Search Results

Search found 4449 results on 178 pages for 'cocoa bindings'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 135/178 | < Previous Page | 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142  | Next Page >

  • Is it any loose coupling mechanism in Objective-C + Cocoa like C# delegates or C++Qt signals+slots?

    - by Eye of Hell
    Hello. For a large programs, the standard way to chalenge a complexity is to divide a program code into small objects. Most of the actual programming languages offer this functionality via classes, so is Objective-C. But after source code is separated into small object, the second challenge is to somehow connect them with each over. Standard approaches, supported by most languages are compositon (one object is a member field of another), inheritance, templates (generics) and callbacks. More cryptic techniques include method-level delagates (C#) and signals+slots (C++Qt). I like the delegates / signals idea, since while connecting two objects i can connect individual methods with each over, without objects knowing anything of each over. For C#, it will look like this: var object1 = new CObject1(); var object2 = new CObject2(); object1.SomethingHappened += object2.HandleSomething; In this code, is object1 calls it's SomethingHappened delegate (like a normal method call) the HandleSomething method of object2 will be called. For C++Qt, it will look like this: var object1 = new CObject1(); var object2 = new CObject2(); connect( object1, SIGNAL(SomethingHappened()), object2, SLOT(HandleSomething()) ); The result will be exactly the same. This technique has some advantages and disadvantages, but generally i like it more than interfaces since if program code base grows i can change connections and add new ones without creating tons of interfaces. After examination of Objective-C i havn't found any way to use this technique i like :(. It seems that Objective-C supports message passing perfectly well, but it requres for object1 to have a pointer to object2 in order to pass it a message. If some object needs to be connected to lots of other objects, in Objective-C i will be forced to give him pointers to each of the objects it must be connected. So, the question :). Is it any approach in Objective-C programming that will closely resemble delegate / signal+slot types of connection, not a 'give first object an entire pointer to second object so it can pass a message to it'. Method-level connections are a bit more preferable to me than object-level connection ^_^.

    Read the article

  • Subclassing Cocoa means no subclass ivars in some cases?

    - by Michael
    The question is generally coming from self = [super init]. In case if I'm subclassing NSSomething and in my init's method self = [super init] returns object of different class, does it mean I am not able to have my very own ivars in my subclass, just because self will be pointing to different class? Appreciate if you could bring some examples if my statement is wrong.

    Read the article

  • how do I determine how much VRAM is in the system?

    - by Cocoa Dev
    I just bought a Samsung Series 7 laptop but I have no idea how much VRAM the graphics card has. This is an NVIDIA OPTIMUS card. I am using Windows 7 and will upgrade to 8 within the hour. I switched from Mac to PC. So its not familiar to me. I am sorry that you guys know where to look and think this question is very trivial. Someone is selling me his laptop and claims it has 1GB VRAM. The stock # says it should have 512MB and I wanted to verify these details.

    Read the article

  • How do I load external images into Excel? [duplicate]

    - by Cocoa Dev
    This question already has an answer here: Inserting a (jpg) picture into a cell in Microsoft Excel 2007 1 answer I have a table with a column of links (URLs) to images. I want to load the linked images into the next cell over. For example: A1 contains http://example.com/image.jpg I want to load the image in B1. How can I do it?

    Read the article

  • Convert Dynamic to Type and convert Type to Dynamic

    - by Jon Canning
    public static class DynamicExtensions     {         public static T FromDynamic<T>(this IDictionary<string, object> dictionary)         {             var bindings = new List<MemberBinding>();             foreach (var sourceProperty in typeof(T).GetProperties().Where(x => x.CanWrite))             {                 var key = dictionary.Keys.SingleOrDefault(x => x.Equals(sourceProperty.Name, StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));                 if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(key)) continue;                 var propertyValue = dictionary[key];                 bindings.Add(Expression.Bind(sourceProperty, Expression.Constant(propertyValue)));             }             Expression memberInit = Expression.MemberInit(Expression.New(typeof(T)), bindings);             return Expression.Lambda<Func<T>>(memberInit).Compile().Invoke();         }         public static dynamic ToDynamic<T>(this T obj)         {             IDictionary<string, object> expando = new ExpandoObject();             foreach (var propertyInfo in typeof(T).GetProperties())             {                 var propertyExpression = Expression.Property(Expression.Constant(obj), propertyInfo);                 var currentValue = Expression.Lambda<Func<string>>(propertyExpression).Compile().Invoke();                 expando.Add(propertyInfo.Name.ToLower(), currentValue);             }             return expando as ExpandoObject;         }     }

    Read the article

  • How to configure multiple WCF binding configurations for the same scheme

    - by Sandor Drieënhuizen
    I have a set of IIS7-hosted net.tcp WCF services that serve my ASP.NET MVC web application. The web application is accessed over the internet. WCF Services (IIS7) <--> ASP.NET MVC Application <--> Client Browser The services are username authenticated, the account that a client (of my web application) uses to logon ends up as the current principal on the host. I want one of the services to be authenticated differently, because it serves the view model for my logon view. When it's called, the client is obviously not logged on yet. I figure Windows authentication serves best or perhaps just certificate based security (which in fact I should use for the authenticated services as well) if the services are hosted on a machine that is not in the same domain as the web application. That's not the point here though. Using multiple TCP bindings is what's giving me trouble. I tried setting it up like this in my client configuration: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1" binding="netTcpBinding" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service1.svc"/> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2" binding="netTcpBinding" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc"/> </client> The server configuration is this: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding portSharingEnabled="true"> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <services> <service name="Service1"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" address=""/> </service> <service name="Service2"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" address=""/> </service> </services> <serviceHostingEnvironment> <serviceActivations> <add relativeAddress="Service1.svc" service="Server.Service1"/> <add relativeAddress="Service2.svc" service="Server.Service2"/> </serviceActivations> </serviceHostingEnvironment> The thing is that both bindings don't seem to want live together in my host. When I remove either of them, all's fine but together they produce the following exception on the client: The requested upgrade is not supported by 'net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc'. This could be due to mismatched bindings (for example security enabled on the client and not on the server). In the server trace log, I find the following exception: Protocol Type application/negotiate was sent to a service that does not support that type of upgrade. Am I looking into the right direction or is there a better way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • Configuring multiple WCF binding configurations for the same scheme doesn't work

    - by Sandor Drieënhuizen
    I have a set of IIS7-hosted net.tcp WCF services that serve my ASP.NET MVC web application. The web application is accessed over the internet. WCF Services (IIS7) <--> ASP.NET MVC Application <--> Client Browser The services are username authenticated, the account that a client (of my web application) uses to logon ends up as the current principal on the host. I want one of the services to be authenticated differently, because it serves the view model for my logon view. When it's called, the client is obviously not logged on yet. I figure Windows authentication serves best or perhaps just certificate based security (which in fact I should use for the authenticated services as well) if the services are hosted on a machine that is not in the same domain as the web application. That's not the point here though. Using multiple TCP bindings is what's giving me trouble. I tried setting it up like this in my client configuration: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1" binding="netTcpBinding" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service1.svc"/> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2" binding="netTcpBinding" bindingConfiguration="public" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc"/> </client> The server configuration is this: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding portSharingEnabled="true"> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <services> <service name="Service1"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" address=""/> </service> <service name="Service2"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" bindingConfiguration="public" address=""/> </service> </services> <serviceHostingEnvironment> <serviceActivations> <add relativeAddress="Service1.svc" service="Server.Service1"/> <add relativeAddress="Service2.svc" service="Server.Service2"/> </serviceActivations> </serviceHostingEnvironment> The thing is that both bindings don't seem to want live together in my host. When I remove either of them, all's fine but together they produce the following exception on the client: The requested upgrade is not supported by 'net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc'. This could be due to mismatched bindings (for example security enabled on the client and not on the server). In the server trace log, I find the following exception: Protocol Type application/negotiate was sent to a service that does not support that type of upgrade. Am I looking into the right direction or is there a better way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • How to configurie multiple distinct WCF binding configurations for the same scheme

    - by Sandor Drieënhuizen
    I have a set of IIS7-hosted net.tcp WCF services that serve my ASP.NET MVC web application. The web application is accessed over the internet. WCF Services (IIS7) <--> ASP.NET MVC Application <--> Client Browser The services are username authenticated, the account that a client (of my web application) uses to logon ends up as the current principal on the host. I want one of the services to be authenticated differently, because it serves the view model for my logon view. When it's called, the client is obviously not logged on yet. I figure Windows authentication serves best or perhaps just certificate based security (which in fact I should use for the authenticated services as well) if the services are hosted on a machine that is not in the same domain as the web application. That's not the point here though. Using multiple TCP bindings is what's giving me trouble. I tried setting it up like this in my client configuration: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1" binding="netTcpBinding" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service1.svc"/> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2" binding="netTcpBinding" address="net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc"/> </client> The server configuration is this: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding portSharingEnabled="true"> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> <services> <service name="Service1"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService1, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" address=""/> </service> <service name="Service2"> <endpoint contract="Server.IService2, Library" binding="netTcpBinding" address=""/> </service> </services> <serviceHostingEnvironment> <serviceActivations> <add relativeAddress="Service1.svc" service="Server.Service1"/> <add relativeAddress="Service2.svc" service="Server.Service2"/> </serviceActivations> </serviceHostingEnvironment> The thing is that both bindings don't seem to want live together in my host. When I remove either of them, all's fine but together they produce the following exception on the client: The requested upgrade is not supported by 'net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc'. This could be due to mismatched bindings (for example security enabled on the client and not on the server). In the server trace log, I find the following exception: Protocol Type application/negotiate was sent to a service that does not support that type of upgrade. Am I looking into the right direction or is there a better way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • JQuery: How do you use live with the post function

    - by Luke101
    When load the new html from a post function I lose all of my click bindings. I read that i could use live to keep all the bindings but can't find any examples where live is used with post. Here is my code: var AddGroup = function (Obj) { $('.Selectiontarget').live('post', function () { $.post('/List/AddGroupItem?ListID=' + Obj, function (data) { $('.Selectiontarget').html(data); }); }); } When I run this code I lose all of my click bindings.

    Read the article

  • wsFederationHttpBinding over net.tcp

    - by CodeChef
    I have services that use net.tcp bindings (both streaming and buffered endpoints.) I'd like to add WIF federated security to those services, while continuing to use net.tcp bindings. I've tried to create custom bindings, but so far have been unsuccessful. Below is the general architecture that I'm attempting. I'm looking for the correct binding configuration to make this work. Client - WPF Application Relying party - WCF Service with net.tcp endpoints STS - WCF Service with http(s) endpoint

    Read the article

  • Learning frameworks without learning languages

    - by Tom Morris
    I've been reading up on GUI frameworks including WPF, GTK and Cocoa (UIKit). I don't really do anything related to Windows (I'm a Mac and Linux guy) or .NET, but I'd like to be able to throw together GUIs for various operating systems. We are in the enviable position now of having high level scripting languages that work with all of the major GUI toolkits. If you are doing Linux GUI programming, you could use GTK in C, but why not just use PyGTK (or PyQt). Similarly, for Java, one can use JRuby. For Mac, there's MacRuby. And on .NET, there's IronRuby. This is all fine and good, and if you are building a serious project, there are tradeoffs that you might encounter when deciding whether to, say, build a WPF app in C# or in IronRuby, or whether you are going to use PyGTK or not. The subjective question I have is: what about learning those frameworks? Are there strong reasons why one should or should not learn something like WPF or Cocoa in a language one is familiar with rather than having to learn a new language as well? I'm not saying you should never learn the language. If you are building Windows applications and you don't know C#, that might be a bit of a problem. But do you think it is okay to learn the framework first? This is both a general question and a specific question. I've used some Cocoa classes from Ruby and Python using things like PyObjC and there always seems to be an impedance mismatch because of the way Objective C libraries get built. Experiences and strong opinions welcome!

    Read the article

  • Where does the "mm" come from in GTKmm, glibmm, etc

    - by Cole Johnson
    I understand that the "mm" suffix [in various GTK-associated C++ binding libraries] means "minus minus," but where exactly does it come from? I understand that there is a programming language called "C--," but if there were bindings (and I'm pretty sure I've seen some), they would be suffixed "--". TL;DR: Is there some page on gnu.org that explains the "mm" suffix in various C++ bindings or is it just a de facto standard adopted by the open source community with no reasoning behind it?

    Read the article

  • How to start Mac OS X password screen

    - by Cocoa Newbie
    I am building an application in Mac OS X which should bring up the password screen in Mac OS X once when a button on a QT WIndow is clicked. Which API I should use for this? Also, how will my application get notified whether system is locked or not? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • Javascript function not getting Windows username

    - by Cocoa Dev
    function getWindowsUserName() { var WinNetwork = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Network"); var urlToSite = "http://localhost/index.php?nph-psf=0&HOSTID=AD&ALIAS=" & WinNetwork.username document.getElementById(psyncLink).value = urlToSite; } I am trying to make the frame load the urlToSite <frameset cols="300px, *"> <frame src="topo1.htm" name="topo" id="topo" application="yes" /> <frame src="http://localhost/index.php?nph-psf=0&HOSTID=AD&ALIAS=" name="psync" id="psyncLink" application="yes" /> </frameset>

    Read the article

  • How to add a multiline title bar in UINavigationController

    - by Cocoa Matters
    I have try to add a two line title bar in UINavigationController I want to adjust font size automatically set according to string length.My String max size goes to 60. I have try to implemented through following code UILabel *bigLabel = [[UILabel alloc] init]; bigLabel.text = @"1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 1234567890 123456"; bigLabel.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]; bigLabel.textColor = [UIColor whiteColor]; bigLabel.font = [UIFont boldSystemFontOfSize:20]; bigLabel.adjustsFontSizeToFitWidth = YES; bigLabel.clipsToBounds = NO; bigLabel.numberOfLines = 2; bigLabel.textAlignment = ([self.title length] < 10 ? NSTextAlignmentCenter : NSTextAlignmentLeft); [bigLabel sizeToFit]; self.navigationItem.titleView = bigLabel; It didn't work for me can you help me please. I have to made this for iPhone and iPad screen

    Read the article

  • Apache server still running but user can not connect website, after "sudo apachectl restart" user can connect website, what'r wrong? [on hold]

    - by Tinyfool
    My website is http://ourcoders.com/, recently I found sometime user report can not connect to my website, but I ssh to server, I found Apache still running, like this: root@AY1401261057077842eaZ:~# ps aux|grep apache root 873 0.0 1.3 290496 13528 ? Ss Aug18 0:28 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3490 0.0 1.8 299004 18764 ? S Aug21 0:01 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3612 0.0 1.5 296008 15540 ? S Aug21 0:03 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3860 0.0 1.5 296636 16268 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3913 0.0 1.2 295468 13084 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3931 0.0 1.7 298488 18228 ? S 16:02 0:01 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 3938 0.0 1.9 299128 19724 ? S 16:02 0:02 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 4465 0.0 1.6 296688 16404 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5075 0.0 1.2 295468 13044 ? S 16:16 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5153 0.0 1.5 295880 15612 ? S 16:17 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5770 0.0 1.5 296608 16016 ? S 16:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5773 0.0 1.6 296948 16640 ? S 16:30 0:00 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5816 0.0 1.6 297216 16976 ? S 16:31 0:01 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 5918 0.0 1.7 298228 17820 ? S 16:33 0:01 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6023 0.0 1.9 299864 19840 ? S 16:35 0:13 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6073 0.0 1.7 298480 18120 ? S 16:36 0:02 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6088 0.0 2.0 300488 21008 ? S 16:36 0:12 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6114 0.0 1.7 298548 18268 ? S 16:37 0:12 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6134 0.0 1.6 296688 16532 ? S 16:37 0:04 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6193 0.0 1.7 297908 17420 ? S 16:38 0:08 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 6821 0.0 1.8 299556 19072 ? S 16:43 0:11 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 7058 0.0 1.7 298676 18204 ? S 16:48 0:10 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 7065 0.0 1.8 299028 18868 ? S 16:48 0:11 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 7084 0.0 1.8 299508 19020 ? S 16:48 0:11 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 7221 0.0 1.8 299160 18768 ? S 16:51 0:09 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start www-data 11453 0.0 1.7 298484 18256 ? S 09:39 0:02 /usr/sbin/apache2 -k start root 26324 0.0 0.0 8084 920 pts/0 S+ 22:52 0:00 grep --color=auto apache root 28517 0.0 0.0 4404 612 ? S Aug21 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28518 0.0 0.0 4404 616 ? S Aug21 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28519 0.0 0.0 4404 612 ? S Aug21 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28520 0.0 0.0 4404 616 ? S Aug21 0:00 /bin/sh -c /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28521 0.0 0.0 4312 552 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28522 0.0 0.0 4308 548 ? S Aug21 0:07 /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28523 0.0 0.0 4176 352 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log root 28524 0.0 0.0 4180 356 ? S Aug21 0:00 /usr/sbin/cronolog /var/log/apache2/cocoa/%Y/%m/access-%Y-%m-%d.log Today's only error log is blow. [Sat Aug 23 22:52:47 2014] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart [Sat Aug 23 22:52:47 2014] [notice] Apache/2.2.22 (Ubuntu) PHP/5.3.10-1ubuntu3.13 with Suhosin-Patch configured -- resuming normal operations traffic information: cat access-2014-08-23.log | cut -d " " -f4 |cut -d":" -f2 |sort|uniq -c |sort -nr 5692 14 5291 15 5083 16 4723 23 4463 12 4057 17 4011 11 3926 13 3852 10 3187 05 3176 09 3055 06 2790 07 2672 00 2608 02 2591 01 2577 04 2514 03 2497 08 707 22 88 18 After I use "sudo apachectl restart", user can connect my website. So I want to know? What is the problem? And if "sudo apachectl restart" is needed, can I automate run this command? Today this kind struts appear again, and I run netstat -a -n Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:3306 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.120:50708 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.158:50278 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 220.173.142.152:23320 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 60.173.247.132:52851 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.158:39397 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.158:56894 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 183.129.174.2:21291 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.120:44499 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.120:34017 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 124.65.50.210:3774 SYN_RECV tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 0 0 127.0.0.1:15770 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61633 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 305 0 115.28.146.116:80 125.39.208.120:37593 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52866 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52873 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52868 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 343 0 115.28.146.116:80 182.118.20.215:50709 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:54784 173.194.127.243:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:41253 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52876 10.146.6.61:3306 ESTABLISHED tcp 559 0 115.28.146.116:80 218.241.144.114:54501 ESTABLISHED tcp 376 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.213.196.119:50604 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59339 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 214 0 115.28.146.116:80 142.4.215.40:34443 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:48635 115.28.146.116:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 187 0 115.28.146.116:80 115.28.146.116:48635 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52853 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 594 0 115.28.146.116:80 183.129.174.2:7090 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52874 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 182.118.20.166:44081 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59028 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61665 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52860 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:46983 10.146.6.61:3306 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 2290 115.28.146.116:80 14.154.179.243:41049 FIN_WAIT1 tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:42900 10.146.6.61:3306 ESTABLISHED tcp 571 0 115.28.146.116:80 220.173.142.152:23295 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59337 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 438 0 115.28.146.116:80 42.120.74.202:31567 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59498 ESTABLISHED tcp 259 0 115.28.146.116:80 66.249.65.56:36739 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59341 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 142.4.215.40:34267 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 799 0 115.28.146.116:80 180.173.88.1:52779 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 117.136.25.132:25207 FIN_WAIT2 tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 220.181.108.186:42540 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:59902 10.242.174.13:80 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 1820 115.28.146.116:80 218.22.140.90:39266 LAST_ACK tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 66.249.65.64:56977 TIME_WAIT tcp 669 0 115.28.146.116:80 83.251.90.61:49664 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52872 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 233 0 115.28.146.116:80 54.202.88.0:43398 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 479 0 115.28.146.116:80 65.49.44.149:25739 ESTABLISHED tcp 378 0 115.28.146.116:80 148.251.124.173:39313 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61697 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 49.4.158.2:52986 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 769 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61537 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52859 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55734 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 563 0 115.28.146.116:80 202.55.20.10:22577 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 194 0 115.28.146.116:80 37.58.100.165:50908 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 791 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:45628 ESTABLISHED tcp 709 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.116.61.178:65209 ESTABLISHED tcp 706 0 115.28.146.116:80 183.227.44.237:54519 ESTABLISHED tcp 301 0 115.28.146.116:80 118.198.243.127:31180 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55721 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55726 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55723 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 681 0 115.28.146.116:80 83.251.90.61:49662 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 83.251.90.61:65274 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59022 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 180.173.88.1:52781 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59037 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55728 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 231 0 115.28.146.116:37596 110.75.102.62:80 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61569 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:51310 10.146.6.61:3306 ESTABLISHED tcp 299 0 115.28.146.116:80 123.125.71.16:36281 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:48620 115.28.146.116:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 183.227.44.237:54520 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59026 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 479 0 115.28.146.116:80 65.49.44.149:5490 ESTABLISHED tcp 665 0 115.28.146.116:80 83.251.90.61:49663 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:53744 173.194.127.147:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59023 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:22 116.192.2.185:34205 ESTABLISHED tcp 333 0 115.28.146.116:80 149.174.113.111:54338 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52861 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52863 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:43272 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 767 0 115.28.146.116:80 49.4.158.2:52947 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 668 0 115.28.146.116:80 83.251.90.61:49665 ESTABLISHED tcp 642 0 115.28.146.116:80 222.78.185.50:55788 ESTABLISHED tcp 710 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.116.61.178:65264 ESTABLISHED tcp 284 0 115.28.146.116:80 157.55.39.243:65185 ESTABLISHED tcp 450 0 115.28.146.116:80 65.49.44.149:55496 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:36629 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 233 0 115.28.146.116:80 54.202.88.0:42424 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 187 0 115.28.146.116:80 115.28.146.116:48620 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 14.127.65.219:61601 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 776 0 115.28.146.116:80 202.118.253.102:64883 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 841 0 115.28.146.116:80 37.228.105.28:49472 ESTABLISHED tcp 787 0 115.28.146.116:80 112.65.226.198:52192 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:55717 10.164.2.163:9200 TIME_WAIT tcp 233 0 115.28.146.116:80 54.202.88.0:42855 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 379 0 115.28.146.116:80 101.226.166.219:2322 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:80 183.60.212.152:43063 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 180.173.88.1:52780 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 784 0 115.28.146.116:80 101.95.29.26:63094 ESTABLISHED tcp 463 0 115.28.146.116:80 65.49.44.149:53876 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:37946 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 479 0 115.28.146.116:80 65.49.44.149:41157 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59036 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 49.4.158.2:52984 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:38100 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52865 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59027 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:36508 173.194.127.81:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 210 0 115.28.146.116:80 188.143.232.123:47775 ESTABLISHED tcp 1 0 115.28.146.116:80 113.36.238.28:59025 CLOSE_WAIT tcp 0 0 10.144.142.201:52857 10.146.6.61:3306 TIME_WAIT tcp 654 0 115.28.146.116:80 49.4.158.2:52985 ESTABLISHED tcp 0 0 115.28.146.116:58627 110.75.102.62:80 ESTABLISHED tcp 782 0 115.28.146.116:80 180.153.219.13:40293 ESTABLISHED tcp 792 0 115.28.146.116:80 116.192.2.185:48187 CLOSE_WAIT tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN udp 0 0 115.28.146.116:123 0.0.0.0:* udp 0 0 10.144.142.201:123 0.0.0.0:* udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:123 0.0.0.0:* udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:123 0.0.0.0:* udp6 0 0 :::123 :::* Active UNIX domain sockets (servers and established) Proto RefCnt Flags Type State I-Node Path unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 8447 /var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock unix 2 [ ACC ] SEQPACKET LISTENING 6678 /run/udev/control unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 6482 @/com/ubuntu/upstart unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 7543 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 7 [ ] DGRAM 7551 /dev/log unix 2 [ ACC ] STREAM LISTENING 7650 /var/run/nscd/socket unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 7156424 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7156137 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7156136 unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 7156135 unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 7155834 unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 9734 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9151 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9150 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9136 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9135 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9106 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 9105 unix 2 [ ] DGRAM 9073 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7575 /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7574 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7565 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7564 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7332 @/com/ubuntu/upstart unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 7330 unix 3 [ ] DGRAM 6712 unix 3 [ ] DGRAM 6711 unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 6662 @/com/ubuntu/upstart unix 3 [ ] STREAM CONNECTED 6635

    Read the article

  • Howto WCF Service HTTPS Binding and Endpoint Configuration in IIS with Load Balancer?

    - by Mike G
    We have a WCF service that is being hosted on a set of 12 machines. There is a load balancer that is a gateway to these machines. Now the site is setup as SSL; as in a user accesses it through using an URL with https. I know this much, the URL that addresses the site is https, but none of the servers has a https binding or is setup to require SSL. This leads me to believe that the load balancer handles the https and the connection from the balancer to the servers are unencrypted (this takes place behind the firewall so no biggie there). The problem we're having is that when a Silverlight client tries to access a WCF service it is getting a "Not Found" error. I've set up a test site along with our developer machines and have made sure that the bindings and endpoints in the web.config work with the client. It seems to be the case in the production environment that we get this error. Is there anything wrong with the following web.config? Should we be setting up how https is handled in a different manner? We're at a loss on this currently since I've tried every programmatic solution with endpoints and bindings. None of the solutions I have found deal with a load balancer in the manner we're dealing. Web.config service model info: <system.serviceModel> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior name="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.CRM.CRMServiceBehavior"> <serviceMetadata httpsGetEnabled="true" /> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="false" /> </behavior> <behavior name="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.AccountAggregation.AccountAggregationBehavior"> <serviceMetadata httpsGetEnabled="true" /> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="false" /> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> <bindings> <customBinding> <binding name="SecureCRMCustomBinding"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpsTransport /> </binding> <binding name="SecureAACustomBinding"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpsTransport /> </binding> </customBinding> <mexHttpsBinding> <binding name="SecureMex" /> </mexHttpsBinding> </bindings> <serviceHostingEnvironment aspNetCompatibilityEnabled="true" /> <!--Defines the services to be used in the application--> <services> <service behaviorConfiguration="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.CRM.CRMServiceBehavior" name="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.CRM.CRMService"> <endpoint address="" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="SecureCRMCustomBinding" contract="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.CRM.CRMService" name="SecureCRMEndpoint" /> <!--This is required in order to be able to use the "Update Service Reference" in the Silverlight application--> <endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" /> </service> <service behaviorConfiguration="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.AccountAggregation.AccountAggregationBehavior" name="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.AccountAggregation.AccountAggregation"> <endpoint address="" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="SecureAACustomBinding" contract="TradePMR.OMS.Framework.Services.AccountAggregation.AccountAggregation" name="SecureAAEndpoint" /> <!--This is required in order to be able to use the "Update Service Reference" in the Silverlight application--> <endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange" /> </service> </services> </system.serviceModel> </configuration> The ServiceReferences.ClientConfig looks like this: <configuration> <system.serviceModel> <bindings> <customBinding> <binding name="StandardAAEndpoint"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" /> </binding> <binding name="SecureAAEndpoint"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpsTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" /> </binding> <binding name="StandardCRMEndpoint"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" /> </binding> <binding name="SecureCRMEndpoint"> <binaryMessageEncoding /> <httpsTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" /> </binding> </customBinding> </bindings> <client> <endpoint address="https://Service2.svc" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="SecureAAEndpoint" contract="AccountAggregationService.AccountAggregation" name="SecureAAEndpoint" /> <endpoint address="https://Service1.svc" binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="SecureCRMEndpoint" contract="CRMService.CRMService" name="SecureCRMEndpoint" /> </client> </system.serviceModel> </configuration> (The addresses are of no consequence since those are dynamically built so that they will point to a dev's machine or to the production server)

    Read the article

  • Emacs and Dvorak

    - by Nate
    I'm a dvorak typist and a vim power user, and I'm just starting to do some heavy development in a LISP and I figured I'd give emacs a shot. The trouble is, some of the commands are awkward on dvorak. How do I swap commands around? At the moment I'd like to make C-k act like C-x, C-t act like C-k, and C-x at like C-t, but I'm sure that I'll want to swap more things around as I learn what key combinations I actually use. I know that there are some emacs dvorak modes, but most of them remap all of the commands such that you can keep the qwerty bindings: however, I don't know the qwerty bindings, and most of the bindings are mnemonic, so I'd rather not use any of those. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • Getting WCF Services in a Silverlight solution to play nice on deployment

    - by brendonpage
    I have come across 2 issues with deploying WCF services in a Silverlight solution, admittedly the one is more of a hiccup, and only occurs if you take the easy way out and reference your services through visual studio. The First Issue This occurs when you deploy your WFC services to an IIS server. When browse to the services using your web browser, you are greeted with “This collection already contains an address with scheme http.  There can be at most one address per scheme in this collection.”. When you make a call to this service from your Silverlight application, you get the extremely helpful “NotFound” error, this error message can be found in the error property of the event arguments on the complete event handler for that call. As it did with me this will leave most people scratching their head, because the very same services work just fine on the ASP.NET Development Web Server and on my local IIS server. Now I’m no server/hosting/IIS expert so I did a bit of searching when I first encountered this issue. I found out this happens because IIS supports multiple address bindings per protocol (http/https/ftp … etc) per web site, but WCF only supports binding to one address per protocol. This causes a problem when the WCF service is hosted on a site with multiple address bindings, because IIS provides all of the bindings to the host factory when running the service. While this problem occurs mainly on shared hosting solutions, it is not limited to shared hosting, it just seems like all shared hosting providers setup sites on their servers with multiple address bindings. For interests sake I added functionality to the example project attached to this post to dump the addresses given to the WCF service by IIS into a log file. This was the output on the shared hosting solution I use: http://mydomain.co.za/Services/TestService.svc http://www.mydomain.co.za/Services/TestService.svc http://mydomain-co-za.win13.wadns.net/Services/TestService.svc http://win13/Services/TestService.svc As you can see all these addresses are for the http protocol, which is where it all goes wrong for WCF. Fixes for the First Issue There are a few ways to get around this. The first being the easiest, target .NET 4! Yes that's right in .NET 4 WCF services support multiple addresses per protocol. This functionality is enabled by an option, which is on by default if you create a new project, you will need to turn on if you are upgrading to .NET 4. To do this set the multipleSiteBindingsEnabled property of the serviceHostingEnviroment tag in the web.config file to true, as shown below: <system.serviceModel>     <serviceHostingEnvironment multipleSiteBindingsEnabled="true" /> </system.serviceModel> Beware this ONLY works in .NET 4, so if you don’t have a server with .NET 4 installed on that you can deploy to, you will need to employ one of the other work a rounds. The second option will work for .NET 3.5 & 4. For this option all you need to do is modify the web.config file and add baseAddressPrefixFilters to the serviceHostingEnviroment tag as shown below: <system.serviceModel>     <serviceHostingEnvironment>         <baseAddressPrefixFilters>              <add prefix="http://www.mydomain.co.za"/>         </baseAddressPrefixFilters>     </serviceHostingEnvironment> </system.serviceModel> These will be used to filter the list of base addresses that IIS provides to the host factory. When specifying these prefix filters be sure to specify filters which will only allow 1 result through, otherwise the entire exercise will be pointless. There is however a problem with this work a round, you are only allowed to specify 1 prefix filter per protocol. Which means you can’t add filters for all your environments, this will therefore add to the list of things to do before deploying or switching dev machines. The third option is the one I currently employ, it will work for .NET 3, 3.5 & 4, although it is not needed for .NET 4. For this option you create a custom host factory which inherits from the ServiceHostFactory class. In the implementation of the ServiceHostFactory you employ logic to figure out which of the base addresses, that are give by IIS, to use when creating the service host. The logic you use to do this is completely up to you, I have seen quite a few solutions that simply statically reference an index from the list of base addresses, this works for most situations but falls short in others. For instance, if the order of the base addresses where to change, it might end up returning an address that only resolves on the servers local network, like the last one in the example I gave at the beginning. Another instance, if a request comes in on a different protocol, like https, you will be creating the service host using an address which is on the incorrect protocol, like http. To reliably find the correct address to use, I use the address that the service was requested on. To accomplish this I use the HttpContext, which requires the service to operate with AspNetCompatibilityRequirements set on. If for some reason running you services with AspNetCompatibilityRequirements on isn’t an option, you can still use this method, you will just have to come up with your own logic for selecting the correct address. First you will need to enable AspNetCompatibilityRequirements for your hosting environment, to do this you will need to set it to true in the web.config file as shown below: <system.serviceModel>     <serviceHostingEnvironment AspNetCompatibilityRequirements="true" /> </system.serviceModel> You will then need to mark any services that are going to use the custom host factory, to allow AspNetCompatibilityRequirements, as shown below: [AspNetCompatibilityRequirements(RequirementsMode = AspNetCompatibilityRequirementsMode.Allowed)] public class TestService { } Now for the custom host factory, this is where the logic lives that selects the correct address to create service host with. The one i use is shown below: public class CustomHostFactory : ServiceHostFactory { protected override ServiceHost CreateServiceHost(Type serviceType, Uri[] baseAddresses) { // // Compose a prefix filter based on the requested uri // string prefixFilter = HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Scheme + "://" + HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.DnsSafeHost; if (!HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.IsDefaultPort) { prefixFilter += ":" + HttpContext.Current.Request.Url.Port.ToString() + "/"; } // // Find a base address that matches the prefix filter // foreach (Uri baseAddress in baseAddresses) { if (baseAddress.OriginalString.StartsWith(prefixFilter)) { return new ServiceHost(serviceType, baseAddress); } } // // Throw exception if no matching base address was found // throw new Exception("Custom Host Factory: No base address matching '" + prefixFilter + "' was found."); } } The most important line in the custom host factory is the one that returns a new service host. This has to return a service host that specifies only one base address per protocol. Since I filter by the address the request came on in, I only need to create the service host with one address, since this address will always be of the correct protocol. Now you have a custom host factory you have to tell your services to use it. To do this you view the markup of the service by right clicking on it in the solution explorer and choosing “View Markup”. Then you add/set the value of the Factory property to the full namespace path of you custom host factory, as shown below. And that is it done, the service will now use the specified custom host factory. The Second Issue As I mentioned earlier this issue is more of a hiccup, but I thought worthy of a mention so I included it. This issue only occurs when you add a service reference to a Silverlight project. Visual Studio will generate a lot of code for you, part of that generated code is the ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file. This file stores the endpoint configuration that is used when accessing your services using the generated proxy classes. Here is what that file looks like: <configuration>     <system.serviceModel>         <bindings>             <customBinding>                 <binding name="CustomBinding_TestService">                     <binaryMessageEncoding />                     <httpTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" />                 </binding>                 <binding name="CustomBinding_BrokenService">                     <binaryMessageEncoding />                     <httpTransport maxReceivedMessageSize="2147483647" maxBufferSize="2147483647" />                 </binding>             </customBinding>         </bindings>         <client>             <endpoint address="http://localhost:49347/services/TestService.svc"                 binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="CustomBinding_TestService"                 contract="TestService.TestService" name="CustomBinding_TestService" />             <endpoint address="http://localhost:49347/Services/BrokenService.svc"                 binding="customBinding" bindingConfiguration="CustomBinding_BrokenService"                 contract="BrokenService.BrokenService" name="CustomBinding_BrokenService" />         </client>     </system.serviceModel> </configuration> As you will notice the addresses for the end points are set to the addresses of the services you added the service references from, so unless you are adding the service references from your live services, you will have to change these addresses before you deploy. This is little more than an annoyance really, but it adds to the list of things to do before you can deploy, and if left unchecked that list can get out of control. Fix for the Second Issue The way you would usually access a service added this way is to create an instance of the proxy class like so: BrokenServiceClient proxy = new BrokenServiceClient(); Closer inspection of these generated proxy classes reveals that there are a few overloaded constructors, one of which allows you to specify the end point address to use when creating the proxy. From here all you have to do is come up with some logic that will provide you with the relative path to your services. Since my WCF services are usually hosted in the same project as my Silverlight app I use the class shown below: public class ServiceProxyHelper { /// <summary> /// Create a broken service proxy /// </summary> /// <returns>A broken service proxy</returns> public static BrokenServiceClient CreateBrokenServiceProxy() { Uri address = new Uri(Application.Current.Host.Source, "../Services/BrokenService.svc"); return new BrokenServiceClient("CustomBinding_BrokenService", address.AbsoluteUri); } } Then I will create an instance of the proxy class using my service helper class like so: BrokenServiceClient proxy = ServiceProxyHelper.CreateBrokenServiceProxy(); The way this works is “Application.Current.Host.Source” will return the URL to the ClientBin folder the Silverlight app is hosted in, the “../Services/BrokenService.svc” is then used as the relative path to the service from the ClientBin folder, combined by the Uri object this gives me the URL to my service. The “CustomBinding_BrokenService” is a reference to the end point configuration in the ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file. Yes this means you still need the ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file. All this is doing is using a different end point address than the one specified in the ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file, all the other settings form the ServiceReferences.ClientConfig file are still used when creating the proxy. I have uploaded an example project which covers the custom host factory solution from the first issue and everything from the second issue. I included the code to write a list of base addresses to a log file in my implementation of the custom host factory, this is not need for the custom host factory to function and can safely be removed. Download (WCFServicesDeploymentExample.zip)

    Read the article

  • Script language native extensions - avoiding name collisions and cluttering others' namespace

    - by H2CO3
    I have developed a small scripting language and I've just started writing the very first native library bindings. This is practically the first time I'm writing a native extension to a script language, so I've run into a conceptual issue. I'd like to write glue code for popular libraries so that they can be used from this language, and because of the design of the engine I've written, this is achieved using an array of C structs describing the function name visible by the virtual machine, along with a function pointer. Thus, a native binding is really just a global array variable, and now I must obviously give it a (preferably good) name. In C, it's idiomatic to put one's own functions in a "namespace" by prepending a custom prefix to function names, as in myscript_parse_source() or myscript_run_bytecode(). The custom name shall ideally describe the name of the library which it is part of. Here arises the confusion. Let's say I'm writing a binding for libcURL. In this case, it seems reasonable to call my extension library curl_myscript_binding, like this: MYSCRIPT_API const MyScriptExtFunc curl_myscript_lib[10]; But now this collides with the curl namespace. (I have even thought about calling it curlmyscript_lib but unfortunately, libcURL does not exclusively use the curl_ prefix -- the public APIs contain macros like CURLCODE_* and CURLOPT_*, so I assume this would clutter the namespace as well.) Another option would be to declare it as myscript_curl_lib, but that's good only as long as I'm the only one who writes bindings (since I know what I am doing with my namespace). As soon as other contributors start to add their own native bindings, they now clutter the myscript namespace. (I've done some research, and it seems that for example the Perl cURL binding follows this pattern. Not sure what I should think about that...) So how do you suggest I name my variables? Are there any general guidelines that should be followed?

    Read the article

  • How can I use WCF with only basichttpbinding, SSL and Basic Authentication in IIS?

    - by Tim
    Hello, Is it possible to setup a WCF service with SSL and Basic Authentication in IIS using only BasicHttpBinding-binding? (I can’t use the wsHttpBinding-binding) The site is hosted on IIS 7, with the following authentication set up: - Anonymous access: off - Basic authentication: on - Integrated Windows authentication: off !! Service Config: <services> <service name="NameSpace.SomeService"> <host> <baseAddresses> <add baseAddress="https://hostname/SomeService/" /> </baseAddresses> </host> <!-- Service Endpoints --> <endpoint address="" binding="basicHttpBinding" bindingNamespace="http://hostname/SomeMethodName/1" contract="NameSpace.ISomeInterfaceService" name="Default" /> <endpoint address="mex" binding="mexHttpsBinding" contract="IMetadataExchange"/> </service> </services> <behaviors> <serviceBehaviors> <behavior> <!-- To avoid disclosing metadata information, set the value below to false and remove the metadata endpoint above before deployment --> <serviceMetadata httpsGetEnabled="true"/> <!-- To receive exception details in faults for debugging purposes, set the value below to true. Set to false before deployment to avoid disclosing exception information --> <serviceDebug includeExceptionDetailInFaults="false"/> <exceptionShielding/> </behavior> </serviceBehaviors> </behaviors> I tried 2 types of bindings with two different errors: 1 - IIS Error: 'Could not find a base address that matches scheme http for the endpoint with binding BasicHttpBinding. Registered base address schemes are [https]. <bindings> <basicHttpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportCredentialOnly"> <transport clientCredentialType="Basic"/> </security> </binding> </basicHttpBinding> </bindings> 2 - IIS Error: Security settings for this service require 'Anonymous' Authentication but it is not enabled for the IIS application that hosts this service. <bindings> <basicHttpBinding> <binding> <security mode="Transport"> <transport clientCredentialType="Basic"/> </security> </binding> </basicHttpBinding> </bindings> Does somebody know how to configure this correctly? (if possible?)

    Read the article

  • Configuring multiple distinct WCF binding configurations causes an exception to be thrown

    - by Sandor Drieënhuizen
    I have a set of IIS7-hosted net.tcp WCF services that serve my ASP.NET MVC web application. The web application is accessed over the internet. WCF Services (IIS7) <--> ASP.NET MVC Application <--> Client Browser The services are username authenticated, the account that a client (of my web application) uses to logon ends up as the current principal on the host. I want one of the services to be authenticated differently, because it serves the view model for my logon view. When it's called, the client is obviously not logged on yet. I figure Windows authentication serves best or perhaps just certificate based security (which in fact I should use for the authenticated services as well) if the services are hosted on a machine that is not in the same domain as the web application. That's not the point here though. Using multiple TCP bindings is what's giving me trouble. I tried setting it up like this: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> The thing is that both bindings don't seem to want live together in my host. When I remove either of them, all's fine but together they produce the following exception on the client: The requested upgrade is not supported by 'net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc'. This could be due to mismatched bindings (for example security enabled on the client and not on the server). In the server trace log, I find the following exception: Protocol Type application/negotiate was sent to a service that does not support that type of upgrade. Am I looking into the right direction or is there a better way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • Using multiple distinct TCP security binding configurations in a single WCF IIS-hosted WCF service a

    - by Sandor Drieënhuizen
    I have a set of IIS7-hosted net.tcp WCF services that serve my ASP.NET MVC web application. The web application is accessed over the internet. WCF Services (IIS7) <--> ASP.NET MVC Application <--> Client Browser The services are username authenticated, the account that a client (of my web application) uses to logon ends up as the current principal on the host. I want one of the services to be authenticated differently, because it serves the view model for my logon view. When it's called, the client is obviously not logged on yet. I figure Windows authentication serves best or perhaps just certificate based security (which in fact I should use for the authenticated services as well) if the services are hosted on a machine that is not in the same domain as the web application. That's not the point here though. Using multiple TCP bindings is what's giving me trouble. I tried setting it up like this: <bindings> <netTcpBinding> <binding> <security mode="TransportWithMessageCredential"> <message clientCredentialType="UserName"/> </security> </binding> <binding name="public"> <security mode="Transport"> <message clientCredentialType="Windows"/> </security> </binding> </netTcpBinding> </bindings> The thing is that both bindings don't seem to want live together in my host. When I remove either of them, all's fine but together they produce the following exception on the client: The requested upgrade is not supported by 'net.tcp://localhost:8081/Service2.svc'. This could be due to mismatched bindings (for example security enabled on the client and not on the server). In the server trace log, I find the following exception: Protocol Type application/negotiate was sent to a service that does not support that type of upgrade. Am I looking into the right direction or is there a better way to solve this?

    Read the article

  • Need additional help with binding multiple CommandParameters using MultiBinding

    - by Dave
    I need to have a command handler for a ToggleButton that can take multiple parameters, namely the IsChecked property of said ToggleButton, along with a constant value, which could be a string, byte, int... doesn't matter. I found this great question on SO and followed the answer's link and read up on MultiBinding and IMultiValueConverter. It went really smoothly until I had to write the MultiBinding, when I realized that I also need to pass a constant value and couldn't do something like <Binding Value="1" /> I then came across another similar question that Kent Boogaart answered, and then I started to think about ways that I could get around this. One possible way is to not use MVVM and simply add the Tag property to my ToggleButton, in which case my MultiBinding would look like this: <MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource MyConverter}"> <MultiBinding.Bindings> <Binding Path="IsChecked" /> <Binding Path="Tag" /> </MultiBinding.Bindings> </MultiBinding> Kent had made a comment along the lines of, "if you're using MVVM you should be able to get around this issue". However, I'm not sure that's an option for me, even though I have adopted MVVM as my WPF pattern of necessity choice. The reason why I say this is that I have wayyyy more than one ToggleButton in the UserControl, and each of the ToggleButtons' Commands need to call the same function. But since they are ToggleButtons, I can't use the property bound to IsChecked in the ViewModel, because I don't know which one was last clicked. I suppose I could add another private property to keep track of this, but it seems a little silly. As far as the constant goes, I could probably get rid of this if I did the tracking idea, but not sure of any other way to get around it. Does anyone have good suggestions for me here? :) EDIT -- ok, so I need to update my bindings, which still don't work quite right: <ToggleButton Tag="1" Command="{Binding MyCommand}" Style="{StaticResource PassFailToggleButtonStyle}" HorizontalContentAlignment="Center" Background="Transparent" BorderBrush="Transparent" BorderThickness="0"> <ToggleButton.CommandParameter> <MultiBinding Converter="{StaticResource MyConverter}"> <MultiBinding.Bindings> <Binding Path="IsChecked" RelativeSource="{RelativeSource Mode=Self}" /> <Binding Path="Tag" RelativeSource="{RelativeSource Mode=Self}" /> </MultiBinding.Bindings> </MultiBinding> </ToggleButton.CommandParameter> </ToggleButton> IsChecked was working, but not Tag. I just realized that Tag is a string... duh. It's working now! The key was to use a RelativeSource of Self.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142  | Next Page >