Search Results

Search found 10096 results on 404 pages for 'dom events'.

Page 130/404 | < Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >

  • onclick event is not fire in google chrome

    - by purnang.advant
    I am trying to fire the asp.net button click event from javascript. Its working fine in IE, but the same code is not working on Chrome, please help me. Here is the js code, var btnSave = document.getElementById('btnSave'); btnSave.click(); alert("The changes are saved sucessfully!!"); Please help me

    Read the article

  • Javascript Event for Select element Selection

    - by JP
    Hi everyone, I'm looking to find the Javascript Event I need to put into jQuery's .bind function in order to have the function triggered when a selection is made from a <select> element. At the moment I'm using .bind('change',function() { ...}) but I need the event to trigger when the selected option is chosen again. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Detecting html textarea's change

    - by Colby77
    Hi, I'd like to monitor my textarea's changes with jQuery. I can do this with the keyup event and it works perfectly. But what event I can get when a user click on the textarea (right mouse click), then choose paste? Click event occur only when the user click with the left mouse button on the textarea. How can I handle this situation?

    Read the article

  • What does addListener do in node.js?

    - by Jeffrey
    I am trying to understand the purpose of addListener in node.js. Can someone explain please? Thanks! A simple example would be: var tcp = require('tcp'); var server = tcp.createServer(function (socket) { socket.setEncoding("utf8"); socket.addListener("connect", function () { socket.write("hello\r\n"); }); socket.addListener("data", function (data) { socket.write(data); }); socket.addListener("end", function () { socket.write("goodbye\r\n"); socket.end(); }); }); server.listen(7000, "localhost");

    Read the article

  • Swing: How do I run a job from AWT thread, but after a window was layed out?

    - by java.is.for.desktop
    My complete GUI runs inside the AWT thread, because I start the main window using SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(...). Now I have a JDialog which has just to display a JLabel, which indicates that a certain job is in progress, and close that dialog after the job was finished. The problem is: the label is not displayed. That job seems to be started before JDialog was fully layed-out. When I just let the dialog open without waiting for a job and closing, the label is displayed. The last thing the dialog does in its ctor is setVisible(true). Things such as revalidate(), repaint(), ... don't help either. Even when I start a thread for the monitored job, and wait for it using someThread.join() it doesn't help, because the current thread (which is the AWT thread) is blocked by join, I guess. Replacing JDialog with JFrame doesn't help either. So, is the concept wrong in general? Or can I manage it to do certain job after it is ensured that a JDialog (or JFrame) is fully layed-out? Simplified algorithm of what I'm trying to achieve: Create a subclass of JDialog Ensure that it and its contents are fully layed-out Start a process and wait for it to finish (threaded or not, doesn't matter) Close the dialog I managed to write a reproducible test case: EDIT Problem from an answer is now addressed: This use case does display the label, but it fails to close after the "simulated process", because of dialog's modality. import java.awt.*; import javax.swing.*; public class _DialogTest2 { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { SwingUtilities.invokeAndWait(new Runnable() { final JLabel jLabel = new JLabel("Please wait..."); @Override public void run() { JFrame myFrame = new JFrame("Main frame"); myFrame.setDefaultCloseOperation(JFrame.EXIT_ON_CLOSE); myFrame.setSize(750, 500); myFrame.setLocationRelativeTo(null); myFrame.setVisible(true); JDialog d = new JDialog(myFrame, "I'm waiting"); d.setModalityType(Dialog.ModalityType.APPLICATION_MODAL); d.add(jLabel); d.setSize(300, 200); d.setLocationRelativeTo(null); d.setVisible(true); SwingUtilities.invokeLater(new Runnable() { @Override public void run() { try { Thread.sleep(3000); // simulate process jLabel.setText("Done"); } catch (InterruptedException ex) { } } }); d.setVisible(false); d.dispose(); myFrame.setVisible(false); myFrame.dispose(); } }); } }

    Read the article

  • Bind an event handler to multiple elements jQuery?

    - by Alex
    Hello all. I've done some experimenting, but can't seem to successfully bind one event handler to multiple elements using jQuery. Here's what I've tried: $('selector1', 'selector2').bind('click', function() { $('someSelector').removeClass('coolClass'); }); I've tested all my selectors, and they are all valid. Is what I'm trying to do even possible? If so, can I do it with .live() as well? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Trying to perform a series of actions on page unload, but the pages unloads too fast to finish them.

    - by user138821
    I have a series of actions I want to perform on page unload. Namely if a user is editing an input field, and they refresh or close browser or leave page, I want to save the contents of the field. The actions don't include an AJAX call, so I can't just make it synchronous. It's actually saving to local storage, but the page unloads before the storage can take place. The code is correct, if I add an alert to the actions, the delay allows the rest of the code to finish before it even displays. Any ideas? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • jQuery Mobile button js control

    - by David
    I have a button that is not triggering event in jQuery mobile. It was working but I had to remove the css. It was screwing up my all my ul lists. Any help would greatly appreciated Here is the code for the button at the bottom of the form : <div class="next"> <a class="btnNext">Next &gt;&gt;</a> </div> Which is supposed to do this on a separate js file: init: function(){ $('.btnNext').onclick(function(){ if ($('input[type=radio]:checked:visible').length == 0) { return false; } $(this).parents('.questionContainer').fadeOut(500, function(){ Here is the css I removed: a { border: 1px solid #000; padding: 2px 5px; font-weight: bold; font-size: 10px; background: #FFF; cursor: pointer; } a:hover { background: none; }

    Read the article

  • .focus() doesn't work on an input while orher attributes works

    - by Sirber
    I have a classic table / thead / tbody structure, which I add a line at the end of the tbody. The line contains only an input element. The code works in Firefox 3.6 but not in Chrome v5 or IE8. I'm using jQuery 1.4.1. Does not work: $("#" + AJAX_ID).parent().find('tr:last > td:nth-child(2) > input').focus(); Does work: $("#" + AJAX_ID).parent().find('tr:last > td:nth-child(2) > input').css('background-color', 'red'); even setting an ID on the input, and using document.getElementBuId('id').focus() doesn't work. Thank you!

    Read the article

  • JQuery UI (1.8) Select Event not working on Autocomplete

    - by Cyril Gupta
    I am trying to use JQuery UI autocomplete (1.8) for an app. It is set up like this: $('#txtigtags').autocomplete({ serviceUrl: '/tags/searchtags' + $('#txtigtags').val(), minChars: 2, delimiter: ' ', select: function () { alert(''); }, deferRequestBy: 500 }); According to the documentation the select event should fire whenever an entry is selected in the drop-menu and I should get the alert. But the select event is not firing at all. Neither is focus. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Click event not registering on second page.

    - by Cptcecil
    I'm using tablesorter and tablesorter.pager. Here is my code. $(document).ready(function() { $("#peopletable") .tablesorter({ widthFixed: true, widgets: ['zebra'] }) .tablesorterFilter({ filterContainer: $("#people-filter-box"), filterClearContainer: $("#people-filter-clear-button"), filterColumns: [1, 2, 3], filterCaseSensitive: false }) .tablesorterPager({ container: $("#peoplepager") }); $("#peopletable tr.data").click(function() { var personid = $(this).attr('id'); $.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "/Search/GetDocumentsByPerson", data: { "id": personid }, datatype: "json", success: function(data) { var results = eval(data); $("#documentstable > tbody tr").remove(); $.each(results, function(key, item) { $("#documentstable > tbody:last").append(html); }); $("#documentstable").trigger("update"); } }); }); }); Everything works great except when I click on the next page my button click event doesn't fire. Is this a known issue with jquery tablesorter?

    Read the article

  • listener not being called

    - by deb
    I have a table with a button. When the button is clicked I call Modalbox.show (http://okonet.ru/projects/modalbox/) that displays a little form with another button. When the user clicks this second button, a listener is attached to an iframe in the form and the form is submitted to the server. The server does something then it should return back to the form and execute the listener function. This works fine on IE but not in Firefox (on Firefox it never comes back). Here it is the javascript function that is called when the user presses the second button (in the Modalbox) function attachFile() { //window.frames['upload_iframe'].name='upload_iframe'; iframe = document.getElementById('upload_iframe'); if (iframe.addEventListener)//FF iframe.addEventListener("load", iframeEventHandler, false); if (iframe.attachEvent)//IE iframe.attachEvent("onload", iframeEventHandler); // Set properties of form... form = document.getElementById('attchForm'); form.setAttribute("target","upload_iframe"); form.setAttribute("method","post"); form.setAttribute("enctype","multipart/form-data"); form.setAttribute("encoding","multipart/form-data"); // Submit the form... form.submit(); } I checked that it is adding the listener but somehow does not return to it. Any hints? Thanks deb

    Read the article

  • C# BackgroundWorker RunWorkerCompleted Event

    - by Jim Fell
    My C# application has several background workers. Sometimes one background worker will fire off another. When the first background worker completes and the RunWorkerCompleted event is fired, on which thread will that event fire, the UI or the first background worker from which RunWorkerAsync was called? I am using Microsoft Visual C# 2008 Express Edition. Any thoughts or suggestions you may have would be appreciated. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Jquery - removing an image before the client browser attempts to download it

    - by ajbrun
    Hi there, I wonder if anyone could help me with a problem I've been having. I have a number of large images available, but due to space limitations, I can't create multiple copies of these at various sizes. I have used PHP GD functions to resize the images to the sizes I need and output them to the browser. This works, but obviously takes some processing time, which therefore impacts pages load times. I'm fine with this, but I only want to show the image once it's fully loaded, and have a loading gif in its place until that time. I'm using jquery to do this. The problem I'm having is making the page functional whether the client has javascript enabled or not. If JS is not enabled, I want standard img tags to be outputted, otherwise the images are removed and replaced with a loading gif until they have been fully loaded. The link below shows a simple non-javascript unfriendly example of a what I want to do (try turning JS off): http://jqueryfordesigners.com/demo/image-load-demo.php I've been testing the basics using the code below. The attr() function will be replaced with something like remove(). This is just a test to make something happen to the image before the browser tries to load it. $(document).ready(function() { $( "#Thumbnails .thumbnail img" ).attr('src', '#'); }); In IE, this works correctly - the image source is replaced with "#" BEFORE the client browser gets a chance to start downloading the image. In firefox however, it downloads the image, and THEN changes the source. It seems to me that firefox is loading the jquery onready event later than it should. As far as I know, this should be executed before the standard onload event and before anything has started loading. If it helps, I'm testing it with a good number of images on screen (81). Am I doing something wrong?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET button_click not firing, after browser back button

    - by the berserker
    I have a ASPX Page that contains several user controls, which are loaded dynamically after user interaction. On one of ascx I have a hidden button that is being clicked on some user actions (via button.click()), which works fine on 1st page load. But after the form is being submitted once, the other ascx is loaded. There if user clicks the back button and resubmits the 1st form (again via button.click()), button_clicked event on server does not fire again. Any thought?

    Read the article

  • Form Search Onkeyup event

    - by Aryan
    I Have a Form In which the form should automatically search when i complete entering the 10th character in the text field but the below code is searching for each n every character i enter in the text field . . . I just want the result after completing the 10th character not for each n every character . . i have used onkeyup event and i set that value to 10 but still it is searching for each n every character... please do help me <body OnKeyPress="return disableKeyPress(event)"> <section id="content" class="container_12 clearfix" data-sort=true> <center><table class='dynamic styled with-prev-next' data-table-tools='{'display':true}' align=center> <script> function disableEnterKey(e) { var key; if(window.event) key = window.event.keyCode; //IE else key = e.which; //firefox return (key != 13); } function showUser(str) { if (str=="") { document.getElementById("txtHint").innerHTML=""; return; } if (window.XMLHttpRequest) {// code for IE7+, Firefox, Chrome, Opera, Safari xmlhttp=new XMLHttpRequest(); } else {// code for IE6, IE5 xmlhttp=new ActiveXObject("Microsoft.XMLHTTP"); } xmlhttp.onreadystatechange=function() { if (xmlhttp.readyState==4 && xmlhttp.status==200) { document.getElementById("txtHint").innerHTML=xmlhttp.responseText; } } xmlhttp.open("GET","resdb.php?id="+str,true); xmlhttp.send(); } </script> <script type='text/javascript'> //<![CDATA[ $(window).load(function(){ $('#id').keyup(function(){ if(this.value.length ==10) }); });//]]> </script> <form id="form" method="post" name="form" > <tr><td><p align="center"><font size="3"><b>JNTUH - B.Tech IV Year II Semester (R07) Advance Supplementary Results - July 2012</b></font></p></td></tr> <td><p align="center"><b>Last Date for RC/RV : 8th August 2012</b></p></td> <tr><td><p align="center"></b> <input type="text" onkeyup="showUser(this.value)" onKeyPress="return disableEnterKey(event)" data-type="autocomplete" data-source="extras/autocomplete1.php" name="id" id="id" maxlength="10" placeholder=" Hall-Ticket Number">&emsp;</p></td></tr> </table> </center> </form> <center> <div id="txtHint"><b>Results will be displayed here</b></div> </center> </body>

    Read the article

  • Linux signals with extra information parameter

    - by Tester
    I was to have some extra information in the callback to sa_sigaction handler, it does not seems possible. So I was wondering if you could suggest me alternatives. Basic requirements: Function A raises an signal/event with a pointer to a struct Handler function tackles the event. The handler function would only be called on an event and a loop to wait for the event, as in select() , is undesirable. TIA

    Read the article

  • When designing an event, is it a good idea to prevent listeners from being added twice?

    - by Matt
    I am creating an event-based API where a user can subscribe to an event by adding listener objects (as is common in Java or C#). When the event is raised, all subscribed listeners are invoked with the event information. I initially decided to prevent adding an event listener more than once. If a listener is added that already exists in the listener collection, it is not added again. However, after thinking about it some more, it doesn't seem that most event-based structures actually prevent this. Was my initial instinct wrong? I'm not sure which way to go here. I guess I thought that preventing addition of an existing listener would help to avoid a common programming error. Then again, it could also hide a bug that would lead to code being run multiple times when it shouldn't.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137  | Next Page >