Search Results

Search found 7617 results on 305 pages for 'fields for'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 149/305 | < Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >

  • When would I want to model a class with a private ctor?

    - by dotnetdev
    Hi, I've seen plenty of classes in .NET which have private constructor (Stream is one of them I think). When would I want to model a class like this? I keep thinking that if my class has no internal state/fields, then I can make it have a private constructor. Am I on the right track with this idea? I can understand the use of a factory (I've run into the tipping point a few times), but not with a private constructor class. Thanks

    Read the article

  • More dry views?

    - by Pravin
    I have a simple index page for clients. Client has 20 fields. I am displaying list of clients in a table. For this I have to write in my views something like: - @clients.each do |client| %tr %td=client.name %td=client.email %td=client.address %td=client.phone etc... I am just curious if I can do it something like - @clients.each do |client| - client do %tr %td= name %td= email %td= address %td= phone etc...

    Read the article

  • How to pass data between controls and persist the values in WPF

    - by randyc
    I am stuck on how to pass data from one control to another. If I have a listbox control and the Contol Item contains a datatemplate which renders out 5 fields ( first name, last name, email, phone and DOB) all of which come from an observable collection. How can I allow the user to select a listbox item and have the valuesbe stored within a new listbox control? Is this done through the creation of a new collection or is there a more simple way to bind these values to a new control? thank you,

    Read the article

  • group member dropdown in visual studio 2008

    - by knittl
    in visual studio is the member dropdown, where you can select all members of the current type alphabetically ordered. is there an option which allows grouping of the members? i.e. all constructors before all methods before all properties before all events before all fields? if there is not, bad for me, i guess—it would really enhance productivity

    Read the article

  • Disable automatic index on related object id from yml

    - by BugBusterX
    Doctrine Automatically creates indexes on columns that are used to define object relations, For example user: id, name message: id, sender_id, receiver_id, message if I define relationship between message and user in a way that message has one Sender and has one Receiver, doctrine will automatically index sender_id and receiver_id fields when I generate sql from model. I would like to disable index on sender, because I manually create index with sender_id and receiver id together. How can I disable auto generated index?

    Read the article

  • Ruby on Rails collection_select display attribute

    - by New2rails
    I'm new to Rails and am working with the collection_select method. I have two fields I'd like to display in my select box: first_name and last_name So far, I can only display one or the other, not both. Here's the code I'm working with: collection_select(:hour,:shopper_id,@shoppers,:id,"last_name") Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Help with this JET Sql Query [SOLVED]

    - by yae
    Hi: I need help to do this query select. for example I have these fields: idInvoice date amount Depending of the date I need multiply the field "amount" for x number or other one. For example, if the date is less 01/01/2010 to multiply for 20 . But if it is major or equal to multiply for 35 Select idInvoice, date, amount, amount * varNumber from invoices

    Read the article

  • Is passing a struct value to a method by-reference in C# an acceptable optimization?

    - by Arc
    Say I have a struct: struct MyStruct { public int X public int Y } And a method in some class that is iterated over many times elsewhere: public bool MyMethod( MyStruct myStruct ) { return ... } Is changing the MyMethod signature to the following an acceptable optimization? public bool MyMethod( ref MyStruct myStruct ) If so, how much of an advantage would it really be? If not, about how many fields would a struct need for a big enough advantage using ref this way?

    Read the article

  • Downsides to immutable objects in Java?

    - by parkr
    The advantages of immutable objects in Java seem clear: consistent state automatic thread safety simplicity You can favour immutability by using private final fields and constructor injection. But, what are the downsides to favouring immutable objects in Java? i.e. incompatibility with ORM or web presentation tools? Inflexible design? Implementation complexities? Is it possible to design a large-scale system (deep object graph) that predominately uses immutable objects?

    Read the article

  • How to implement table-per-concrete-type using entity framework

    - by SDReyes
    Hello Guys! I'm mapping a set of tables that share a common set of fields: So as you can see I'm using a table-per-concrete-type strategy to map the inheritance. But... I have not could to relate them to an abstract type containing these common properties. It's possible to do it using EF? BONUS: The only non documented Entity Data Model Mapping Scenario is Table-per-concrete-type inheritance http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc716779.aspx : P

    Read the article

  • Help using recursion in Java

    - by Mercer
    I have a class Group. In the class I have two fields, idGroup IdGroupGroup. Groups may be part of other groups. My class Group is defined in a HashMap<Integer,Integer>; the key is IdGroupGroup and value is idGroup. I want to search the map for a particular idGroup; can I use recursion to do this?

    Read the article

  • Conditional sorting in MySQL?

    - by serg555
    I have "tasks" table with 3 fields: date priority (0,1,2) done (0,1) What I am trying to achieve is with the whole table sorted by done flag, tasks that are not done should be sorted by priority, while tasks that are done should be sorted by date: Select * from tasks order by done asc If done=0 additionally order by priority desc If done=1 additionally order by date desc Is it possible to do this in MySQL without unions? Thanks.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156  | Next Page >