java developer - Page 1369

How to get Custom Property from ASP.NET Textbox using javascript?

- by Dee

I have created a custom text box with property "key"(ASP.NET C#).I want to get the value of this property "key" using java script.How can I do this?

Is the Scala 2.8 collections library a case of "the longest suicide note in history" ?

First note the inflammatory subject title is a quotation made about the manifesto of a UK political party in the early 1980s. This question is subjective but it is a genuine question, I've made it CW and I'd like some opinions on the matter. Despite whatever my wife and coworkers keep telling me, I don't think I'm an idiot: I have a good degree in mathematics from the University of Oxford and I've been programming commercially for almost 12 years and in Scala for about a year (also commercially). I have just started to look at the Scala collections library re-implementation which is coming in the imminent 2.8 release. Those familiar with the library from 2.7 will notice that the library, from a usage perspective, has changed little. For example... > List("Paris", "London").map(_.length) res0: List[Int] List(5, 6) ...would work in either versions. The library is eminently useable: in fact it's fantastic. However, those previously unfamiliar with Scala and poking around to get a feel for the language now have to make sense of method signatures like: def map[B, That](f: A => B)(implicit bf: CanBuildFrom[Repr, B, That]): That For such simple functionality, this is a daunting signature and one which I find myself struggling to understand. Not that I think Scala was ever likely to be the next Java (or /C/C++/C#) - I don't believe its creators were aiming it at that market - but I think it is/was certainly feasible for Scala to become the next Ruby or Python (i.e. to gain a significant commercial user-base) Is this going to put people off coming to Scala? Is this going to give Scala a bad name in the commercial world as an academic plaything that only dedicated PhD students can understand? Are CTOs and heads of software going to get scared off? Was the library re-design a sensible idea? If you're using Scala commercially, are you worried about this? Are you planning to adopt 2.8 immediately or wait to see what happens? Steve Yegge once attacked Scala (mistakenly in my opinion) for what he saw as its overcomplicated type-system. I worry that someone is going to have a field day spreading fud with this API (similarly to how Josh Bloch scared the JCP out of adding closures to Java). Note - I should be clear that, whilst I believe that Josh Bloch was influential in the rejection of the BGGA closures proposal, I don't ascribe this to anything other than his honestly-held beliefs that the proposal represented a mistake.

Search Results

Search found 41348 results on 1654 pages for 'java developer'.

Page 1369/1654 | < Previous Page | 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 | Next Page >

- by Dee

- by oxbow_lakes

- by brianegge

- by CitadelCSAlum

- by user145610

- by Jeremy Rudd

- by Witek

- by poeschlorn

- by noisy

- by tunnuz

- by nimcap

- by michael lucas

- by Bedwyr Humphreys

- by Eric

- by karim

- by Jörg Battermann

- by Nick Jones

- by victor

- by Stephen Cagle

- by anta40

- by Lars Corneliussen

- by Oleksandr Bolotov

- by user286702

- by Isaac Waller

- by Natasha

< Previous Page | 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 | Next Page >