle version de son outil WampServer. WampServer permet de développer et de tester des applications Web, dynamiques, en local sous Windows, à l'aide du serveur Apache, du langage de scripts PHP et d'une base de données MySQL. La plate-forme possède également PHPMyAdmin pour gérer plus facilement les bases de données. « Contrairement aux autres solutions, WampServer permet de reproduire fidèlement son serveur de production », se félicite l'éditeur. La version 2.1.a inclue ...

    Read the article

  • BDD in a .NET environment

    - by Nick
    I've seen BDD in action (in this case using SpecFlow and Selenium in a .NET environment) for a small test project. I was very impressed - mainly due to the fact that the language used to specify the acceptance tests meant they engaged with the product owner much more easily. I'm now keen to bring this into my current organisation. However I'm asked 'who else uses this?' and 'show me some case-studies'. Unfortunately I cannot find any 'big names' (or even 'small names' for that matter!) of companies who are actively using BDD. I have two questions really: Is BDD adopted by companies out there? Who are they? How can BDD be implemented in an agile .NET environment and are there any significant drawbacks to doing it?

    Read the article

  • What has the most efficient intersection test against an AABB tree - OBB, Cylinder or Capsule?

    - by identitycrisisuk
    I'm currently trying to find collisions in 3D between a tighter volume than an AABB and a tree of AABB volumes. I just need to know whether they are intersecting, no closest distance or collision response. An OBB, Cylinder or Capsule would all roughly fit these purposes but Cylinder and Capsule were the first thing I thought of, which I have found little information about detecting intersections online. Am I right in thinking that they would always be more complex to perform Separating Axis Tests on even though they might seem like simpler shapes? I figure by the time I get my head around SAT for curved shapes I could have done the thing with OBBs but I wanted to find out for sure.

    Read the article

  • Selenium-Nunit Program Structure

    - by Jacobm001
    My office has a suite of web reporting engines written in VB. All in all there's about 300 reports with varying displays depending on the data being input into them. I'm trying to establish an efficient way to deal with such a major diversity, but am struggling with creating a system that won't be a nightmare to code/maintain. What I've considered doing is: On program launch, read the steps required for each test page. This may have multiple tests for the same page with varying inputs. Write each iteration of the test in XML file under $env:temp/testname Use the TestCaseSource attribute of Nunit to funnel every related xml file as a source. My major stumbling block has been how to get that data to the Nunit framework. Is Nunit really appropriate for what I'm trying to do, or is it too static?

    Read the article

  • Test Doubles : Do they go in "source packages" or "test packages"?

    - by sbrattla
    I've got a couple of data access objects (DefaultPersonServices.class, DefaultAddressServices.class) which is responsible for various CRUD operations in a database. A few different classes use these services, but as the services requires that a connection is established with a database I can't really use them in unit tests as they take too long. Thus, I'd like to create a test doubles for them and simply do FakePersonServices.class and FakeAddressService.class implementations which I can use throughout testing. Now, this is all good (I assume)...but my question relates to where I put the test doubles. Should I keep them along with the default implementations (aka "real" implementations) or should I keep them in a corresponding test package. The default implementations are found in Source Packages : com.company.data.services. Should I keep the test doubles here too, or should the test doubles rather be in Test Packages : com.company.data.services?

    Read the article

  • Harmful temptations in programming

    - by gaearon
    Just curious, what kinds of temptations in programming turned out to be really harmful in your projects? Like when you really feel the urge to do something and you believe it's going to benefit the project or else you just trick yourself into believing it is, and after a week you realize you haven't solved any real problems but instead created new ones or, in the best case, pleased your inner beast with no visible impact. Personally, I find it very hard to not refactor bad code. I work with a lot of bad legacy code, and it takes some deep breaths to not touch it when I have no tests to prove my refactoring doesn't not break anything. Another demon for me in user interface, I can literally spend hours changing UI layout just because I enjoy doing it. Sometimes I tell myself I'm working on usability, but the truth is just I love moving buttons around. What are your programming demons, and how do you avoid them?

    Read the article

  • Verizon va lancer un réseau 4G : les autres opérateurs vont-ils devoir suivre ?

    Mise à jour du 09.03.2010 par Katleen Verizon atteint les 50Mbps avec son réseau 4G, en service à la fin de l'année Verizon vient d'annoncer que son réseau 4G LTE (Long Term Evolution) avait passé une série de tests à Boston et à Seattle (depuis août 2009), afin de définir ses performances. Ainsi, des pics de 5O Mb/s ont été atteints en téléchargement, même si dans le monde réel, les chiffres avoisineront les 5-12 Mbps pour le downlink et les 2-5 Mbps pour l'uplink. Diverses actions ont ainsi été testées et réalisées avec succès sur le réseau 4G : le streaming video, le transfert et le téléchargement de fichiers, la navigation en ligne, les appels par VoIP, etc. Le service devr...

    Read the article

  • Opera sort un émulateur de bureau pour tester les applications de son OS mobile, et séduire les créa

    Opera sort un émulateur de bureau pour tester les applications de son navigateur mobile, et tente de séduire les créateurs de widgets Opera vient de sortir une nouvelle application en lien avec son navigateur mobile. Cet outil est à destination des développeurs de widgets pour Opera Mobile et il devrait leur faciliter la vie. Il s'agit en fait d'un émulateur de bureau qui permettra aux créateurs de widgets de vérifier la progression de leur travail sur un écran Windows, Mac ou Linux. Ce type d'outil n'est pas un nouveauté en lui-même, mais il innove en permettant de soumettre l'application à une batterie de tests AVANT de la faire tourner sur un smartphone Symbian ou Windows Phone (les deux plateformes qui prennent ...

    Read the article

  • Single responsibility principle - am I overusing it?

    - by Tarun
    For reference - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_responsibility_principle I have a test scenario where in one module of application is responsible for creating ledger entries. There are three basic tasks which could be carried out - View existing ledger entries in table format. Create new ledger entry using create button. Click on a ledger entry in the table (mentioned in first pointer) and view its details in next page. You could nullify a ledger entry in this page. (There are couple more operation/validations in each page but fore sake of brevity I will limit it to these) So I decided to create three different classes - LedgerLandingPage CreateNewLedgerEntryPage ViewLedgerEntryPage These classes offer the services which could be carried out in those pages and Selenium tests use these classes to bring application to a state where I could make certain assertion. When I was having it reviewed with on of my colleague then he was over whelmed and asked me to make one single class for all. Though I yet feel my design is much clean I am doubtful if I am overusing Single Responsibility principle

    Read the article

  • Distributing a very simple application

    - by vanna
    I have a very simple working console application written in C++ linked with a light static library. It is just for testing purposes. Now that the coding part is done, I would like to know the process of actually distributing the program. I wrote a very basic CMakeLists.txt that create makefiles or VS projects to build the sources. I also have a program that calls the static library in order to make some google tests. To me, the distribution of this application goes like this : to developpers : the src directory with the CMakeLists.txt file (multi-platform distribution) with a README.txt and an INSTALL.txt to users : the executable and a README.txt on my git repo : everything mentionned above plus the sources for testing and the gtest external lib A this point : considering the complexity of my application, am I doing it right ? Is there any reference that would formalize this distribution process so I can get better and go further ? Say I would like to add dynamic libraries that can be updated, external libraries like boost : how should I package this to distribute it in a professionnal way ?

    Read the article

  • How to layer if statements when order of logic is irrelevant?

    - by jimmyjimmy
    Basically I have a series of logic in my website that can lead to 5 total outcomes. Basically two different if tests and then a catch all else statement. For example: if cond1: if mod1: #do things elif mod2: #do things elif cond2: if mod1: #do things elif mod2 #do things else: #do things I was thinking about rewriting it like this: if cond1 and mod1: #do things elif cond1 and mod2: #do things elif cond2 and mod1: #do things elif cond2 and mod2: #do things else: #do things Is there any real difference in these two coding options/a better choice for this kind of logic testing?

    Read the article

  • XHTML fix solution republished

    - by TATWORTH
    As a post VS2010 SP1 installation activity, I am recompiling all my open source projects. The first is XHTMLFIX at http://xhtmlfix.codeplex.com/ This LGPL project has simple fixes to ASP.NET 2.0/4.0 to achieve XHTML compliance as measured by the W3C tests at http://validator.w3.org/ The XHTML project shows as untrue the commonly held belief that MVP or MVC are necessary for producing XHTML compliant web pages. Incidentally the other supposed advantage of MVP and MVC over web forms of easier testing is also very dubious as web forms can be tested by systems such as Selenium or WaTiN. I have used NUnitASP (alas sadly discontinued) with web forms and found it be more effective than unit testing MVP. Now if you prefer the MVP and / or MVC approach over Web forms then fine, that is your preferance. Now if you can find an example where ASP.NET 4.0 Web forms properly written do not produce XHTML compliant markup, I would be glad of your example and will look at ways of modifying the markup to be XHTML compliant.

    Read the article

  • Unit testing a text index

    - by jplot
    Consider a text index such as a suffix tree or a suffix array supporting Count queries (number of occurrences of a pattern) and Locate queries (the positions of all the occurrences of a pattern) over a given text. How would you go about unit testing such a class ? What I have in mind is to generate a big random string then extract a random substring from this big string and compare the results of both queries with naive implementations (such as string::find). Another idea I have is to find the most frequent substring of length l appearing in the original string (using perhaps a naive method) and use these substrings for testing the index. This isn't the best way, so what would be a good design of the unit tests for a text index ? In case it matters, this is in C++ using google test.

    Read the article

  • Oracle Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) Developer Certification

    - by user33716
    I would like to gain the "Oracle Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB) Developer" certification. According to this page I have to take a number of classes each of which costs up to a couple of thousand GB£. Is this really the only way to obtain the certification? Can I not just buy a certification guide book from amazon and just sit the requisite tests? At the moment I have no Java EE experience and I'm finding it impossible to get interviews for the jobs I'm interested in. I'm hoping this will at least help me get my foot through the door.

    Read the article

  • If you should only have one assertion per test; how to test multiple inputs?

    - by speg
    I'm trying to build up some test cases, and have read that you should try and limit the number of assertions per test case. So my question is, what is the best way to go about testing a function w/ multiple inputs. For example, I have a function that parses a string from the user and returns the number of minutes. The string can be in the form "5w6h2d1m", where w, h, d, m correspond to the number of weeks, hours, days, and minutes. If I wanted to follow the '1 assertion per test rule' I'd have to make multiple tests for each variation of input? That seems silly so instead I just have something like: self.assertEqual(parse_date('5m'), 5) self.assertEqual(parse_date('5h'), 300) self.assertEqual(parse_date('5d') ,7200) self.assertEqual(parse_date('1d4h20m'), 1700) In the one test case. Is there a better way?

    Read the article

  • Spezialisierung ohne Grenzen

    - by A&C Redaktion
    Arrow erreicht Exadata Spezialisierung für alle EMEA-Länder “Know-how sells” – das weiß auch unser VAD Arrow. Der IT-Distributor aus Fürstenfeldbruck, nahe München, hat sich auf die Bereitstellung von Enterprise und Midrange Computing Lösungen fokussiert. So auch für die Exadata Technologie von Oracle. Exadata beinhaltet Server, Speicher, Netzwerktechnik und Datenbanksoftware in einem System und hilft so, auch große Datenmengen – die „Big Data“ – spielend zu managen. Die Kombination aus Hard- und Software bietet Oracle Partnern enorme Geschäftspotenziale im Verkauf und im Service, deshalb ist eine Expertise so wichtig. Durch die vier europäischen Demo-Zentren und insgesamt acht komplett installierte Exadata reichlich Erfahrung mit der Oracle Exa-Familie sammeln können. Der VAD bietet Oracle Partnern und Kunden Performance-Tests, Testumgebungen und Proof of Concepts (PoC) an – und das länderübergreifend. Als logische Konsequenz wurde Arrow im August 2012 mit der EMEA Spezialisierung für Exadata von Oracle ausgezeichnet! Wir gratulieren ganz herzlich und wünschen viel Erfolg mit dem Exa-Stack!

    Read the article

  • Spezialisierung ohne Grenzen

    - by A&C Redaktion
    Arrow erreicht Exadata Spezialisierung für alle EMEA-Länder “Know-how sells” – das weiß auch unser VAD Arrow. Der IT-Distributor aus Fürstenfeldbruck, nahe München, hat sich auf die Bereitstellung von Enterprise und Midrange Computing Lösungen fokussiert. So auch für die Exadata Technologie von Oracle. Exadata beinhaltet Server, Speicher, Netzwerktechnik und Datenbanksoftware in einem System und hilft so, auch große Datenmengen – die „Big Data“ – spielend zu managen. Die Kombination aus Hard- und Software bietet Oracle Partnern enorme Geschäftspotenziale im Verkauf und im Service, deshalb ist eine Expertise so wichtig. Durch die vier europäischen Demo-Zentren und insgesamt acht komplett installierte Exadata reichlich Erfahrung mit der Oracle Exa-Familie sammeln können. Der VAD bietet Oracle Partnern und Kunden Performance-Tests, Testumgebungen und Proof of Concepts (PoC) an – und das länderübergreifend. Als logische Konsequenz wurde Arrow im August 2012 mit der EMEA Spezialisierung für Exadata von Oracle ausgezeichnet! Wir gratulieren ganz herzlich und wünschen viel Erfolg mit dem Exa-Stack!

    Read the article

  • How to conduct A/B split testing with AdSense?

    - by None
    Ok so I have decided to A/B test my AdSense ads. I have run a few tests, but I don't know what conclusion to draw and how to keep track of things. Some specific questions: If I have 2 test units, 1 wins. I test that with a new and so on. How do I find if say the fifth one did better than the first one? How do I keep track of things? Do I let the variables independent of each other, because they certainly are not. In real life, font size can affect CTR even if the colors are different. I can test blue color with red color, and then test Arial font with Georgia, but how do I know which combination is the best? This would result in way too many test units. I tried Googling a lot, but I could not find answers to these questions.

    Read the article

  • 3D RTS pathfinding

    - by xcrypt
    I understand the A* algorithm, but I have some trouble doing it in 3D to suit the needs of my RTS Basically, in the game I'm making, there will be agents with different sizes of OBB collision boxes. I can use steering behaviours for avoiding other agents, so I don't need complete dynamic pathfinding. However, there is a problem because different agents have different collision geometry, and structures can be placed in almost any place. This means that there might be a gap between two structures where some agents can go through and some can't. A solution I have found to this problem is to do a sweep of the collision geometry of the agent from start node of the edge the pf algorithm is currently testing, to the end node of that edge. But this is probably a bit overkill since every edge the algorithm tests would also have to create and test with a collision geometry sweep. What are some reasonable approaches to this problem? I should mention that I'd prefer not to use navmeshes, I prefer waypoints because my entire system is based on it atm.

    Read the article

  • What Design Pattern is seperating transform converters

    - by RevMoon
    For converting a Java object model into XML I am using the following design: For different types of objects (e.g. primitive types, collections, null, etc.) I define each its own converter, which acts appropriate with respect to the given type. This way it can easily extended without adding code to a huge if-else-then construct. The converters are chosen by a method which tests whether the object is convertable at all and by using a priority ordering. The priority ordering is important so let's say a List is not converted by the POJO converter, even though it is convertable as such it would be more appropriate to use the collection converter. What design pattern is that? I can only think of a similarity to the command pattern.

    Read the article

  • Utility Objects–Waitfor Delay Coordinator (SQL Server 2008+)

    - by drsql
    Finally… took longer than I had expected when I wrote this a while back, but I had to move my website and get DNS moved before I could post code… When I write code, I do my best to test that code in as many ways as necessary. One of the last types of tests that is necessary is concurrency testing. Concurrency testing is one of the most difficult types of testing because it takes running multiple processes simultaneously and making sure that you get the correct answers multiple times. This is really...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Progressbar patterns (Eclipse)

    - by JesperE
    I've struggled quite a bit with Eclipse and progress-monitors to try to have good progressbars which report useful progress information to the user. Inevitably the code gets cluttered with lots of things like if (monitor.isCancelled()) return; ... lengthyMethodCall(monitor.newChild(10)); and all over the place I need to pass a IProgressMonitor as an argument to my methods. This is bad, for several reasons: The code gets cluttered with lots of code which is not relevant to what the function actually does. I need to manually guesstimate which parts of the code takes time, and which parts do not. It interacts badly with automated tests; where much of the information which goes into a progressbar instead should be logged for later inspection. Is there a way out of this? Are there tools which can help me out with one or more of these problems? Should I be looking at Aspect-Oriented Programming tools, or are there other alternatives?

    Read the article

  • StyleCop 4.7.33.0 has been released

    - by TATWORTH
    StyleCop 4.7.33.0 was released, today, 29/June at http://stylecop.codeplex.com/releases/view/79972This version is compatible with the Visual Studio 2012 RC (11.0.50522).Install order should be : VS2008VS2010VS2012 RCR#6.1.1 msi (for VS2010)R#7.0 (tested with daily build 7.0.70.189)StyleCop  This version is now compatible with R# 5.1 (5.1.3000.12), R# 6.0 (6.0.2202.688), R# 6.1 (6.1.37.86), R# 6.1.1 (6.1.1000.82) and R# 7.0 (7.0.70.189).Fixes for this release are:Updated docs for SA1103.Fix to not throw 1101 when is a nested interface. Added new tests.Fixes to install the ReSharper plugins back in the main directories for all users.Styling fixes.7291. Create indexer documentation better. Port fixes for 7289 and 7223 to 7.0.0 plugin.Fix for 7289. Create interface documentation better.Fix for 7223. Better text for inserted property text.Ensure WebSites and other folders containing aspx.cs files get analysed.Add re-analyse Project option to context menus (I asked for this one!)

    Read the article

  • How can I make refactoring a priority for my team?

    - by Joseph Garland
    The codebase I work with daily has no automated tests, inconsistent naming and tons of comments like "Why is this here?", "Not sure if this is needed" or "This method isn't named right" and the code is littered with "Changelogs" despite the fact we use source control. Suffice it to say, our codebase could use refactoring. We always have tasks to fix bugs or add new features, so no time is put aside to refactor code to be better and more modular, and it doesn't seem to be a high priority. How can I demonstrate the value of refactoring such that it gets added to our task lists? Is it worth it to just refactor as I go, asking for forgiveness rather than permission?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132  | Next Page >