Search Results

Search found 44056 results on 1763 pages for 'test case'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 13/1763 | < Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >

  • How to feature-detect/test for specific jQuery (and Javascript) methods/functions used

    - by Zildjoms
    good day everyone, hope yer all doin awesome am very new to javascript and jquery, and i (think) i have come up with a simple fade-in/out implementation on a site am workin on (check out http://www.s5ent.com/expandjs.html - if you have the time to check it for inefficiency or what that'd be real sweet). i use the following functions/methods/collections and i would like to do a feature test before using them. uhm.. how? or is there a better way to go about this? jQuery $ .fadeIn([duration]) .fadeOut([duration]) .attr(attributeName,value) .append(content) .each(function(index,Element)) .css(propertyName,value) .hover(handlerIn(eventObject),handlerOut(eventObject)) .stop([clearQueue],[jumpToEnd]) .parent() .eq(index) JavaScript setInterval(expression,timeout) clearInterval(timeoutId) setTimeout(expression,timeout) clearTimeout(timeoutId) i tried looking into jquery.support for the jquery ones, but i find myself running into conceptual problems with it, i.e. for fadein/fadeout, i (think i) should test for $.support.opacity, but that would be false in ie whereas ie6+ could still fairly render the fades. also am using jquery 1.2.6 coz that's enough for what i need. the support object is in 1.3. so i'm hoping to avoid dragging-in more unnecessary code if i can. i also worked with browser sniffing, no matter how frowned-upon. but that's also a bigger problem for me because of non-standard ua strings and spoofing and everything else am not aware of. so how do you guys think i should go about this? or should i even? is there a better way to go about making sure that i don't run code that'll eventually break the page? i've set it up to degrade into a css hover when javascript ain't there.. expertise needed. much appreciated, thanks guyz!

    Read the article

  • replace a bunch of show/hide with switch/case in javascript

    - by Adam
    Page has menu items that would replace a 'div id=foo_(current menu item)' with 'div id=foo_(selected menu item)' in 'div class=foo' Here's what I've got, and try to keep your breakfast down... $('#t1').click(function() { $('#attorney').show(); $('#insurance,#financial,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t2').click(function() { $('#insurance').show(); $('#attorney,#financial,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t3').click(function() { $('#financial').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t4').click(function() { $('#estate').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t5').click(function() { $('#trust').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#estate,#death').hide(); }); $('#t6').click(function() { $('#death').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#estate,#trust').hide(); });

    Read the article

  • replace a buch of show/hide with switch/case in javascript

    - by Adam
    Page has menu items that would replace a 'div id=foo_(current menu item)' with 'div id=foo_(selected menu item)' in 'div class=foo' Here's what I've got, and try to keep your breakfast down... $('#t1').click(function() { $('#attorney').show(); $('#insurance,#financial,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t2').click(function() { $('#insurance').show(); $('#attorney,#financial,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t3').click(function() { $('#financial').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#estate,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t4').click(function() { $('#estate').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#trust,#death').hide(); }); $('#t5').click(function() { $('#trust').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#estate,#death').hide(); }); $('#t6').click(function() { $('#death').show(); $('#attorney,#insurance,#financial,#estate,#trust').hide(); });

    Read the article

  • Overloading operator>> for case insensitive string

    - by TheSOFan
    Given the definition of ci_string from cpp.reference.com, how would we go about implementing operator? My attempts at it involved std::read, but it doesn't seem to work (that is, gcount() properly counts the number of characters entered, but there is no output) #include <iostream> #include <cctype> #include <string> // ci_string definition goes here std::istream& operator>>(std::istream& in, ci_string& str) { return in.read(&*str.begin(), 4); } int main() { ci_string test_str; std::cin >> test_str; std::cout << test_str; return 0; }

    Read the article

  • c# converting select case VBA to c# SWITCH

    - by herrow
    i have some vba code that i need to convert to c# Select Case letter0 Case "A01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "1" Case "B01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "2" Case "C01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "3" Case "D01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "4" Case "E01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "5" Case "F01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "6" Case "G01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "7" Case "H01" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "8" Case "A02" Cells(rownum, 2).Value = "9" Case "B02" ... .. i understand how to do a switch on this, but is there an easier method? i will not be checking CELLS(rownum.........) instead of will be doing switch(somestring) is there an easier way to do this than explicitly write every single case?

    Read the article

  • case sensititivity with users controller on certain hosting

    - by Leo
    We generally use two different hosting services. On one, everything works ticketyboo, as it does on my local dev servers. On the other server, however, I am having this problem: I can't access the users controller like this: http://www.example.com/users/login But I can like this: http://www.example.com/Users/login ** note the capitalised 'Users' ** If I displace the application to a sub-folder everything works fine (both upper- and lowercase). The hosting company have looked at it and can't see a problem at their end and they assure me that users is not a reserved word. You might say this isn't a problem, just use the version that works. Unfortunately it leads to problems downstream where Cake core starts generating urls itself. Anybody else seen this problem or know the solution? [This only occurs on the users controller - all others work as expected]

    Read the article

  • How fast are my services? Comparing basicHttpBinding and ws2007HttpBinding using the SO-Aware Test Workbench

    - by gsusx
    When working on real world WCF solutions, we become pretty aware of the performance implications of the binding and behavior configuration of WCF services. However, whether it’s a known fact the different binding and behavior configurations have direct reflections on the performance of WCF services, developers often struggle to figure out the real performance behavior of the services. We can attribute this to the lack of tools for correctly testing the performance characteristics of WCF services...(read more)

    Read the article

  • Power supply triggered to start by another power supply

    - by steampowered
    I am building a raid array in a separate enclosure. I will be putting an empty tower case next to an existing tower computer, and this second tower case will only hold hard drives. There are many solutions for connecting the drives in the second case to the raid card in the first case (SFF-8088 and SFF-8087 cables). But I prefer not to run power from the first case to the second case. Can I use a power supply in the first tower case and cause it to start the power supply in the second case based on an indication from power in the first tower case's power supply? Maybe run a 12 volt cable from the first case to the power supply on the second case only for the purpose of initiating the second power supply.

    Read the article

  • Adaptive Case Management – Exposing the API – part 1 by Roger Goossens

    - by JuergenKress
    One of the most important building blocks of Adaptive Case Management is the ACM API. At one point or another you’re gonna need a way to get information (think about a list of stakeholders, available activities, milestones reached, etc.) out of the case. Since there’s no webservice available yet that exposes the internals of the case, your only option right now is the ACM API. ACM evangelist Niall Commiskey has put some samples online to give you a good feeling of the power of the ACM API. The examples show how you can access the API by means of RMI. You first need to obtain a BPMServiceClientFactory that gives access to the important services you’ll mostly be needing, i.e. the IBPMUserAuthenticationService (needed for obtaining a valid user context) and the ICaseService (the service that exposes all important case information). Now, obtaining an instance of the BPMServiceClientFactory involves some boilerplate coding in which you’ll need the RMI url and user credentials: Read the complete article here. SOA & BPM Partner Community For regular information on Oracle SOA Suite become a member in the SOA & BPM Partner Community for registration please visit www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) If you need support with your account please contact the Oracle Partner Business Center. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Wiki Technorati Tags: ACM,API,Adaptive Case Management,Community,Oracle SOA,Oracle BPM,OPN,Jürgen Kress

    Read the article

  • Case Class naming convention

    - by KChaloux
    In my recent adventures in Scala, I've found case classes to be a really nice alternative to enums when I need to include a bit of logic or several values with them. I often find myself writing structures that look like this, however: object Foo{ case class Foo(name: String, value: Int, other: Double) val BAR = Foo("bar", 1, 1.0) val BAZ = Foo("baz", 2, 1.5) val QUUX = Foo("quux", 3, 1.75) } I'm primarily worried here about the naming of the object and the case class. Since they're the same thing, I end up with Foo.Foo to get to the inner class. Would it be wise to name the case class something along the lines of FooCase instead? I'm not sure if the potential ambiguity might mess with the type system if I have to do anything with subtypes or inheritance.

    Read the article

  • Case Management In-Depth: Stakeholders & Permissions by Mark Foster

    - by JuergenKress
    We’ve seen in the previous 3 posts in this series what Case Management is, how it can be configured in BPM Studio and its lifecycle. I now want to go into some more depth with specific areas such as:. Stakeholders & Permissions Case Activities Case Rules etc. In the process of designing a Case Management solution it is important to know what approach to take, what questions to ask and based on the answers to these questions, how to implement. I’ll start with Stakeholders & Permissions. Stakeholders The users that perform actions on case objects, defined at a business level, e.g. “Help Desk Agent”, “Help Desk Supervisor” etc. Read the full article here. SOA & BPM Partner Community For regular information on Oracle SOA Suite become a member in the SOA & BPM Partner Community for registration please visit www.oracle.com/goto/emea/soa (OPN account required) If you need support with your account please contact the Oracle Partner Business Center. Blog Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Wiki Mix Forum Technorati Tags: ACM,BPM,Mark Foster,SOA Community,Oracle SOA,Oracle BPM,Community,OPN,Jürgen Kress

    Read the article

  • Should we test all our methods?

    - by Zenzen
    So today I had a talk with my teammate about unit testing. The whole thing started when he asked me "hey, where are the tests for that class, I see only one?". The whole class was a manager (or a service if you prefer to call it like that) and almost all the methods were simply delegating stuff to a DAO so it was similar to: SomeClass getSomething(parameters) { return myDao.findSomethingBySomething(parameters); } A kind of boilerplate with no logic (or at least I do not consider such simple delegation as logic) but a useful boilerplate in most cases (layer separation etc.). And we had a rather lengthy discussion whether or not I should unit test it (I think that it is worth mentioning that I did fully unit test the DAO). His main arguments being that it was not TDD (obviously) and that someone might want to see the test to check what this method does (I do not know how it could be more obvious) or that in the future someone might want to change the implementation and add new (or more like "any") logic to it (in which case I guess someone should simply test that logic). This made me think, though. Should we strive for the highest test coverage %? Or is it simply an art for art's sake then? I simply do not see any reason behind testing things like: getters and setters (unless they actually have some logic in them) "boilerplate" code Obviously a test for such a method (with mocks) would take me less than a minute but I guess that is still time wasted and a millisecond longer for every CI. Are there any rational/not "flammable" reasons to why one should test every single (or as many as he can) line of code?

    Read the article

  • Unittest test case only touches the file name

    - by Chen OT
    I was told that unittest is fast and the tests which touches DB, across network, and touches FileSystem are not unittest. In one of my testcases, its input are the file names (amount about 300~400) under a specific folder. Although these input are part of file system, the execution time of this test is very fast. Should I moved this test, which is fast but touches file system, to higher level test?

    Read the article

  • How to make the tokenizer detect empty spaces while using strtok()

    - by Shadi Al Mahallawy
    I am designing a c++ program, somewhere in the program i need to detect if there is a blank(empty token) next to the token used know eg. if(token1==start) { token2=strtok(NULL," "); if(token2==NULL) {LCCTR=0;} else {LCCTR=atoi(token2);} so in the previous peice token1 is pointing to start , and i want to check if there is anumber next to the start , so I used token2=strtok(NULL," ") to point to the next token but unfortunattly the strtok function cannot detect empty spaces so it gives me an error at run time"INVALID NULL POINTER" how can i fix it or is there another function to use to detect empty spaces #include <iostream> #include<string> #include<map> #include<iomanip> #include<fstream> #include<ctype.h> using namespace std; const int MAX=300; int LCCTR; int START(char* token1); char* PASS1(char*token1); void tokinizer() { ifstream in; ofstream out; char oneline[MAX]; in.open("infile.txt"); out.open("outfile.txt"); if(in.is_open()) { char *token1; in.getline(oneline,MAX); token1 = strtok(oneline," \t"); START (token1); //cout<<'\t'; while(token1!=NULL) { //PASS1(token1); //cout<<token1<<" "; token1=strtok(NULL," \t"); if(NULL==token1) {//cout<<endl; //cout<<LCCTR<<'\t'; in.getline(oneline,MAX); token1 = strtok(oneline," \t"); } } } in.close(); out.close(); } int START(char* token1) { string start("START"); char*token2; if(token1 != start) {LCCTR=0;} else if(token1==start) { token2=strchr(token1+2,' '); cout<<token2; if(token2==NULL) {LCCTR=0;} else {LCCTR=atoi(token2); if(atoi(token2)>9999||atoi(token2)<0){cout<<"IVALID STARTING ADDRESS"<<endl;exit(1);} } } return LCCTR; } char* PASS1 (char*token1) { map<string,int> operations; map<string,int>symtable; map<string,int>::iterator it; pair<map<string,int>::iterator,bool> ret; char*token3=NULL; char*token2=NULL; string test; string comp(" "); string start("START"); string word("WORD"); string byte("BYTE"); string resb("RESB"); string resw("RESW"); string end("END"); operations["ADD"] = 18; operations["AND"] = 40; operations["COMP"] = 28; operations["DIV"] = 24; operations["J"] = 0X3c; operations["JEQ"] =30; operations["JGT"] =34; operations["JLT"] =38; operations["JSUB"] =48; operations["LDA"] =00; operations["LDCH"] =50; operations["LDL"] =55; operations["LDX"] =04; operations["MUL"] =20; operations["OR"] =44; operations["RD"] =0xd8; operations["RSUB"] =0x4c; operations["STA"] =0x0c; operations["STCH"] =54; operations["STL"] =14; operations["STSW"] =0xe8; operations["STX"] =10; operations["SUB"] =0x1c; operations["TD"] =0xe0; operations["TIX"] =0x2c; operations["WD"] =0xdc; if(operations.find("ADD")->first==token1) { token2=strtok(NULL," "); //test=token2; cout<<token2; //if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} //else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } /*else if(operations.find("AND")->first==token1) { token2=strtok(NULL," "); test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("COMP")->first==token1) { token2=token1+5; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("DIV")->first==token1) { token2=token1+4; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("J")->first==token1) { token2=token1+2; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("JEQ")->first==token1) { token2=token1+5; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("JGT")->first==token1) { token2=strtok(NULL," "); test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("JLT")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("JSUB")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("LDA")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("LDCH")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("LDL")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("LDX")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("MUL")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("OR")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("RD")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("RSUB")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("STA")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("STCH")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("STL")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("STSW")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("STX")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("SUB")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("TD")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("TIX")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} } else if(operations.find("WD")->first==token1) { token2=token1+6; test=token2; if(test.empty()){cout<<"MISSING OPERAND"<<endl;exit(1);} else{LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} }*/ //else if( if(word==token1) {LCCTR=LCCTR+3;} else if(byte==token1) {string test; token2=token1+7; test=token2; if(test[0]=='C') {token3=token1+10; test=token3; if(test.length()>15) {cout<<"ERROR"<<endl; exit(1);} } else if(test[0]=='X') {token3=token1+10; test=token3; if(test.length()>14) {cout<<"ERROR"<<endl; exit(1);} } LCCTR=LCCTR+test.length(); } else if(resb==token1) {token3=token1+5; LCCTR=LCCTR+atoi(token3);} else if(resw==token1) {token3=token1+5; LCCTR=LCCTR+3*atoi(token3);} else if(end==token1) {exit(1);} /*else { test=token1; int last=test.length(); if(token1==start||test[0]=='C'||test[0]=='X'||ispunct(test[last])||isdigit(test[0])||isdigit(test[1])||isdigit(test[2])||isdigit(test[3])){} else { token2=strtok(NULL," "); //test=token2; cout<<token2; if(token2!=NULL) { symtable.insert( pair<string,int>(token1,LCCTR)); for(it=symtable.begin() ;it!=symtable.end() ;++it) {/*cout<<"symbol: "<<it->first<<" LCCTR: "<<it->second<<endl;} } else{} } }*/ return token3; } int main() { tokinizer(); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Microsoft Test Manager from Visual Studio 2010 Ultimate

    - by LeeHull
    Anyone know the OS requirements for this? The actual System Requirements mention Windows 7 but after spending the time installing and configuring and finally get it up and running, went to the Testing Center and I get this message. "The Test Management features are not supported on Windows Home Premium." I now have to upgrade my Windows but I want to be sure what version is required

    Read the article

  • Wierd Results A/B Test in Google Website Optimizer

    - by Yisroel
    I set up a test in Google Website Optimizer that has a 3 variations - original (A), B, and C. In order to further validate the results of the test, I added a variation C that is exactly the same as the original. And thats where the results get weird. 6 days in to the test, the best performing variation is C. It outperforms the original by 18.4%! How is that possible? Do I now discount the results of this test entirely?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20  | Next Page >